Jump to content
Navy Forum for Enlisted, Reserves, Veterans, Chiefs & Spouses

FY18 Chief Selection Board

Tony
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest AME1

Guest AME1

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, deepseadmt97 said:

Here is a question for the group that comes up all the time. When they say that pay increments are by seniority".... is that seniority in the TIR or time in service or......

I've always been told it goes by TIR so those that have been a first the longest get paid first.  I've roughly looked up selectee's on FLTMPS, and the first 3 or 4 were ranked via TIR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

LSHARP
LSHARP

Let's go getting ready for next year.  LS here: 9 years in this in going to be my 2nd time up Sailorization throughout my Evals, SEJPME, PPME, surface and air warfare qualed, 2813,9590,3001,2829,

SK2006
SK2006

It was a good exam.  Easier then I expected. Hope everyone else did well!

Tony
Tony

I kinda' heard different. There can't be a lot of packages with SSP, otherwise there wouldn't be anything superior to choose. From what I've heard more than once, it's more of a vetting process o

Tony

Tony

Posted
  • Author
Posted
18 minutes ago, Riverine Rat said:

Where does the message come out about the timeline? I've heard of it but never seen where it gets posted. 

Not sure. And I had a copy some time back, and said "here is an example" but don't remember where I got it. :huh:

Hopefully, someone has more info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Christyl

Guest Christyl

Posted
Posted

I posted this a while back! It was originally posted by NDC on here. 

 


FY-2001, NAVADMIN 198/00 — 08/04/00 — Friday
FY-2002, NAVADMIN 197/01 — 08/03/01 — Friday 
FY-2003, NAVADMIN 238/02 — 08/02/02 — Friday 
FY-2004, NAVADMIN 218/03 — 08/06/03 — Wednesday 
FY-2005, NAVADMIN 173/04 — 07/28/04 — Wednesday 
FY-2006, NAVADMIN 183/05 — 07/28/05 — Thursday 
FY-2007, NAVADMIN 221/06 — 08/04/06 — Friday 
FY-2008, NAVADMIN 196/07 — 08/08/07 — Wednesday 
FY-2009, NAVADMIN 213/08 — 08/01/08 — Friday 
FY-2010, NAVADMIN 230/09 — 07/31/09 — Friday 
FY-2011, NAVADMIN 269/10 — 08/11/10 — Wednesday 
FY-2012, NAVADMIN 233/11 — 08/01/11 — Monday 
FY-2013, NAVADMIN 232/12 — 07/31/12 — Tuesday 
FY-2014, NAVADMIN 193/13 — 08/01/13 — Thursday 
FY-2015, NAVADMIN 178/14 — 08/05/14 — Tuesday
FY-2016, NAVADMIN 184/15 — 08/06/15 — Thursday

FY-2017, NAVADMIN 173/16 -    08/03/16 - Wednesday 

 

Released within the last 4 days of Jul: 23.5%
Released within the first 6 days of Aug: 64.7%
Released after the 7th day of Aug: 11.7%

 

NAVADMIN Release:

Release on a Monday: 5%  

Release on a Tuesday: 11.7%
Release on a Wednesday: 29.4%
Release on a Thursday: 17.6%
Release on a Friday: 35.2%

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Intel

Guest Intel

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Christyl said:

I posted this a while back! It was originally posted by NDC on here. 

 

 

My money was on August 3rd as it is.  I'm on leave, either way.  Taking a few days to get my head right.  I recommend everyone do the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest DeepSea_IDC

Guest DeepSea_IDC

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, deepseadmt97 said:

Here is a question for the group that comes up all the time. When they say that pay increments are by seniority".... is that seniority in the TIR or time in service or......

Based on TIR. Who ever has been a first the longest, gets paid first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Christyl

Guest Christyl

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, HawkISback said:

I like the upgrade of the site tony. 

Yes!!!! Tony you should run admin at the boards and maybe things wouldn't have had admin erorrs! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest CTRC(IW/SW/AW)

Guest CTRC(IW/SW/AW)

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, deepseadmt97 said:

Here is a question for the group that comes up all the time. When they say that pay increments are by seniority".... is that seniority in the TIR or time in service or......

It's based off of time in rate. Aka, how many years you were a first class. The number next to your name on the list indicates where you fall out based off of your time in rate. If your towards the top, you'll get paid early and at the bottom, you might have to wait till August 16th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest IS1(IW/SW/AW/EXW)

Guest IS1(IW/SW/AW/EXW)

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, CTRC(IW/SW/AW) said:

It's based off of time in rate. Aka, how many years you were a first class. The number next to your name on the list indicates where you fall out based off of your time in rate. If your towards the top, you'll get paid early and at the bottom, you might have to wait till August 16th.

So since I made First in 2003...does that mean I'll get back-pay?

:bigemo_harabe_net-76:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest PR1de

Guest PR1de

Posted
Posted

Well,  it's 1351 on the 27th here in Japan.  The only thing that I have been able to do today is go back and forth in my self-doubt.  We are doing a 2-mile CPO 365 Honor Run with all of the tenant commands here on-base tomorrow morning as a way to have that final get-together before Phase II.  Hopefully, it won't be my last run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Rob

Guest Rob

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Tony said:

No, we would have been notified of the release to Triad. It would then be release 24 hours later to the public.

I know that...My Chiefs have been joking with us all week about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tony

Tony

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 hours ago, RonnieGee said:

That's what I thought, but then there's the possibility that they may release to triads in the morning and post navy-wide Friday. 

I know at this point it's all speculation. I'm just ready to know. 

I don't think so, they would have to announce that they are releasing the public copy in less than 24 hours. That is part of the current timeline. 24 hours Triad, then public release.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, AME1 said:

Only thing I've heard is the first weekend after results is fairly lax to let you have one last weekend at home before the games fully begin.  Only heard this on the board so like already said it could depend on where you are going through the season.

Nope.  You will have tasking th first weekend even if the results come out on Friday.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tony

Tony

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Don't forget folks!!

Members who add a profile picture NOW are eligible to win a 6++ month  PAID
vacation on a grey ship with a voyage to internationally renown hot spots!! And I'm NOT talking about MIAMI!!!

Add your profile pic today!!

:128_19:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest HawkISback

Guest HawkISback

Posted
Posted

I am not a fan of math, mostly because I suck at it. The unknown data point in the trend of triad and public release is what drove them to release on a Friday and does that still exist today? I.E. faith that personnel will not react irresponsible with liberty.  I'm not so sure they have that faith in us.  Additionally, the unknown is does there have to be an advanced notice period for the TRIADS?  It's not like you will be able to get the BOL access in less than 24 hours if you don't have it. That access is a pain. If it's not this week I would wager they might just drop them at the same time if they intend to have six weeks for the initiation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest NavyChic

Guest NavyChic

Posted
Posted

Morning!! 

I had a dream last night that I was Selected. It was clear as day not sure how to feel about it.

Then I get a text from a friend saying good morning and good luck on selections! 

AD here and I'm just ready to know already!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest PO14Life

Guest PO14Life

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, NavyChic said:

Morning!! 

I had a dream last night that I was Selected. It was clear as day not sure how to feel about it.

Then I get a text from a friend saying good morning and good luck on selections! 

AD here and I'm just ready to know already!

I hate those dreams, makes me feel like I'm setup to get my hopes up. I hope you get the S though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest HawkISback

Guest HawkISback

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, PO14Life said:

I hate those dreams, makes me feel like I'm setup to get my hopes up. I hope you get the S though!

My mission this cycle was to remain grounded and not get too hopeful.  It's getting harder the closer we get. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tony

Tony

Posted
  • Author
Posted
21 minutes ago, HawkISback said:

I am not a fan of math, mostly because I suck at it. The unknown data point in the trend of triad and public release is what drove them to release on a Friday and does that still exist today? I.E. faith that personnel will not react irresponsible with liberty.  I'm not so sure they have that faith in us.  Additionally, the unknown is does there have to be an advanced notice period for the TRIADS?  It's not like you will be able to get the BOL access in less than 24 hours if you don't have it. That access is a pain. If it's not this week I would wager they might just drop them at the same time if they intend to have six weeks for the initiation. 

Well, the last time it was done on a Friday was 2009. Christyl posted a copy a few post back. Even before that I remember the chatter about "not releasing on a Friday" but there were still some releases. Don't know...

As far as the advance release for Triad, I think it is inconsistent. Not sure if they do it all the time (actually pretty sure) and I can't remember it being a requirement anyway. A while back, not many on this forum were aware of the notice so I posted a copy. I later realized that they don't give notice every time or maybe I couldn't find the copies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest NavyChic

Guest NavyChic

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, PO14Life said:

I hate those dreams, makes me feel like I'm setup to get my hopes up. I hope you get the S though!

Thanks, I hope you get the S too. I know, my goal this year was to not get anxious but that didn't happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest PO14Life

Guest PO14Life

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, HawkISback said:

My mission this cycle was to remain grounded and not get too hopeful.  It's getting harder the closer we get. 

Especially with the "I hope you make it" comments

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 🧧 Activity Stream

    1. 0

      ACTIVE COMPONENT FISCAL YEAR 2024 AVIATION DEPARTMENT HEAD RETENTION BONUS

      CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED// ROUTINE R 021447Z MAY 24 MID120001072049U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 092/24 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/MAY// SUBJ/ACTIVE COMPONENT FISCAL YEAR 2024 AVIATION DEPARTMENT HEAD RETENTION BONUS// REF/A/DOC/SECNAV/6FEB18// REF/B/DOC/OPNAV/1OCT19// NARR/REF A IS SECNAVINST 7220.88, AVIATION INCENTIVE PAYS AND BONUS PROGRAM. REF B IS OPNAVINST 7220.18A, AVIATION INCENTIVE PAY AND BONUS PROGRAM.// RMKS/1. This NAVADMIN announces the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 Aviation Department Head Retention Bonus (ADHRB). The FY24 Aviation Command Retention Bonus (ACRB) will be addressed via a separate NAVADMIN. 2. A vital part of developing a total force strategy and maintaining combat readiness is to provide appropriate incentives to retain skilled personnel for critical Naval Aviation Enterprise (NAE) billets. The Active Component (AC) Aviation Bonus (AvB) program, consisting of the ADHRB and ACRB, incentivizes highly talented, hard-working, career-minded Naval aviators and Naval Flight Officers (NFO) to choose to remain on Active Duty. Our return on investment is the retention for continued Navy service of our aviation warfighters, with their invaluable, irreplaceable skillsets and leadership. 3. AC ADHRB: a. Capable and dedicated department heads are vital to mission effectiveness and represent the important link between senior leadership and junior personnel. Retaining the experience and talent associated with those eligible to serve as aviation department heads greatly benefits the continued success of the NAE. b. The AC ADHRB eligibility criterion includes selection for Lieutenant Commander (LCDR) and the FY24 ADHRB is intended for officers selected for promotion to LCDR in the FY24 LCDR statutory board. These officers will be considered for department head in the FY25 Aviation Department Head Screen Board (ADHSB) scheduled to convene in the spring of 2024. Additionally, eligible officers must have an Active Duty Service Obligation (ADSO) associated with undergraduate flight training ending in FY20 or later. Please consult the program information for a full listing of eligibility criteria. The application opportunity commences with the release of this NAVADMIN and closes on 31 August 2024. c. Contracts are offered with either a three, five or seven-year obligation that begins upon expiration of the officers winging ADSO or contract approval, whichever is later. The intent is to provide flexibility when making career decisions and to encourage officers to fulfill a department head tour and continue Naval service. d. The Navy values an early commitment and a seven-year obligation. An officer who submits a five or seven-year contract prior to the ADHSB results being published will receive the maximum annual rate specific to their type/model/series and designator (T/M/S+D). If an officer prefers a three- year contract or wishes to wait until the ADHSB selection results are public, the ADHRB annual amount reduces by up $10,000 per year for the tier at $40,000 per year, and $5,000 per year for the tiers at $35,000 and under, T/M/S dependent. e. While all aviators that complete milestone assignments are equally valued, specific T/M/S+D rates vary according to respective community inventory health. Those communities experiencing the greatest retention challenges are incentivized with the highest rates. AC ADHRB retention bonus pay rates in U.S. dollars for FY24 include: Seven-year obligation, early rate: HM Pilot $30,000/year ($210,000 total) HSC Pilot $30,000/year ($210,000 total) HSM Pilot $30,000/year ($210,000 total) VAQ Pilot $40,000/year ($280,000 total) VAQ NFO $35,000/year ($245,000 total) VAW Pilot $40,000/year ($280,000 total) VAW NFO $15,000/year ($105,000 total) VRM Pilot $40,000/year ($280,000 total) VFA Pilot $40,000/year ($280,000 total) VFA NFO $25,000/year ($175,000 total) VP/VQ(P) Pilot $40,000/year ($280,000 total) VP/VQ(P) NFO $15,000/year ($105,000 total) VQ(T) Pilot $40,000/year ($280,000 total) VQ(T) NFO $25,000/year ($175,000 total) Seven-year obligation, standard rate: HM Pilot $25,000/year ($175,000 total) HSC Pilot $25,000/year ($175,000 total) HSM Pilot $25,000/year ($175,000 total) VAQ Pilot $30,000/year ($210,000 total) VAQ NFO $30,000/year ($210,000 total) VAW Pilot $30,000/year ($210,000 total) VAW NFO $10,000/year ($70,000 total) VRM Pilot $30,000/year ($210,000 total) VFA Pilot $30,000/year ($210,000 total) VFA NFO $20,000/year ($140,000 total) VP/VQ(P) Pilot $30,000/year ($210,000 total) VP/VQ(P) NFO $10,000/year ($70,000 total) VQ(T) Pilot $30,000/year ($210,000 total) VQ(T) NFO $20,000/year ($140,000 total) Five-year obligation, early rate: HM Pilot $30,000/year ($150,000 total) HSC Pilot $30,000/year ($150,000 total) HSM Pilot $30,000/year ($150,000 total) VAQ Pilot $40,000/year ($200,000 total) VAQ NFO $35,000/year ($175,000 total) VAW Pilot $40,000/year ($200,000 total) VAW NFO $15,000/year ($75,000 total) VRM Pilot $40,000/year ($200,000 total) VFA Pilot $40,000/year ($200,000 total) VFA NFO $25,000/year ($125,000 total) VP/VQ(P) Pilot $40,000/year ($200,000 total) VP/VQ(P) NFO $15,000/year ($75,000 total) VQ(T) Pilot $40,000/year ($200,000 total) VQ(T) NFO $25,000/year ($125,000 total) Five-year obligation, standard rate: HM Pilot $25,000/year ($125,000 total) HSC Pilot $25,000/year ($125,000 total) HSM Pilot $25,000/year ($125,000 total) VAQ Pilot $30,000/year ($150,000 total) VAQ NFO $30,000/year ($150,000 total) VAW Pilot $30,000/year ($150,000 total) VAW NFO $10,000/year ($50,000 total) VRM Pilot $30,000/year ($150,000 total) VFA Pilot $30,000/year ($150,000 total) VFA NFO $20,000/year ($100,000 total) VP/VQ(P) Pilot $30,000/year ($150,000 total) VP/VQ(P) NFO $10,000/year ($50,000 total) VQ(T) Pilot $30,000/year ($150,000 total) VQ(T) NFO $20,000/year ($100,000 total) Three-year obligation: HM Pilot $25,000/year ($75,000 total) HSC Pilot $25,000/year ($75,000 total) HSM Pilot $25,000/year ($75,000 total) VAQ Pilot $30,000/year ($90,000 total) VAQ NFO $30,000/year ($90,000 total) VAW Pilot $30,000/year ($90,000 total) VAW NFO $10,000/year ($30,000 total) VRM Pilot $30,000/year ($90,000 total) VFA Pilot $30,000/year ($90,000 total) VFA NFO $20,000/year ($60,000 total) VP/VQ(P) Pilot $30,000/year ($90,000 total) VP/VQ(P) NFO $10,000/year ($30,000 total) VQ(T) Pilot $30,000/year ($90,000 total) VQ(T) NFO $20,000/year ($60,000 total) Location Incentive: Eligible for only Japan, Lemoore, and Guam: HSC $5,000/year (max $35,000 total) HSM $5,000/year (max $35,000 total) VAQ Pilot $10,000/year (max $70,000 total) VAQ NFO $5,000/year (max $35,000 total) VAW Pilot $10,000/year (max $70,000 total) VAW NFO $5,000/year (max $35,000 total) VRM Pilot $10,000/year (max $70,000 total) VFA Pilot $10,000/year (max $70,000 total) VFA NFO $5,000/year (max $35,000 total) 4. Additional AvB Information: a. Officers accepting AvB contracts are not precluded from participating in the Career Intermission Program (CIP). Officers interested in both AvB and CIP should contact the AvB program manager and their detailer for more information. b. For further AvB details, eligibility and application procedures, visit MyNavy Portal at https://www.mynavyhr.navy.mil/Career- Management/Detailing/Officer/Pers-43-Aviation/OCM/AvB-The-Bonus/. 5. AvB Points of Contact: a. For application questions, please contact Ms. Melinda Weeden at (901) 874-3964, DSN 882-3964, or e-mail melinda.s.weeden.civ@us.navy.mil or Mr. Paul Boundy at (901) 874-3947, DSN 882-3947, or e-mail paul.g.boundy.civ@us.navy.mi. b. For policy questions please contact the AvB program manager at (901) 874-3484, DSN 882-3484, or e-mail avipandavb@navy.mil. 6. This NAVADMIN will remain in effect until superseded or 31 August 2024, whichever occurs first. 7. Released by Vice Admiral Richard J. Cheeseman, Jr., N1.// BT #0001 NNNN CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED//
      Tony in Navy Officer
    2. 0

      FY-25 NAVY RESERVE CAPTAIN LINE SELECTIONS

      CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED// ROUTINE R 021437Z MAY 24 MID600117401874U FM SECNAV WASHINGTON DC TO ALNAV INFO SECNAV WASHINGTON DC CNO WASHINGTON DC CMC WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS ALNAV 040/24 MSGID/GENADMIN/SECNAV WASHINGTON DC/MAY// SUBJ/FY-25 NAVY RESERVE CAPTAIN LINE SELECTIONS// REF/A/DOC/SECNAV/25JAN24// AMPN/REF A IS THE FY-25 NAVY RESERVE CAPTAIN LINE PROMOTION SELECTION BOARDS CONVENING ORDER.// RMKS/1. I am pleased to announce the following line officers on the Reserve Active-Status List for permanent promotion to the grade of captain. 2. This message is not authority to deliver appointments. Authority to effect promotion will normally be issued by future NAVADMINs requiring NAVPERS 1421/7 preparation and forwarding of document to PERS-806. 3. Frocking is not authorized for any officer listed below until specific authorization is received per SECNAVINST 1420.2B. 4. For proper alphabetical order read from left to right on each line. The numbers following each name to the right indicate the relative seniority among selectees within each competitive category. Note: An (*) by the name indicates the selectee was merit reordered to the top of the promotion list in accordance with reference (a). Members are directed to verify their select status via BUPERS Online. Unrestricted Line Adkins William L 0046 Anderson Timothy Willi 0020 Baca Maile Yuen 0019 Bauer Bonnie Rae 0015 Behrens Micah P 0022 Bocchino Michael A 0037 Brkic Josip Ivan 0023 Burel Kevin James * 0003 Cole Cory W 0032 Collins Mark Damon 0027 Conklin Shannon Elizab 0021 Corrado Jonathan Kinca 0060 Craig Kathleen E 0025 Cunningham Kelleigh An 0017 Denyer Darren E 0050 Dewey Taylor B * 0001 Diekemper Joseph 0010 Donabella Christopher 0013 Fong Edward Hsiang Lun 0056 Frampton Irene L 0036 Gilpin Kathleen Marie * 0005 Gow Joel Andrew * 0006 Gray Darby R * 0008 Hans Jordan Nicholas 0058 Harrington John Willia 0042 Hemminger Andrew Gusta 0039 Hickman Steven Paul 0026 Holmes Nathaniel David 0052 Johnson Erick Ralph 0016 Ketchum Jacqueline Mar 0057 King Patrick Thomas 0059 King Ryan M 0043 Lafleur William R II 0038 Lewis Jason M 0048 Lostetter Joshua James 0029 Lucas Brian K 0040 Mahoney Amanda J 0055 Meeuf Ryan W * 0009 Missler James Michael Jr 0047 Monaghan Michael Phill 0014 Nevel Laura M * 0007 Nguyen Anvy 0033 Nguyen Long Tuong 0045 Petrucelli Joseph A I 0030 Pollak William Francis IV 0031 Porco Johnathan D 0035 Porfirio Michael Angel 0034 Quinn Justin Kiah 0049 Reyes Robert Catane 0041 Ritchie Phillip Dean 0028 Romero Matthew James * 0002 Seitz Melissa Ann 0051 Sorenson Gregory E 0054 Tabinga Brian Keith 0011 Truesdell Daniel B 0012 Turner Kathleen Novak 0024 Vanderlinde Andrew Cha 0018 Walker Kathryn D * 0004 Walsh Marilyn A 0044 Willard David John 0053 Unrestricted Line (TAR) Bogan Robert Anthony 0003 Busse Matthew M 0012 Horton Thomas Shane 0010 Johnson Kyle Jesse 0009 Labissiere Christopher 0016 Leggett Heath Correll 0011 Moravan Melissa A Arms 0013 Otten Annie J 0014 Sagona Brian S 0006 Seals Jamis Merjae 0007 Sellers Edwin S * 0002 Sparks Brian Patrick 0008 Stump John Morgan 0004 Tilden James D 0015 Woodward Robert Dougla 0005 Special Duty Officer (Human Resources) Bangham Ryan T * 0001 Special Duty Officer (Human Resources) (TAR) Chinn Michael A 0004 Kim Asa D 0003 Thomas Kyle Brent 0002 Uhlir Shane D * 0001 Engineering Duty Officer James Ronald Leslie 0004 Nagao Reid Hikaru * 0001 Nguyen Chuong Thieu 0005 Pavlovic Erin Kim 0002 Perezsanfeliz Noel Ant 0006 Woodard Daniel Joseph 0003 Aerospace Engineering Duty Officer (Engineering) Fleming Robert James * 0001 Stewart Joseph John 0002 Aerospace Engineering Duty Officer (Maintenance) Kirby Noreen Patricia * 0001 Tackitt Patrick Duane 0002 Aerospace Engineering Duty Officer (Maintenance) (TAR) Lee Byron M * 0001 Special Duty Officer (Public Affairs) Bedy Aaron Joseph * 0001 Cregan Thomas Scot 0002 Melendez Nicolas Anton 0003 Special Duty Officer (Strategic Sealift Officer) Deusanio Vincent Jr 0003 Hahn Eric Thomas 0002 Wright John Travis * 0001 Yesko Stefan Charles 0004 Special Duty Officer (Foreign Area) Choe Sunghwan Terry 0002 Driver Melanie Ann * 0001 Special Duty Officer (Oceanography) Williams Catherine E * 0001 Special Duty Officer (Cryptologic Warfare) Basso Michael Richard 0003 Collins Adam Quentin 0002 Fulkerson Stephen Dale 0004 Pickett Aaron Dell * 0001 Special Duty Officer (Information Professional) Berger Daniel William 0002 Silverstein Jeremy R * 0001 Stimson Jared M 0003 Special Duty Officer (Intelligence) Anderson Kyle Lee 0008 Bergquist Allison M 0010 Brittingham John Macdo 0007 Cole James Bradford 0006 Crawford Greg Allen 0005 Kharkar Gautam Ravi * 0001 Kiersztyn Danielle Hel 0009 Linhardt Clifford Alan 0003 Mcguire Andrew R 0004 Walton John Claiborne 0002 Zecchin Craig A 0011 Limited Duty Officer (Line) Aldridge Scott Frank 0002 Smith Michael Paul * 0001 5. Released by the Honorable Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the Navy.// BT #0001 NNNN CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED//
      Tony in Navy Officer
    3. 0

      Almost all Navy shipbuilding is hopelessly behind schedule

      It has too few ships to do the jobs it is expected to do and not enough money to build new vessels. But it gets worse: It is also handicapped by a civilian ship-building industry that makes promises it knows it cannot keep.
      Tony in Navy Ships, Subs, Aircraft - Research and Technology
×
×
  • Create New...
Forum Home
www.NavyAdvancement.com
Boots | Navy Patches
Serving enlisted, veterans, spouses & family