Jump to content
Navy Forum for Enlisted, Reserves, Veterans, Chiefs & Spouses

FY20 Chief Selection Board

Guest AME1
 Share

Recommended Posts

Recommended

Posted by Guest SparksITCM,

Number one factor for selection...….sustained superior performance...….how far above the Reporting Senior Cumulative Average (RSCA) was your Individual Trait Average (ITA) on your eval. You can see how well you stack up by going to BOL and clicking the ODC, OSR, PSR, ESR link. After you open that click on the evaluation summary (1996-Present). At the top left of your screen you will see a box that says generate PDF. Once you open the document it's going to create your performance summary report.

I hope many see this post.

Recommended by Tony

0 reactions

Go to this post
Guest osiris0107

Guest osiris0107

Posted
Posted

Not going to display the email here, but I have official correspondence that states the board adjourned last Friday and that it usually take 10 business days from adjourning to be at the triad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

LSHARP
LSHARP

There are certain terms and phrases used on evaluations that if you see you should question and immediately request a CMC CDB. Anything that alludes to the future will be looked at as if you are not r

Ord3i
Ord3i

This is why this forum is so important.  the amount of knowledge and support is incredible

HMtoCTN
HMtoCTN

Good luck in that test board today 😂

Ord3i Enthusiast

Ord3i

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, osiris0107 said:

Not going to display the email here, but I have official correspondence that states the board adjourned last Friday and that it usually take 10 business days from adjourning to be at the triad.

THE PLOT THICKENS

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest PO Theo

Guest PO Theo

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, osiris0107 said:

Not going to display the email here, but I have official correspondence that states the board adjourned last Friday and that it usually take 10 business days from adjourning to be at the triad.

For future reference... anyone with reasonably trustworthy information that they don't want to post publicly can give it to Tony. He does a good job of screening it for legitimacy and then posting it to the board. It's not much, but it gives a lot of us some hope!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest navyordie123

Guest navyordie123

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, osiris0107 said:

 

Also the selectee total is 4598. So, good luck to those seeking one of those spots.

where did you get that total from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest MILSPOUSE01

Guest MILSPOUSE01

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, osiris0107 said:

Not going to display the email here, but I have official correspondence that states the board adjourned last Friday and that it usually take 10 business days from adjourning to be at the triad.

Thanks for the info!

In past years, once the board adjourned how long before results were at triad? I've tried to find this out and having no luck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest navyordie123

Guest navyordie123

Posted
Posted
Just now, MILSPOUSE01 said:

Thanks for the info!

In past years, once the board adjourned how long before results were at triad? I've tried to find this out and having no luck. 

it all depends, sometimes everything goes smooth and they get them out faster and sometimes they don't. even if the board adjourned early. with the 6 week window for the season, it would probably still put the results being released around the end of July or the first few days of August. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest AME1

Guest AME1

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, Sierra Hotel One said:

I think it's no longer mandatory to conduct a CBD for non selects but when I did mine the CCC and my senior chief said that it really helps on your eval when BLK 39 LEADERSHIP is 5.0. My next two evals I made sure I got 5.0 in that catagory. 

I was out there for a 9 month tour and I'd have to say it was the best deployment I've been on. I counted 31 IDF attacks while I was there and I can still hear those FOB alarms going off! Thankfully nobody from my group was KIA but we did have one artillary shell go through the T-wall and almost hit one of our towers. 

I didn't count the IDF's.  However I do know it was twice on Christmas, as that was my "maintenance" day.  Didn't have any shells hit near our little FOB, they always went for the airfield and not the prison.  Was also a 9 month in country tour.  Wasn't bad, but Iraq was a little better for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest AME1

Guest AME1

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Ord3i said:

that number is quite a few shy of the 4,744 quotas

They must not have felt they had enough qualified candidates to fill all of the quotas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Submarinecook1stclass

Guest Submarinecook1stclass

Posted
Posted

talking about the score process earlier,

what ive been told by a master chief who sat a couple boards, is that one what is worth points changes each board, some things are worth more one year and others another. how ever he also said that everything about you is worth points, and he followed up with every board is different because no board has the same people on it, which means they have different point of views of how they look at records. so some one who sat a board a year ago can give advise on how there board was, but it may not be exactly the same as the one this year.

Good luck everyone. heating up with what looks like the board adjourned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HMtoCTN Community Regular

HMtoCTN

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, jake_IT1 said:

Alright guys, I've lurked enough. 

After looking through the last few years of the scheduled adjourn date, and the NAVADMIN release date (because there isn't really anything else that can be done until the results come out) the average time is 2 weeks. 

15JUL16-3AUG16: 2 1/2 Weeks
21JUL17-4AUG17: 2 Weeks
20JUL18-8AUG18: 2 1/2 Weeks

If they follow the trend, we'll have the results either the 1st of August, or the 6th.

The board adjourned a week before the 20jul18 scheduled date last year so it was over 3 weeks before results were released

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest jake_IT1

Guest jake_IT1

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, PO1(IW/FMF) said:

The board adjourned a week before the 20jul18 scheduled date last year so it was over 3 weeks before results were released

True, but I was writing that out as spelled out in the navadmin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest AME1

Guest AME1

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, LS1(EXW/SW/AW) said:

Delete if not allowed...  I'd like to start a discussion topic.  Which rates do you all think did not select to quota?  Have you all noticed a pattern in this specific incident?

I haven't payed close attention to it, but I think for the most part they fill all available quotas.  I think it's honestly hard to pick which rate didn't fill all quotas.  For instance the AME rate is making 12 Chiefs out of I think I saw 86 board eligible firsts.  Other rates have hundreds of candidates to choose from.  It also depends on the board, and if they feel they do or don't have enough qualified candidates to fill the quotas.  To many variables to consider, but that's just my opinion on that topic.  Good question though, and might spark some good conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LS_Chief Contributor

LS_Chief

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, AME1 said:

I haven't payed close attention to it, but I think for the most part they fill all available quotas.  I think it's honestly hard to pick which rate didn't fill all quotas.  For instance the AME rate is making 12 Chiefs out of I think I saw 86 board eligible firsts.  Other rates have hundreds of candidates to choose from.  It also depends on the board, and if they feel they do or don't have enough qualified candidates to fill the quotas.  To many variables to consider, but that's just my opinion on that topic.  Good question though, and might spark some good conversation.

Just trying to entice all these ' lurkers to join in the convo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest DocEddy8404

Guest DocEddy8404

Posted
Posted

When considering adverse info, when does the 5 year period begin? Is it 5 years from the day your package is viewed? Or 5 years from your last eval. I was NJPd in August of 2012 and it was documented on my periodic eval in March 2013. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HMtoCTN Community Regular

HMtoCTN

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, LS1(EXW/SW/AW) said:

Delete if not allowed...  I'd like to start a discussion topic.  Which rates do you all think did not select to quota?  Have you all noticed a pattern in this specific incident?

My rating (CTN) has a 48.6% (89) quota with 183 eligible. I’d be surprised if they used them all. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest navyordie123

Guest navyordie123

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, OrdieLife said:

Good numbers this year for us pretty sure we will use them all good luck bro 

Good luck to you too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 🧧 Activity Stream

    1. 0

      How sexual harassment and the shipyard crippled a Navy warship

      How can this happen on a Navy ship? By the time the junior officer emailed her peers in March 2022, reminding them to do their jobs and protect their sailors from each other, the men and women of the Navy destroyer Bulkeley had suffered through a rough couple of years. The warship had entered a maintenance and modernization stint in March 2019 that was expected to last 15 months. But Bulkeley didn’t leave the Virginia shipyard until June 2021, more than two years later.
      Tony in Mental Health
    2. 0

      HEALTH OF THE FORCE SURVEY

      Supervisors, junior personnel are under represented in these surveys. If you can convince the junior Sailors to fill out this survey, it may do some good. CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED// ROUTINE R 061317Z MAY 24 MID120001081720U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 093/24 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/MAY// SUBJ/HEALTH OF THE FORCE SURVEY// RMKS/1. Request all personnel currently on Active Duty participate in the Navy's annual Health of the Force (HoF) survey. This voluntary and confidential survey will remain open from 6 May to 30 June 2024 and can be accessed on military or personal computers or a mobile device at: https://usnavy.gov1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_38kK5mRgGsuARIq or by using the QR code listed in the Fact Sheet attached to this NAVADMIN. 2. Command Triads are expected to lead by example, encourage their personnel to take the survey, and when able, enable completion as part of a normal work day. Junior personnel are normally underrepresented in HoF results and on- duty completion is a best practice to encourage their participation. The results of the survey are personally briefed to the Chief of Naval Operations. 3. To access the survey, participants will be asked to provide their Department of Defense Identification number. This information is only used to limit participation to Active Duty Navy personnel and minimize unnecessary demographic questions. At no point will the answers be linked back to the individual. 4. HoF data is critical to assessing Navy's implementation of Culture of Excellence 2.0 and allows the assessment of key measures over time. Specifically, HoF survey is used: a. To produce Navy's annual HoF report. The 2023 report is located at: https://www.mynavyhr.navy.mil/Portals/55/Reference/Publications/CY23 Health %20of%20the%20Force%20Report.pdf?ver=WHbsCTZ3wzR-NBgzyQa-3Q%3d%3d. b. To provide data for Navy's Health of Community briefs, where community leads brief the Chief of Naval Operations every 12 to 18 months on the status of their communities. c. To assess the impact of Quality of Service initiatives, and how Navy policies are effecting Sailor personal and professional lives. 5. Every year, the HoF survey includes a core set of metrics relating to a Sailor's work environment and well-being. On even years, to include 2024, the survey also includes questions about personal issues such as work/life integration, family planning, parenting in the Navy, access to medical care, physical fitness programs, on-base services, and communication within the Navy. 6. In addition to this NAVADMIN, Sailors with a valid email address in Navy Standard Integrated Personnel System should receive an email with details on how to access the survey. 7. The point of contact is the Office of Engagement and Innovation (OPNAV N176), Dr. Jen Jebo at Jennifer.l.jebo.civ@us.navy.mil. 8. This NAVADMIN will remain in effect until 1 August 2024. 9. Released by Vice Admiral Richard J. Cheeseman, Jr., N1.// BT #0001 NNNN CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED//
      Tony in Mental Health
    3. 0

      Server Disruptions

      There may be a few disruptions as I continue to enhance the server. This chaos is pre-planned so nothing to worry about.
      Tony in Help & Guidelines
×
×
  • Create New...
Forum Home
www.NavyAdvancement.com
Boots | Navy Patches
Serving enlisted, veterans, spouses & family