Jump to content
Navy Forum for Enlisted, Reserves, Veterans, Chiefs & Spouses

FY-22 Chief Selection Board

OrdieLife
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest CrookedJack

Guest CrookedJack

Posted
Posted

No I think it will come out on the 4th.  Has the results ever been released earlier than reported?

 

  • Replies 371
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

IT_Fun
IT_Fun

Got the S here!

OrdieLife
OrdieLife

I’m ready for Monday to come and go already lol I just wanna know either way at this point 😂 😂 either I pick up or I move back on to another stressful LPO spot for another year 

smellofdiesel
smellofdiesel

5th time up got the S!!! 

Guest mgoose87

Guest mgoose87

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, CrookedJack said:

No I think it will come out on the 4th.  Has the results ever been released earlier than reported?

 

Last year they did by almost 2 weeks and was also a delayed year due to COVID.

Guest mgoose87

Guest mgoose87

Posted
Posted
On 9/17/2021 at 8:48 PM, Nuke1st4ever said:

39 of 304, but there's 404 eligible?

Possible that they're separating people based on who has the N33Z NEC. That is a prerequisite now.

Guest CS1

Guest CS1

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, mgoose87 said:

Last year they did by almost 2 weeks and was also a delayed year due to COVID.

A couple years ago same thing they came out earlier than expected

Guest Nuke1st4ever

Guest Nuke1st4ever

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CS1 said:

A couple years ago same thing they came out earlier than expected

I wish they would, but I don't see them doing that this year. It was about a month between the board adjourning and the results for the reserves. I figure it'll be the same for active duty.

Guest Nickolas

Guest Nickolas

Posted
Posted

Sept 30 to TRIAD. Just a hope tho, nothing to back it.

Guest mmn1ss

Guest mmn1ss

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, Nickolas said:

Sept 30 to TRIAD. Just a hope tho, nothing to back it.

I like the hopes and dreams with you saying this, but I am going to go with the crowd and say the published timeline of the 4th/5th. 

OR,

Just be a negative nancy and say the week of the 11th and watch the world burn around me.

Guest CrookedJack

Guest CrookedJack

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, mmn1ss said:

I like the hopes and dreams with you saying this, but I am going to go with the crowd and say the published timeline of the 4th/5th. 

OR,

Just be a negative nancy and say the week of the 11th and watch the world burn around me.

 

some-men-arent-looking-for-anything-logical-ohey-cant-be-20566652.png

Guest CS1

Guest CS1

Posted
Posted

 

5 hours ago, The(SW/AW) Pusher said:

I got some lol …been hearin about next week results??? What’s good lol

Let's go

EYE_TEA_SEE Apprentice

EYE_TEA_SEE

Posted
Posted

Question….
Is it safe to that if my new command hasn’t gained me by the date results come out, I’d have to reach out to my old command for results?

 Like I’ve checked into admin and been here for about two weeks, but nsips and every other reporting metrics shows I haven’t reported yet. Thanks for the feedback!

Guest Nuke1st4ever

Guest Nuke1st4ever

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, I_IT said:

Question….
Is it safe to that if my new command hasn’t gained me by the date results come out, I’d have to reach out to my old command for results?

 Like I’ve checked into admin and been here for about two weeks, but nsips and every other reporting metrics shows I haven’t reported yet. Thanks for the feedback!

Depends on what UIC you put down on your EAW. Also, your triad can look you up when results come out to see if you made it or not. You can also see if you got the S on anvy advancement the day results come out.

Stockage Newbie

Stockage

Posted
Posted

This year's precept states

"Impermissible Considerations. Promotion boards are prohibited from considering the following: 

a. The marital status, civilian employment, religion, or volunteer service of an eligible candidate;.."

Does anyone know how the volunteer service will be handled now? I know a lot of individuals have volunteering on their evals. 

EYE_TEA_SEE Apprentice

EYE_TEA_SEE

Posted
Posted

Thanks, wasn't aware other commands can lookup results for Sailors not under their UIC. Tracking on BOL showing S or N but, I know that typically is the next day. Oh well, worse come to worst I'll hit up the old CMC. 

Guest CS1

Guest CS1

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Stockage said:

This year's precept states

"Impermissible Considerations. Promotion boards are prohibited from considering the following: 

a. The marital status, civilian employment, religion, or volunteer service of an eligible candidate;.."

Does anyone know how the volunteer service will be handled now? I know a lot of individuals have volunteering on their evals. 

So it says spouse volunteer info so I would believe our volunteer service still would count especially if we earned our MOVSM at least I hope I finally got mine approved and submitted this time. 

Screenshot_20210926-194717_Acrobat for Samsung.jpg

Stockage Newbie

Stockage

Posted
Posted
Just now, CS1 said:

So it says spouse volunteer info so I would believe our volunteer service still would count especially if we earned our MOVSM at least I hope I finally got mine approved and submitted this time. 

Screenshot_20210926-194717_Acrobat for Samsung.jpg

thank you for posting the precept snip, couldn't get it to work for myself.

in B it covers the spouse volunteer as well. I'm referring to A. which covers us as SBE candidates

Guest CS1

Guest CS1

Posted
Posted
Just now, CS1 said:

So it says spouse volunteer info so I would believe our volunteer service still would count especially if we earned our MOVSM at least I hope I finally got mine approved and submitted this time. 

Screenshot_20210926-194717_Acrobat for Samsung.jpg

But it says both too 😪 I still will do my volunteer regardless but everyone looked at my records and asked about MOVSM if it doesn't count now that's going to suck. As that was the one thing I was told I was missing

Guest Flipdash

Guest Flipdash

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Stockage said:

This year's precept states

"Impermissible Considerations. Promotion boards are prohibited from considering the following: 

a. The marital status, civilian employment, religion, or volunteer service of an eligible candidate;.."

Does anyone know how the volunteer service will be handled now? I know a lot of individuals have volunteering on their evals. 

That's for the board members not bordees... 

Guest I. D.eploy C.onstantly

Guest I. D.eploy C.onstantly

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Flipdash said:

That's for the board members not bordees... 

This definitely makes sense now. Thanks for clearing this up.

Guest mmn1ss

Guest mmn1ss

Posted
Posted

So with it being later in the day, I am going to assume the normal Tuesday/Wednesday routine for results is not likely this week. Oh well, off to the worry corner with some OJ to calm my nerves!

Guest Rodrigjj21

Guest Rodrigjj21

Posted
Posted

My command is sticking to the 5th for results, no new rumors or at least anything worth believing besides that. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Guest CrookedJack

Guest CrookedJack

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, mmn1ss said:

So with it being later in the day, I am going to assume the normal Tuesday/Wednesday routine for results is not likely this week. Oh well, off to the worry corner with some OJ to calm my nerves!

October 4th, next Monday results are supposed to come out "all you cool cats and kittens."

Everyone ready for that S or N-S?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 🧧 Activity Stream

    1. 0

      The US Navy is leaving the volatile Middle East without an aircraft carrier again, even as fighting continues

      The US Navy is again without an aircraft carrier in the Middle East; it's the second time in the past year that it has lacked this capability despite the fighting still going on in the region. A US official confirmed to Business Insider on Tuesday that the Navy's sole carrier in the Middle East, USS Abraham Lincoln, left the region over the weekend after several months of operations there.
      Tony in Conflict
    2. 0

      Navy Shutters Premier East Coast Substance Abuse Program Amid Staffing Shortages

      The Navy has suspended operation of its residential substance abuse treatment program at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Virginia, as a result of staffing shortages that affected the quality of care. The service closed the program, considered the Navy's top rehab center on the East Coast, in September, officials confirmed this month. All patients were sent to or are being referred to other Defense Department residential programs or the Tricare network, NMCP Public Affairs Officer Christina Johnson said.
      Tony in Mental Health
    3. 0

      FY-26 NAVY REAR ADMIRAL LINE AND STAFF CORPS SELECTIONS

      CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED// ROUTINE R 191408Z NOV 24 MID120001560579U FM SECNAV WASHINGTON DC TO ALNAV INFO SECNAV WASHINGTON DC CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS ALNAV 091/24 MSGID/GENADMIN/SECNAV WASHINGTON DC/-/NOV// SUBJ/FY-26 NAVY REAR ADMIRAL LINE AND STAFF CORPS SELECTIONS// RMKS/1. The President of the United States has approved the reports of the selection boards which recommend the following officers in the line and staff corps on the active-duty list for promotion to the permanent grade of Rear Admiral. 2. Frocking to Rear Admiral is not authorized except on an individual basis by the Secretary of Defense. Alexander, Christopher D. Andros, Bradley J. Bailey, Sean R. Bennett, Brian H. Cruz, Adan G. Dougherty, John E. IV Henderschedt, Thomas M. Kijek, Christopher A. McCoy, Max G. Jr Moninger, Thomas P. Muckian, Martin J. Newkirk, Gregory D. Rucker, Jonathan E. Schafer, Mark A. Tilbrook, Nicholas R. Williams, Douglas L. Wirth, Robert E. Wosje, Michael S. 3. These nominations will ensure the Navy is equipped with capable senior leaders to employ, generate, and design the Fleet for combat operations, recognizing that the continued preeminence of U.S. naval power is inextricably linked to the ability to successfully change by advancing our culture. To do so, officers with proven sustained superior performance in command leadership positions in difficult and challenging assignments, including those in the diplomatic/foreign service arena were chosen. 4. The Board sought innovative and bold leaders who are ready to sustain the Get Real, Get Better movement by role-modeling GRGB leadership behaviors and problem solving. These officers are their own toughest critic, think creatively, challenge assumptions, and take well-calculated risks to maximize effectiveness. The Board selected those officers with superior leadership skills that may be further developed in a variety of assignments across the Navy without regard to community, platform, or career paths to serve as the future leaders of the Navy. 5. The convening orders and precepts for both boards may be found on the MyNavy HR website at the following link: https://www.mynavyhr.navy.mil/Career-Management/Boards/Flag/Precepts/. 6. Released by Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the Navy.// BT #0001 NNNN CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED//
      Tony in Navy Officer
×
×
  • Create New...
Forum Home
www.NavyAdvancement.com
Boots | Navy Patches
Serving enlisted, veterans, spouses & family