Tony

The military failed to keep up with the mushrooming number of measures that Congress has required the armed services to implement to address sexual assault, a government watchdog revealed. As of October 2021, the Defense Department had not fully implemented 18% of the nearly 200 unique requirements imposed in legislation since 2004, the Government Accountability Office found in a report published this week.

THE PENTAGON – The nine Freedom-class Littoral Combat Ships currently in Navy service – the youngest of which commissioned in 2020 – have been marked for disposal as part of the Department of Defense’s Fiscal Year 2023 budget proposal, USNI News has learned. The ships – USS Fort Worth (LCS-3), USS Milwaukee (LCS-5), USS Detroit (LCS-7), USS Little Rock (LCS-9), USS Sioux City (LCS-11), USS Wichita (LCS-13), USS Billings (LCS-15) and USS St. Louis (LCS-19) – are part of the 24 ships the service has chosen to decommission in FY 2023 for an estimated $3.6 billion in savings.

Alrighty then, 11 EST is passed and gone...

On Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court froze an injunction that would have required the Navy to deploy SEALs who refuse to get vaccinated against COVID-19. The decision suggests that SCOTUS has little patience for lower courts’ efforts to seize authority from the armed forces by inserting themselves into the chain of command. One such recent ruling barred the Navy from reassigning the commanding officer of a guided-missile destroyer, an anti-vaxxer who repeatedly defied lawful orders and recklessly exposed dozens to the virus. High-ranking military officials testified that decisions like these undermined military readiness and threatened national security.

UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 291255Z MAR 22 MID200001617351U FM CHINFO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 078/22 SUBJ: CY 2021 WINNER ANNOUNCEMENT FOR RUSSELL EGNOR NAVY MEDIA AWARDS AND THOMPSON-RAVITZ AWARDS FOR EXCELLENCE IN NAVY PUBLIC AFFAIRS PROGRAMS// REF/A/DOC/CHINFOINST 5305.3A// REF/B/DOC/RUSSELL EGNOR NAVY MEDIA AWARDS PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES CY 2021// REF/C/DOC/OPNAVINST 5305.7C// REF/D/DOC/CY 2021 THOMPSON-RAVITZ SUBMISSION GUIDELINES// NARR/REF A IS THE RUSSELL EGNOR NAVY MEDIA AWARDS (NMA) INSTRUCTION REF B IS THE RUSSELL EGNOR NAVY MEDIA AWARDS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR CY 2021 REF C IS THE THOMPSON-RAVITZ AWARDS FOR EXCELLENCE IN NAVY PUBLIC AFFAIRS INSTRUCTION REF D IS THE 2021 THOMPSON-RAVITZ SUBMISSION GUIDELINES// POC/RUSSELL EGNOR NAVY MEDIA AWARDS: MCCS STACEE MCCARROLL/ ANASTASIA.M.MCCARROLL.MIL(AT)US.NAVY.MIL/(757)695-5591/THOMPSON-RAVITZ AWARDS: MR. CHRISTOPHER DUNNE/CHRISTOPHER.T.DUNNE3.CIV(AT)US.NAVY.MIL/(703)693-1363// RMKS/1. The recipients of the 2021 Russell Egnor Navy Media Awards for Leadership and Production Excellence are: a. MC of the Year: MC1 Gabriel Kotico, USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) b. MC of the Year (Reserve): MC1 Aaron Chase, NR Navy Public Affairs Support Element West c. Junior MC of the Year: MC2 Ryan Breeden, Navy Public Affairs Support Element West d. Junior MC of the Year (Reserve): MCSN Christopher Thomas, NR Navy Public Affairs Support Element e. Navy Videographer of the Year: MC2 Jonathan Clay, Defense Media Activity - Navy Production f. Navy Civilian Videographer of the Year: Taylor Curry, Commander, Fleet Activities Yokosuka g. Navy Writer of the Year: MC2 Cameron Edy, USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) h. Navy Civilian Writer of the Year: Leslie Hull-Ryde, Military Sealift Command i. Navy Graphic Designer of the Year: MC2 Isabel Wences, NATO Allied Command Transformation j. Navy Civilian Graphic Designer of the Year: Taylor Curry, Commander, Fleet Activities Yokosuka k. Navy Photographer of the Year: MC1 Chris Williamson, NTAG Mid-America l. Navy Civilian Photographer of the Year: Taylor Curry, Commander, Fleet Activities Yokosuka m. Navy Communicator of the Year: MC2 Keith Wilson, Defense Media Activity - Navy Production 2. The recipients of the 2021 Russell Egnor Navy Media Awards in the unit categories are: a. U001: Print or Digital Publication 1st: The Navy Reservist, Commander, Navy Reserve Forces 2nd: Approach Magazine, Naval Safety Center 3rd: Ho'okele, Navy Region Hawaii b. U002: Online Publication 1st: Navigation NOFFS, Naval Service Training Command 2nd: The Merlion Star, Commander, Logistics Group Western Pacific c. U003: Web-based Informational Campaign 1st: COVID-19 Information Graphic Campaign, Defense Media Activity Operations Rota 2nd: SWCC Outreach Campaign, Naval Special Warfare Command d. U004: Audio Short-form Production 1st: Bahrain Beat October 21, 2021, Defense Media Activity Operations Bahrain 2nd: NAS Sigonella NMCRS Supports OAR, Defense Media Activity Operations Sigonella e. U005 Audio Long-Form Production 1st: NSWC Crane Four Score - Part 1, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division 2nd: Teaser for Tangents-RADM Huan Hguyen, Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division Newport 3rd: Morning Joe with the CO, Defense Media Activity Operations Rota f. U006: Video Short-form Production 1st: NSI 2021, Naval Service Training Command 2nd: Navy MilTax from Military OneSource, Defense Media Activity - Navy Production 3rd: Domestic Violence Awareness, Defense Media Activity Operations Rota g. U007: Video Long-form Production 1st: USS Arizona Relics, Defense Media Activity - Navy Production 2nd: Warrior Toughness Around the Fleet, Chief of Naval Personnel 3rd: Immediate Jaw Reconstruction, Naval Medical Center San Diego 3. The recipients of the 2021 Russell Egnor Navy Media Awards individual categories are: a. I002: Audio - Information Story 1st: MC2 Eric Zeak, Defense Media Activity Operations Sigonella 2nd: MC3 Lindsay Lair, Defense Media Activity Operations Bahrain 3rd: MC3 Conner Blake, Defense Media Activity Operations Rota b. I003: Audio - Spot 1st: MC3 Jacob Vernier, Defense Media Activity Operations Souda Bay 2nd: MC2 Analiss Candelaria, Defense Media Activity Operations Guantanamo 3rd: MC2 Anthony Collier, Defense Media Activity Operations Sigonella c. I004: Audio - Series 1st: MC1 Jordan KirkJohnson, Defense Media Activity Operations Sigonella d. I005: Graphic Design - Layout & Design 1st: MC2 Benjamin Davella, USS Wasp (LHD 1) 2nd: MC1 Michael Lee, USS Tripoli (LHD 7) 3rd: MCSA Joshua Sapien, USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) e. I006: Graphic Design - Digital Art 1st: Taylor Curry, Commander, Fleet Activities Yokosuka 2nd: MC1 Chris Williamson, Navy Talent Acquisition Group - Mid-America 3rd: MCC Diana Quinlan, Navy Talent Acquisition Group - Philadelphia f. I007: Graphic Design - Identity Design 1st: MC2 Benjamin Davella, USS Wasp (LHD 1) 2nd: MC2 Aaron Smith, USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) 3rd: Douglas Bedford, Navy Personnel Command g. I008: Graphic Design - Animation 1st: MC3 Diedre Marsac, USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) 2nd: Todd Dorsey, Visual Information Directorate - NMLPDC 3rd: David Todd, Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command h. I009: Photo - Feature 1st: MC2 Grant Grady, USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) 2nd: MC2 Jackson Adkins, USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) 3rd: MC3 Jesse Schwab, USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) i. I010: Photo - News 1st: MC1 Kegan Kay, Naval Air Station Sigonella 2nd: MC1 Madellin Hamm, Navy Region Mid-Atlantic 3rd: MC1 Eric Coffer, Navy Public Affairs Support Element East Det. Europe j. I011: Photo - Operational Photo Series 1st: MC1 Daniel Young, Defense Media Activity Operations Sigonella 2nd: MC2 Cody Hendrix, Navy Flight Demonstration Squadron 3rd: MC1 Eric Coffer, Navy Public Affairs Support Element East Det. Europe k. I012: Photo - Training Photo Series 1st: MC2 Nick Bauer, Navy Public Affairs Support Element West 2nd: MC1 Fred Gray IV, Navy Public Affairs Support Element East Det. Europe 3rd: MC1 Anna VanNuys, Office of the Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy l. I013: Photo - Photojournalism 1st: MC1 Chris Williamson, Navy Talent Acquisition Group - Mid-America 2nd: MC3 Molly Crawford, Navy Public Affairs Support Element West Det. Hawaii 3rd: MCC Holly Herline, Navy Region Hawaii m. I014: Photo - Series 1st: MC1 Rawad Madanat, Navy Public Affairs Support Element West 2nd: MC1 Spencer Fling, U.S. Navy Recruit Training Command 3rd: MC3 Drace Wilson, Navy Public Affairs Support Element West n. I015: Photo - Portrait 1st: MCSN Sawyer Connally, Navy Public Affairs Support Element East 2nd: MC1 Camillo Fernan, U.S. Navy Recruit Training Command 3rd: MC2 Keith Wilson, Defense Media Activity - Navy Production o. I016: Video - Feature 1st: MC1 Somers Steelman, USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) 2nd: MC1 Terence Guerrero, USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) 3rd: MC2 Hayden Smith, USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) p. I017: Video - Information Story 1st: MC1 Sean Castellano, Chief of Naval Operations 2nd: MC2 Jonathan Clay, Defense Media Activity - Navy Production 3rd: MC2 Kashif Bashiat, Defense Media Activity - Navy Production q. I018: Video - Multimedia Product 1st: MCSN Kelly Meyer, Defense Media Activity Operations Okinawa 2nd: MC2 Daniel Charest, Defense Media Activity Operations Naples 3rd: MC2 Jacob Milham, Commander, Naval Surface Force Atlantic r. I019: Video - Operational Videography 1st: MC2 Jonathan Clay, Defense Media Activity - Navy Production 2nd: MC2 Omar Rubi, Navy Public Affairs Support Element West 3rd: MC1 Robert Blaylock, Navy Flight Demonstration Squadron s. I020: Video - Training Video 1st: Thomas Webster, Visual Information Directorate - NMLPDC 2nd: MC1 Arthurgwain Marquez, Commander, Navy Reserve Forces 3rd: MC2 Greg Hall, Commander, Submarine Force U.S. Pacific Fleet t. I021: Video - Video Series 1st: Taylor Curry, Commander, Fleet Activities Yokosuka 2nd: Thomas Webster, Visual Information Directorate - NMLPDC 3rd: MC2 Asheka Lawrence, USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) u. I022: Video - Social Media 1st: MC3 Ace Foster, USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) 2nd: MC3 Aaron Lau, Navy Public Affairs Support Element East Det. Southeast 3rd: MC1 Arthurgwain Marquez, Commander, Navy Reserve Forces v. I023: Video - Spot 1st: MC2 Jonathan Clay, Defense Media Activity - Navy Production 2nd: Taylor Curry, Commander, Fleet Activities Yokosuka 3rd: MC3 Noel Heeter, Defense Media Activity Operations Diego Garcia w. I025: Writing - Blog Post 1st: MC1 Jennifer Lebron, Defense Media Activity - Navy Production 2nd: MC3 Dartanon Delagarza, USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) 3rd: Susan Martin, U.S. Navy Recruit Training Command x. I026: Writing - Feature 1st: MC2 Cody Anderson, Commander, Navy Recruiting Command 2nd: Patrick Ciccarone, Commander, Fleet Activities Yokosuka 3rd: MC2 Cameron Edy, USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) y. I027: Writing - Information Story 1st: MC1 Mark Faram, Chief of Naval Personnel 2nd: MC2 Samantha Jetzer, Pacific Missile Range Facility 3rd: MC2 Alex Smedegard, Naval Special Warfare Group ONE z. I028: Writing - Series 1st: MC1 Sean LaMarr, Navy Public Affairs Support Element West Det. Northwest 2nd: Courtney Pollock, Naval Station Rota 3rd: MC2 Dewaylon Wilson, U.S. Recruit Training Command 4. The "Best in Show" Award is given to the top entry from amount the unit/team and individual winner. The 2021 Russell Egnor Navy Media Awards "Best in Show" Navy Media Excellence Award is awarded to Defense Media Activity - Navy Production 5. The recipients of the 2021 Thompson-Ravitz Individual awards are: a. Junior Public Affairs Officer of the Year: LTJG Molly Fresher, Naval Special Warfare Command b. Junior Reserve Public Affairs Officer of the Year: LT Robert Mook, Commander Tenth Fleet c. Civilian Public Affairs Specialist of the Year: Ms. Emiley Murphy, Commander, Fleet Activities Yokosuka d. Unit Public Affairs Representative of the Year: LTJG Drew Hendrick USS Whidbey Island (LSD 41) 6. The recipients of 2021 Thompson-Ravitz Unit Awards are: a. COVID Communication, Shore Large: Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, "Vaccination Rollout Strategy" Honorable Mention: Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division, "Addressing the COVID-129 Pandemic" b. COVID Communication, Afloat Large: USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76), "76 Reasons to Get the Shot" Honorable Mention: Naval Special Warfare Group One, "Leaders Guide to Talking About the Vaccine" c. Communication Innovation, Naval Air Facility El Centro, "Festival of Flight 'On Air' Show" d. Community Outreach, Shore Large: Naval Surface Training Command, "Hometown Heroes Program" e. Special Events and Projects, Shore Large: Chief of Naval Operations, "International Sea Power Symposium" Honorable Mention: United States Naval Academy, "Fox NFL Sunday" f. Special Events and Projects, Shore Small: No Winner Selected g. Special Events and Projects, Afloat Large: USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72), "First Female Carrier CO Change of Command" h. Special Events and Projects, Afloat Small: Explosive Ordnance Groups One and Two, "Navy EOD 80th Anniversary" i. Internal Communication, Shore Large: Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, "One Navy Medicine" j. Public Information, Shore Large: Navy Personnel Command/Chief of Naval Personnel, "MyNavyHR Career Development Symposium" k. Crisis Communication and Emergent Issues, Shore Large: Chief of Naval Personnel, "Task Force One Navy" 7. The "Best in Show" Award is given to the top entry from among the unit winners. The 2021 Thompson-Ravitz "Best in Show" is awarded to USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76), "76 Reasons to Get the Shot" 8. The Thompson-Ravitz Awards for Excellence in Navy Public Affairs (PA) recognize the most exceptional performances by individuals and units in PA throughout the Navy. The awards bear the names of Rear Admiral William Thompson, the first designated Public Affairs Officer (PAO) selected for flag rank and the first PAO to be the Chief of Information (CHINFO), and Rear Admiral Robert Ravitz, a former director of the Naval Reserve PA program and Special Assistant to the CHINFO. 9. The Russell Egnor Navy Media Awards recognize U.S. Navy Active Duty, Reserve and Civilian communication professionals assigned to Navy units for Excellence in writing, photography, graphic arts, and audio and video products. The awards are named for Senior Chief Journalist Russell Egnor, who served more than 34 years of active and Reserve naval service, as well as more than three decades of civilian service at several commands in the National Capital Region. 10. Letters/plaques/awards for the winners are forthcoming. 11. Congratulations to all commands and individuals who participated in these awards programs. Your hard work and superb efforts have made your public affairs programs outstanding examples to emulate. Press Forward! 12. Released by RDML C. W. Brown, Chief of Information.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Navy wants to buy one last San Antonio-class amphibious ship and then end the production line, the service announced in its fiscal 2023 budget request. The LPD-17 class got off to a rough start in its construction, but transformed into a model acquisition program and a workhorse of the fleet. These ships, built at Ingalls Shipbuilding in Mississippi, haul Marines and their gear as part of amphibious ready group/Marine expeditionary unit (ARG/MEU) formations.

QUANTICO, Va. - The U.S. Naval Community College extended the deadline for applications to the associate of arts in Military Studies and the associate of science in Nuclear Engineering Technology programs to Apr. 17, 2022. This gives more opportunity for active duty enlisted Sailors, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen and Coast Guard Reservists to apply to one of these two degree programs. “We want to ensure the maximum opportunity for application into these programs while still having the time to review applicants for eligibility into the program, receiving command approval, and enrolling into the partner institution,” said USNCC’s director of enrollment Alphonso Garrett. “Through ongoing discussions with our partner institutions, we have developed a process to shorten that timeline to enrollment, which means there is more opportunity for Sailors, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen to apply for one of these two programs.” Those that applied to either degree program by the original deadline of Mar. 27, 2022, will have their applications reviewed and a decision made by Apr. 17. Those that apply between Mar. 27 and Apr. 17 will have their applications reviewed and a decision made in May. “We anticipate that some applicants may not be able to commit to enrolling in June due to operational tempo and life commitments,” said Garrett. “We still want to provide the opportunity to service members that may be ready to start their journey of lifelong learning.” This means that the decision-making process would be a rolling process until all of the available seats are filled with eligible and approved candidates. “The last thing we want is to have an opportunity for a deserving service member seeking a naval relevant education to go unfulfilled,” said Sgt. Maj. Mike Hensley, USNCC’s command senior enlisted leader. “These educational opportunities support the warfighting capability and operational readiness our naval forces need to maintain a competitive edge over our potential adversaries.” Active duty enlisted Sailors, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen and Coast Guard Reservists can fill out an application for the Military Studies and Nuclear Engineering Technology associate degree programs on the USNCC website, www.usncc.edu. The first courses will start in June 2022. The United States Naval Community College is the official community college for the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard. To get more information about the USNCC, go to www.usncc.edu. Click on the student interest form link to learn how to be a part of the USNCC Pilot II program.

The Navy can now reassign 36 members of the Special Warfare community who are unvaccinated against COVID-19, the Supreme Court ruled Friday. The Supreme Court granted a partial stay of a preliminary injunction that prevented the Navy from dismissing or reassigning the SEALs and the other members of the Special Warfare community involved in the lawsuit. The Navy still cannot separate the SEALs, but it can assign them to non-deployable positions, which is what the sea service has done for other sailors who have exemptions for the vaccine.

eNavFit is optimized to be used with the following web browsers: Chrome Edge Mozilla Firefox Safari Users attempting to access eNavFit through Internet Explorer should use the above browsers as an alternative.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday granted a request by President Joe Biden's administration to let the Navy decline to deploy SEALs and other special operations forces personnel who refused mandatory COVID-19 vaccination due to religious objections.

On March 1, the US Navy said its newest carrier, USS Gerald R. Ford, had completed its first planned incremental availability, a six-month modernization and maintenance process intended to give the carrier its final touches before its first deployment. Ford entered its PIA after completing full-ship shock trials last summer. Those trials involved detonating three 40,000-pound explosives in the water around Ford. They marked the first such tests the Navy has conducted on a carrier since 1987.

The Navy is clear to decommission five Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruisers following the passage of the Fiscal Year 2022 defense appropriations bill, USNI News understands. The overdue spending bill follows the FY 2022 defense policy bill and allows the Navy to decommission five of the seven cruisers originally requested as part of the White House’s budget request.

By gosh I think you're right but I'm just the messenger. The one's I posted on 3/22/22 are from MYNavyHR as well. There are usually 2 versions floating around where one includes the opportunity (opp) %. The copy you have has a date of 3/4/22 on it. When did you get it? There could have been an update since then. Thanks for pointing that out. I like to see the "behind the scenes" happenings.

Next week, SBE results for Cycle 254 (Active Duty and Full-Time Support) will be released. Check out the details below. March 30 2022 1100 EDT TRIAD March 31 2022 1100 EDT Public Release and profile sheet

TAR and SELRES E-8 and E-9 Quotas for Cycle 253: SELRES E-8 quotas SELRES E-9 quotas TAR (FTS) E-8 and E-9

The Navy separated 75 sailors last week, bringing the total number of separations over refusal to get vaccinated against COVID-19 to 544. Of the separations, 519 were active-duty sailors who have served more than 180 days, 22 were sailors in their first 180 days and three are reservists, according to the Navy’s weekly COVID-19 update, which publishes Wednesdays. Of the branches, the Navy has the second-most separations behind the Marine Corps. As of March 16, 1,174 Marines were separated due to refusal to get vaccinated against COVID-19, an increase of 136 since March 9.

ALNAVRESFOR 09/22 was released on February 22, 2022 and aims to support and retain the Reserve warfighter. The message grants current SELRES NAVET Sailors the opportunity to apply for reversion to their prior-service rating. In other words, Sailors who dropped out of compliance for their rating conversion may be able to revert to their prior rating. The intent behind this policy is to allow motivated Sailors to continue service in the Navy Reserve despite their inability to attend training or complete their aforementioned rating requirements. CNR needs our Reserve Sailors deployable and ready to fight. Reverting them into a rating that they have experience and proficiency with is an opportunity to retain talented deployable assets! For our Navy Reserve Activities, Readiness Units, and Operational Units, take the time with your CCCs to determine how many Sailors are past 18 months in their conversion program who have not completed rate conversion requirements or who have yet to pass the exam. If applicable, and interested, work with them revert to a rate where they can contribute to warfighting readiness and compete for advancement. This recent opportunity will not be available in perpetuity but does offer a reprieve from the challenges of the last 24 months that may have impacted our Sailors’ ability to be ready on day one. Background In April of 2021, Commander, Navy Reserve Force, Vice Admiral Mustin, established guidance prioritizing mobilization readiness as a basis for Warfighting Readiness. COMNAVRESFORNOTE 3060 provides a supplemental policy that consolidated the common showstoppers for mobilization, particularly during a mass (distributed) activation scenario. It charged Reserve Unit leadership with tracking and reporting short notice mobilization requirements such as current Service members’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI), family care plan, uniforms, and more. Many Sailors have tackled the requirements specified in COMNAVRESFORNOTE 3060 but are still not ready to mobilize. These are the Sailors who agreed to a rating conversion as part of their affiliation into the Reserves but have yet to make their new rate “permanent”. Enlisted Sailors affiliate with the Navy Reserve in one of three categories – fully trained, not previously trained, and partially trained. Fully trained Sailors are those who transition seamlessly into the drilling Reserve from active component to Selected Reserve (AC2SELRES), or are recruited in-rate with only a slight break in participation in the Navy. These Sailors arrive seamlessly on day one with the in-rate knowledge required to fight. Not previously trained Sailors enter the Navy through Recruit Training Command – “boot camp” - as New Accession Trainees (NAT). Their first several months in the Navy are spent in an initial active-duty training pipeline (i.e. boot camp, ‘A’ school, block learning, etc.) before reporting to their primary drill site for gain into the Selected Reserve (SELRES). These Sailors arrive with the training and in-rate knowledge to fight as an immediate asset to their mobilization unit. Partially trained Sailors are Navy Veterans (NAVET) and Other Service Veterans (OSVET) who wish to serve in a new capacity. Sailors who affiliate under the Prior Service Re-enlistment Eligibility – Reserve (PRISE-R) program, or who are approved for an AC2SELRES rating conversion, are considered partially trained. In January of this year, there were 801 partially trained Sailors in the Navy Reserve. These Sailors know the military, and are certainly enthusiastic warfighters, but lack the apprentice or journeyman level of expertise of their new rate. As part of their affiliation, these members sign an agreement to meet specific requirements for their new rating to become “permanent.” This may consist of block learning via ‘A’ or ‘C’ schools, but at a minimum, requires passing the Navy-wide Advancement Exam (NWAE). As an aside, most information warfare communities (IWC) also require an interim Top-Secret clearance in order to attend required training. Specific requirements for conversion to a new rating must be met within 18 months of gain to the SELRES. Partially trained Sailors are not considered deployable until these requirements are met and subsequently cannot mobilize. Additionally, E4-E6 Sailors under a conversion program cannot compete for advancement until they have made their rating permanent. Many partially trained Sailors fall out of program compliance by not meeting the deadline to make their rate permanent. Though extensions are possible through a waiver, they are not ideal for supporting warfighting readiness. Priority one on day one is warfighting readiness. COVID-19, travel restrictions, delays in application for clearance investigations, and training backlogs have all created challenges for Sailors to complete rate conversion requirements. Warfighting readiness starts with in-rate knowledge, and much like the items listed in COMNAVRESFORNOTE 3060, in-rate knowledge is in fact a showstopper to mobilize. We know CNR’s fighting instructions. We have our mobilization requirements. Successful conversion to a new rate supports both. If you are a partially trained Sailor, work with your CCC and your chain of command immediately to chart a path forward to mobilization readiness.

UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 211241Z MAR 22 MID200001591469U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 076/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/DNS/MAR// SUBJ/ANNOUNCEMENT OF APPROVAL OF HUMANITARIAN SERVICE MEDAL (HSM) FOR JOINT TASK FORCE HAITI EARTHQUAKE RELIEF OPERATION// REF/A/DOC/JOINT STAFF/01DEC2021// REF/B/DOC/DOD/20JUN19// REF/C/DOC/SECNAV/16AUG2019// NARR/ REF A ANNOUNCES APPROVAL OF THE HSM FOR JOINT TASK FORCE HAITI EARTHQUAKE RELIEF OPERATIONS. REF B IS DOD 1348.33M VOL2, SECDEF MANUAL OF MILITARY DECORATIONS AND AWARDS. REF C IS SECNAV M-1650.1, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS AWARDS MANUAL.// RMKS/1. As required by reference (a), the following guidance is provided for award of the HSM. 2. HSM Eligibility Criteria: a. The HSM has been approved by the award authority for U.S. Service members, Coast Guardsmen, and Reserve Components (to include the National Guard), who were physically present in the Joint Task Force Haiti Joint Operations Area (Haiti and 12 nautical miles per the national maritime boundary) and provided direct humanitarian assistance during the period 15 August 2021 to 5 September 2021. b. The recipient must meet ALL of the following criteria to be eligible for the HSM: (1) Have been physically present, and (2) Directly participated in the humanitarian assistance and disaster relief support provided to the people of Haiti. 3. Awarding authority: a. Active/Reserve personnel. In accordance with reference (b), determination for personnel is delegated to the command level of O-6/civilian equivalent or above. Awarding authorities must confirm individual participation by verifying assignment via orders, evaluations/fitness reports, or other official documentation which verifies participation in the humanitarian relief support provided to the people of Haiti. Once verified, commands should submit the appropriate service record documentation via their personnel office. b. Navy veterans. Navy personnel honorably discharged or retired before announced approval of these awards and who meet the criterion above may submit a written request for consideration for award of the HSM. Written request must indicate the qualifying unit and dates assigned, a copy of the Service Members unredacted DD-214, and any supporting documentation (evaluation, fitness report, TAD or PCS orders) showing serving with the qualifying unit or individual participation. Requests may be mailed to: Navy Personnel Command (PERS 312), 5720 Integrity Drive, Millington, TN 38055. c. Only one award of the HSM may be received for participation in the relief operation. 4. Participating Units and Personnel: a. As required by reference (c), Commanding Officers whose units meet the criteria for award of the HSM must submit a completed OPNAV Form 1650/14 which should include a list of qualified personnel via cno_awards@us.navy.mil. These units will be entered into the awards database. This is to facilitate documentation only and does not imply unit-wide approval. Individual service record documentation continues to be a command responsibility. b. Navy personnel attached to DoD, Joint or other non-Navy commands who meet the criteria outlined above should have their DoD or Joint command confirm eligibility and submit the appropriate service record documentation. 5. Released by Andrew S. Haeuptle, Director, Navy Staff.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 182134Z MAR 22 MID200001587848U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 075/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/MAR// SUBJ/GUIDANCE FOR CY-22 FULL SPEED AHEAD 3.0 TRAINING// REF/A/DOC/TF1N FINAL REPORT// AMPN/REF A IS TASK FORCE ONE NAVY FINAL REPORT// RMKS/1. This NAVADMIN provides guidance for Full Speed Ahead (FSA) 3.0 training and outlines the recommendations for completion and documentation. 2. Background. FSA 3.0 training builds on the previous courses in the FSA series with continued emphasis on character, competence, leadership, personal and organizational growth. It operationalizes the Culture of Excellence (COE) emphasizing the themes of toughness, trust and connectedness. As with its predecessors, FSA 3.0 training blends scenario-based videos with small group discussions led by command facilitators (CF) or other selected command personnel. 3. Purpose. The Navy has teams with great culture and great performance, but we also see examples of teams with poor culture and weak performance. The gap between our best and our worst performers is too great. To remain the worlds strongest Navy, we must consistently have strong performance. Reference (a) identified the need to have *open, honest and necessary conversations across our Navy* and that *these conversations are vital for our Navy team, as understanding and connection builds teamwork and teamwork builds trust.* FSA 3.0 training enables honest, humble and transparent discussion about current performance and challenges each of us to support others. FSA 3.0 training is designed to apply Navy problem- solving tools and best practices to create opportunities for our teams to progress. The training encourages critical thinking, compels respectful and collaborative discussion, inspires adherence to the Navy Core Values and champions a more complete integration of the core attributes and signature behaviors of the Navy. 4. Training Approach. FSA 3.0 training is discretionary training. While there is no Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV) mandate to conduct FSA 3.0 training, there is a strong anecdotal evidence that the training is both needed and wanted in the Fleet. As such, subordinate commands have the discretion to mandate FSA 3.0 training within their organizations. FSA 3.0 training consists of four (4), 60 to 90 minute modules. Each module is accompanied by facilitation guides for all hands audiences, or rank-specific audiences (Junior Sailors [E-1 through E-4], critical middle Sailors [E-5 through E-8, O-1 through O-4] and senior Sailors [E-9, O-5 and above]). Each module addresses themes and behaviors that are foundational to the Navy’s COE. Each module includes a realistic dramatized video vignette, a documentary video interview segment and facilitated discussion. Each of the four modules can be delivered as stand-alone training, but are most effective in succession as each module builds upon previous modules. Commands are encouraged to allow time between modules to allow for processing and reflection. The four FSA 3.0 training modules are: Module 1: Sailor Identity and Connectedness, Module 2: Trust and Fairness, Module 3: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and Module 4: Sailor Today, Sailor Tomorrow. 5. CF Selection and Training. Although formal certification is not required to deliver FSA 3.0 training, due to the nuanced nature of the discussion FSA 3.0 training elicits, commands are highly encouraged to use previously certified CF to deliver the training, or to send new CF to the FSA 3.0 Train- the-Trainer (TTT) course. There are no specified paygrade requirements for CF, however, all should be exemplary and dynamic command members who have the ability to actively engage Sailors while delivering the FSA 3.0 TTT course materials. Previously certified CF include those personnel who were certified for Bystander Intervention to the Fleet (BI2F-FY15), Chart the Course (CTC-FY16), FSA (FY17) or FSA 2.0 (FY18). Commands may run a report of their qualified CF using the NAVADMIN completions report for the course title NETC-FSA 2.0-CF- CERT in the Fleet Training Management Planning System (FLTMPS). This completion report will reflect all CF certified in fiscal year (FY) 2015, FY16 and FY17 under the prior courses CPPD-BI2F-CF-CERT, NETC-CTC-CF-CERT or NETC-FSA-CF-CERT. a. FSA 3.0 TTT Course. The 21st Century Sailor Office (OPNAV N17) staff will conduct CF training in each of the Navy regions throughout the remainder of FY22. The FSA 3.0 TTT course is designed as initial training for newly designated CF, refresher training for previously certified CF and TTT for the Regional Training Force discussed in subparagraph (b). A morning and afternoon session of the FSA 3.0 TTT course will be offered each day of training. Each session is limited to 30 participants. The FSA 3.0 TTT course is approximately 3 hours long. The FSA 3.0 TTT course schedule is: Naval Region Mid-AtlanticNorfolk, VA29-31 MAR Navy Region EURAFRCENTBahrain11-13 APR Navy Region SouthwestSan Diego, CA19-21 APR Navy Region NorthwestBremerton, WA26-28 APR Navy Region HawaiiPearl Harbor, HI10-12 MAY Navy Region SoutheastJacksonville, FL17-19 MAY Navy Region EURAFRCENTNaples24-26 MAY Navy Region JapanYokosuka, Japan15-17 JUN Navy Region KoreaKorea 21 JUN Navy Region MarianasNimitz Hill, Guam23-24 JUN Navy Region Mid-Atlantic Groton, CT28-30 JUN Navy District Washington Washington, DC12-14 JUL FSA 3.0 TTT course completion will be documented by OPNAV N17 facilitators in FLTMPS within 1-2 weeks of course completion, as *Full Speed Ahead (FSA) 3.0 Command Facilitator Certification (FSA-3.0-CF- CERT).* b. Regional Training Force. FSA 3.0 training is an enduring training and discussion platform. While many commands will execute the training straightaway, others may wait for a pause in operations tempo to execute. Accordingly, OPNAV N17 instructors will train a regional training force, leveraging echelon II-IV subject matter experts. Once trained, the regional training force will be empowered to conduct CF training for echelon V commands in their region. Navy regions should work with base commanders to identify individuals for the Regional Training Force leveraging command climate specialists, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Practitioners, Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Officers, Religious Ministry Teams and other COE/command resilience team members. c. Additionally, on the afternoon of the first training day in each region, OPNAV N17 will host an O6 or GS15-led informational session for command triads and other interested leadership to discuss COE-related topics and initiatives. d. Region Point of Contact (POC). Regional commanders shall identify and appoint a local POC to assist OPNAV N17 personnel with registration and logistical coordination to include reserving suitable classroom space and ensuring audio and video capabilities. Once appointed, the POC should work with base commanders in order to ensure widest dissemination to tenant commands to include amplifying registration and logistical information. 6. Training Delivery. CF will deliver FSA 3.0 training as small group, face-to-face discussions. FSA 3.0 training sessions should normally include no more than 30 personnel in order to maximize the advantage of the small group experience. Peer-led sessions are encouraged using the different facilitation guides delineated by rank. a. Training Audience. FSA 3.0 training is strongly recommended for all uniformed Navy personnel and civilians or other service personnel assigned at Navy commands are encouraged to attend consistent with their mission requirements and command direction. b. Training Materials. FSA 3.0 training materials (videos, Facilitator Guide and supporting material), the FSA 3.0 TTT course schedule, regional points of contact and additional resources are available for download at the COE FSA website at (https://www.mynavyhr.navy.mil/Support-Services/21st-Century-Sailor/Culture- of-Excellence/Full-Speed-Ahead/). 7. Documentation. For commands documenting completion of FSA 3.0 training using FLTMPS, learning event completion form each module has a unique course identification number: Full Speed Ahead (FSA) 3.0 Peer Level Training Module 1 (FSA-3.0-M1), Full Speed Ahead (FSA) 3.0 Peer Level Training Module 2 (FSA- 3.0-M2), Full Speed Ahead (FSA) 3.0 Peer Level Training Module 3 (FSA-3.0-M3) and Full Speed Ahead (FSA) 3.0 Peer Level Training Module 4 (FSA-3.0-M4). 8. Assessment. This should not be viewed as *one and done* training. Behavior change takes practice. All commands are encouraged to take ownership of this training by assessing the knowledge and understanding of the topics discussed by Sailors and by making this training a part of day-to- day conversations. The measure of success of this training will be the extent to which Sailors remain engaged up and down the chain of command and continue the conversation among their peers about making good decisions, modeling signature behaviors and treating everyone with dignity and respect. 9. POC are CDR Tracy Less, who can be reached via e-mail at theresa.c.less(at)us.navy.mil and CM1 Bill Root, who can be reached via e-mail at william.e.root23(at)us.navy.mil. 10. Released by Vice Admiral John B. Nowell Jr, N1.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 181753Z MAR 22 MID200001587369U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 074/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/DNS/MAR// SUBJ/ANNOUNCEMENT OF APPROVAL OF HUMANITARIAN SERVICE MEDAL (HSM) FOR OPERATION ALLIES REFUGE (OAR)// REF/A/DOC/JOINT STAFF/11FEB2022// REF/B/DOC/DOD/20JUN19// REF/C/DOC/SECNAV/16AUG2019// NARR/ REF A ANNOUNCES APPROVAL OF THE HSM FOR OPERATION ALLIES REFUGE (OAR). REF B IS DOD 1348.33M VOL2, SECDEF MANUAL OF MILITARY DECORATIONS AND AWARDS. REF C IS SECNAV M-1650.1, NAVY AND MARINE AWARDS MANUAL.// RMKS/1. As required by reference (a), the following guidance is provided for award of the HSM. 2. HSM Eligibility Criteria: a. The HSM has been approved by the award authority for U.S. Service members and Reserve Components (to include the National Guard), who were physically present and provided direct humanitarian assistance to the evacuees during the transportation to and initial settlement at the following intermediate, safe haven locations: Qatar - Al Udeid Air Base, Camp as Sayliyah, and Camp Doha; Kuwait - Camp Buehring and Ali Al Salem Air Base; Shaikh Isa Air Base, Bahrain; United Arab Emirates - Abu Dhabi and Al Dahfra; Prince Sultan Air Base, Saudi Arabia; Camp Bondsteel, Kosovo; Germany - Rhine Ordnance Barracks and Ramstein; Rota, Spain; Sigonella, Italy; Virginia- Chantilly, Dulles, Quantico, Fort Pickett, and Fort Lee; Fort Bliss, Texas; Fort McCoy, Wisconsin; Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey; Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, and Tampa, Florida during the period 01 July 2021 through 30 August 2021. b. The recipient must meet ALL of the following criteria to be eligible for the HSM: (1) Have been physically present, and (2) Directly participated in the humanitarian relief support to the refugees who were evacuated following cessation of combat actions in Afghanistan. (3) Personnel who were not directly participating in the humanitarian efforts to the evacuees remain eligible for personal military decorations for support rendered to the overall success of the operation. (4) All supporting personnel inside the Afghanistan theater for OAR remain eligible for the Afghanistan Campaign Medal. 3. Awarding authority: a. Active/Reserve personnel. Determination for personnel is delegated to the command level of O-6/civilian equivalent or above. Awarding authorities must confirm individual participation by verifying assignment via orders, evaluations/fitness reports, or other official documentation which verifies participation in the humanitarian relief support to the refugees who were evacuated following cessation of combat actions in Afghanistan. Once verified, commands should submit the appropriate service record documentation via their personnel office. b. Navy veterans. Navy personnel honorably discharged or retired before announced approval of these awards and who meet the criterion above may submit a written request for consideration for award of the HSM. Written request must indicate the qualifying unit and dates assigned, a copy of the Service Members unredacted DD-214, and any supporting documentation (evaluation, fitness report, TAD or PCS orders) showing serving with the qualifying unit or individual participation. Requests may be mailed to: Navy Personnel Command (PERS 312), 5720 Integrity Drive, Millington, TN 38055. c. Only one award of the HSM may be received for participation in the OAR relief operation. 4. Participating Units and Personnel: a. As required by reference (c), Commanding Officers whose units meet the criteria for award of the HSM must submit a completed OPNAV Form 1650/14 which should include a list of qualified personnel via cno_awards@us.navy.mil. These units will be entered into the awards database. This is to facilitate documentation only and does not imply unit-wide approval. Individual service record documentation continues to be a command responsibility. b. Navy personnel attached to DoD, Joint or other non-Navy commands who meet the criteria outlined above should have their DoD or Joint command confirm eligibility and submit the appropriate service record documentation. 5. Released by Andrew S. Haeuptle, Director, Navy Staff// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 181358Z MAR 22 MID200001586627U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 072/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/MAR// SUBJ/FY-23 NAVY ACTIVE AND RESERVE COMPONENT ENLISTED ADVANCEMENT SELECTION BOARDS FOR CHIEF PETTY OFFICER// REF/A/DOC/BUPERS/19SEP18// REF/B/MSG/CNO WASHINGTON DC/102127ZDEC20// REF/C/DOC/COMNAVPERSCOM/14JUN18// REF/D/MSG/CNO WASHINGTON DC/271415ZSEP19// NARR/REF A IS BUPERSINST 1430.16G, ADVANCEMENT MANUAL FOR ENLISTED PERSONNEL OF THE U.S. NAVY AND U.S. NAVY RESERVE. REF B IS NAVADMIN 320/20, IMPLEMENTATION OF NAVY ENLISTED CLASSIFICATION CODE N33Z IDENTIFYING NUCLEAR ENGINEERING WATCH SUPERVISOR AND PROPULSION PLANT WATCH SUPERVISOR QUALIFICATIONS. REF C IS MILPERSMAN 1220-040, SUBMARINE QUALIFICATIONS DESIGNATION FOR ENLISTED MEMBERS. REF D IS NAVADMIN 220/19, ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF LETTERS TO PROMOTION AND SELECTION BOARDS THROUGH MYNAVY PORTAL.// RMKS/1. This NAVADMIN provides guidance for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Navy Active and Reserve Component Enlisted Advancement Selection Boards for Chief Petty Officer. The Active Component and Training and Administration of the Reserves (TAR) cycle is 254 and the Selected Reserve (SELRES) cycle is 110. For board purposes, the Reserve Component (RC) board will consider TAR (cycle 254), SELRES and those serving on voluntary and involuntary recall and mobilization orders (cycle 110). Mobilized individual ready reserve and canvasser recruiter personnel are considered under the SELRES requirements for advancement. This is a change from policy in reference (a). 2. RC Timeline a. 28 February 2022: Individual augmentation evaluations used for time-in-rate (TIR) waivers must have an ending date by this date and must be available to the board. b. 6 May 2022: RC candidates changing ratings must be in their new rating by this date to be considered for selection in the new rating. c. 23 May 2022: Letter to the board (LTB) deadline for the RC E-7 selection board. d. 6 June 2022: RC E-7 selection board convenes. All eligibility requirements, to include any waivers, must have final approval and be posted to the records of the candidates prior to this date. e. 24 June 2022: RC E-7 selection board scheduled to adjourn. 3. AC Timeline a. 28 February 2022: Individual augmentation evaluations used for TIR waivers must have an ending date by this date and must be available to the board. b. 5 June 2022: AC candidates changing ratings must be in their new rating by this date to be considered for selection in the new rating. c. 20 June 2022: LTB deadline to the AC E-7 selection board. d. 5 July 2022: AC E-7 selection board convenes. All eligibility requirements, to include any waivers, must have final approval and be posted to the records of the candidates prior to this date. e. 29 July 2022: AC E-7 selection board scheduled to adjourn. 4. Eligibility Criteria. Candidates must meet the eligibility requirements outlined in chapters 2 and 11 of reference (a) and this NAVADMIN prior to the scheduled board convening date. All requirements must be reflected in the enlisted master file (EMF) for AC and TAR or inactive manpower and personnel management information system for SELRES, those serving on voluntary and involuntary recall and mobilization orders, mobilized individual ready reserve and canvasser recruiter personnel prior to the board convening. Requirements achieved or posted to the record of the candidates after the scheduled board convening date will be considered late and will not make a candidate eligible for the regularly scheduled board or entitle a candidate to a special selection board. If candidates are deemed ineligible for advancement and invalidated in Navy enlisted advancement system (NEAS) but later regain eligibility, submit a message-formatted e-mail to Naval Education and Training Professional Development Center (NETPDC) (N321) and Selection Board Eligibility Branch (PERS-802) requesting validation of eligibility status and provide an explanation. Eligibility requirements include: a. The name of the candidate appearing on the selection board eligibility list in the correct competitive group on their profile sheet. Candidates should register for e-mail notification for profile sheet updates via MyNavy Portal (MNP) https://www.mnp.navy.mil/group/advancement-and-promotion/my-advancement. Select *My Profiles* then *Advancement Profile Sheet- Individuals.* Candidates and commands share equal responsibility to ensure the eligibility list is accurate. Because eligibility status can change without direct notification, candidates should verify their profile sheet on a continuous basis. Commands must verify their examination status verification reports (ESVR) weekly through the projected board adjourn date at the NEAS website via MNP https://www.mnp.navy.mil/group/advancement-and-promotion/command-information. Select *Command Advancement Tools* then *Advancement Profile Sheet-ESO.* b. TIR date must be on or before 1 January 2020. In line with reference (a), the terminal eligibility date used to compute TIR is 1 January 2023. If an early promote (EP) TIR waiver is granted, the evaluation used to grant the EP TIR waiver must be available to the board. c. High year tenure (HYT) waivers must be approved prior to the board convening. In order to be eligible for board consideration, an eligible candidate must have a HYT date in current paygrade of 1 September 2022 or later. Candidates who reach HYT before 1 September 2022 for the next higher paygrade are ineligible for advancement, regardless of any approved HYT waiver. Service Members with an approved HYT date in September 2022 may apply for an additional waiver of their current HYT gate due to the current board results scheduling and terminal leave constraints. HYT waivers will be considered for up to an additional 2 months after 1 September 2022. Requests will be approved on a case-by-case basis. Sailors will submit a command endorsed Navy Personnel 1306/7 enlisted personnel action request (NAVPERS 1306/7) to My Navy Career Center (MNCC) via MyNavy Portal or by emailing the ePAR request directly to askmncc(at)navy.mil. Requests must be approved by 1 June 2022. d. Sailors with a previously approved retirement are automatically removed from board consideration (invalidated), unless the command completes a revalidation of the Sailors retirement prior to selection board convening date by sending an e-mail with a reason for revalidation to PERS-802 to ensure they are considered by the board. See paragraph 208 of reference (a) for fleet reserve request impacts to eligibility. e. Security clearance requirements. See paragraph 203 of reference (a). Ratings requiring a security clearance are AC, AE, AG, AO, AT, AWF, AWO, AWR, AWS, AWV, AZ, CTI, CTM, CTN, CTR, CTT, EOD, ET, FC, FCA, GM, HT, IC, IS, IT, LN, MA, MC, MN, ND, OS, QM, SB, SO, STG and YN, as well as all nuclear and submarine ratings. f. Rating specific and competitive group eligibility requirements. Candidates must meet special requirements for certain ratings, as outlined in paragraphs 203 and 206 of reference (a). Required Navy enlisted classifications (NEC) must be posted in the enlisted master file (EMF) for AC and TAR or inactive manpower and personnel management information system (IMAPMIS) for SELRES, those serving on voluntary and involuntary recall and mobilization orders, mobilized individual ready reserve and canvasser recruiter personnel prior to the regularly scheduled board convening date. NECs posted to the EMF or IMAPMIS after the regularly scheduled board convening date, even with a prior date, will not entitle a candidate to a special selection board. Commands must verify and submit a message-formatted e-mail to NETPDC (N321) and PERS-802 requesting invalidation of those selection board eligible candidates who no longer meet rate specific and competitive group qualifications listed in reference (a) or below by the scheduled board convening date. (1) Nuclear trained Sailors must hold additional NEC N33Z to indicate engineering watch supervisor or propulsion plant watch supervisor qualification in line with reference (b). (2) In line with reference (c), non-nuclear trained submarine Sailors must be designated as either qualified in submarines (SS), in training for submarine qualifications (SU), or qualified for submarines but not planned for future assignment to submarine duty (SQ) as of the board convening date to be eligible. Candidates designated as qualified for submarines but not in a submarine source rating or NEC or previously assigned in submarines but disqualified for submarine duty and serving in a submarine support billet (SP) are not eligible for advancement. 5. Record review and communication with the E-7 selection board refer to reference (d). a. Communication to the board must originate from the individual candidate and must be accompanied under the signed LTB of the candidate. b. All LTBs and each enclosure must contain the candidates full name and 10-digit DoD identification number. Candidates must verify the correct board number is on their signed cover letter. Board numbers are: (1) Board # 335 for SELRES. (2) Board # 336 for TAR. (3) Board # 360 for AC. c. Electronic submission of selection board documents (ESSBD) is the preferred method to submit a LTB as directed by reference (d). Candidates may access ESSBD via MNP at https://www.mnp.navy.mil/group/advancement-and-promotion . After login and navigating to the Advancement and Promotion webpage, select the *ESSBD* tile link. d. If unable to submit a LTB package using ESSBD (e.g. low bandwidth, system outage, etc.) candidates should review procedures in reference (d) to submit via alternate methods or candidates may mail a LTB to the addresses below. Mailed LTBs should be on plain white paper and paper clipped (no staples, binders, folders or tabs). (1) SELRES/Mobilized E-7 Board: MyNavy Career Center (BUPERS 074) President, FY-23 Reserve E-7 Selection Board #335 5720 Integrity Drive Millington TN 38055 (2) TAR E-7 Board: MyNavy Career Center (BUPERS 074) President, FY-23 Reserve E-7 Selection Board #336 5720 Integrity Drive Millington TN 38055 (3) Active E-7 Board: MyNavy Career Center (BUPERS 074) President, FY-23 Active E-7 Selection Board #360 5720 Integrity Drive Millington TN 38055 e. Certified or registered mail is not advised due to delays in handling. f. Candidates may submit more than one LTB vice waiting until the deadline to submit one all-inclusive LTB. Although multiple LTBs are authorized, candidates should not duplicate previously sent information. g. The same LTB deadline applies to candidates who gain eligibility after the LTB deadline and before the convening date. A candidate who is working to fix an eligibility issue and expects to be selection board eligible prior to the board convening date may submit a LTB. 6. Selection board results. Official results will be provided online via BUPERS Online to authorized command representatives prior to the release of the official results via NAVADMIN. Selectee profile sheets will be published by NETPDC (N321) within 30 days of both RC and AC selection board results being released via NAVADMIN. Educational services officers who are registered users may access results through the NEAS website via MNP at https://www.mnp.navy.mil/group/advancement-and-promotion/command-information. Select *Command Advancement Tools* then *Advancement Profile Sheet-ESO.* Individual candidates may view profile sheets via MNP at https://www.mnp.navy.mil/group/advancement-and-promotion/my-advancement. Select *My Profiles* then *Advancement Profile Sheet-Individuals.* 7. Additional information regarding this cycle will be posted via MNP. a. AC boards: https://www.mnp.navy.mil/group/advancement-and-promotion/active-duty-enlisted. b. RC boards: https://www.mnp.navy.mil/group/advancement-and-promotion/reserve-enlisted. 8. Points of Contact a. MyNavy Career Center, (833) 330-6622 or via e-mail at askmncc(at)navy.mil. Do not submit LTBs to this e-mail. b. PERS-802, (901) 874-4537/DSN 882 e-mail at NPC_enlisted_selbd_elig(at)navy.mil. Do not submit LTBs to this e-mail. c. NETPDC (N321), (850) 473-6148/DSN 753 or via e-mail at sfly_N321_discrepanc(at)navy.mil. 9. This message will remain in effect until canceled or superseded. 10. Released by Vice Admiral John B. Nowell, Jr, N1.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 171616Z MAR 22 MID600051619294U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 069/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/MAR// SUBJ/FY-23 ACTIVE DUTY NAVY NUCLEAR LIMITED DUTY OFFICER IN SERVICE PROCUREMENT SELECTION BOARD RESULTS// REF/A/DOC/MANMED/22FEB18// AMPN/REF A IS NAVMED P 117, MANUAL OF MEDICAL DEPARTMENT.// RMKS/1. Congratulations to selectees of the FY-23 Active Duty Navy Nuclear Limited Duty Officer (LDO) In-Service Procurement Board. 2. For LDO selectees, read name, commissioning month/year. All appointments are effective on the first day of the commissioning month. Members are directed to verify their select status via BUPERS Online. LIMITED DUTY OFFICER ENSIGN NUCLEAR POWER - 620X Carrillo, Michael A 1022 Isgar Anthony S 1022 Patania Raymond A 1022 Smithburns Nicolas R 1022 Thigpen Tyler J 1022 Whitley William D 1022 Garcia Oliver R 1122 Giordano Christopher J 1122 Hedberg Patrick J 1122 Pellowski Jacob J 1122 Rossman Jonathan D 1122 Sanders David S 1122 Coffman Dillon C 1222 Golden Matthew D 1222 Helms Ryan P 1222 Holiday Joseph W 1222 Young Jonathan D 1222 Zevenbergen Aaron J 1222 Graeber Jacob A 0223 Johnson Andrew M 0223 Lenzi David L 0223 Miller Dustin M 0223 Lewis Cody A 0323 Matosfaro Fernando M 0323 Saydyk Ian G 0323 Alley Nicholas D 0423 Cawthon James C 0423 Humphrey Brent A 0423 Peters Tyler W 0423 Tuohy Kevin J 0523 Roten William B 0523 Portillo Matthew W 0523 Allen Patrick J 0723 Carroll Thomas J 0723 Dennis Mitchell L 0723 Engelhardt Zachary R 0723 Ho Danny 0723 Kelly Michael Cavanaugh 0723 Walz William J 0723 Cates Nicholas L 0823 Christensen Rigil K 0823 Downs Thomas C 0823 Hadyka Lucas B 0823 Perez Chancemichael A 0823 Polk Travis R E 0823 Zamagias Nicholas G 0823 3. Each applicant should take pride in knowing that the superior performance documented in the evaluations reviewed by the board required the members to dedicate long hours in making hard choices to ensure only the best and fully qualified applicants were selected. I am confident that each selectee will justify their selection time and again in their new career as naval officers. Those not selected are highly encouraged to seek out an LDO/CWO in your area for advice on ways to grow professionally and improve opportunity for future selection. Bravo Zulu to all who were willing to answer the call. 4. This message is not authority to issue appointments. Frocking is prohibited. COMNAVPERSCOM (PERS 806) will deliver appointments to MyNavy Career Center (MNCC) Millington approximately 60 days prior to the commissioning date. MNCC will forward appointments to the Transaction Service Center (TSC) Great Lakes, who will distribute directly to the respective CPPAs. TSC Great Lakes will also process the conversion from enlisted to officer status for LDOs, for all commands other than those who have the ability to process their own (CVN, SPECWAR, etc.). TSC Great Lakes can be contacted directly at the below email address. 5. Commanding Officers are directed to: a. Notify selectee. b. Notify PERS 803 via official correspondence not later than 10 days following release of this message of selectees who do not accept appointment. Selectees who decline their commission within this 10 day period will be considered by the FY 23 Enlisted Selection Boards. After the 10 day period, PERS 802 will invalidate all FY 23 Active Duty Navy Nuclear LDO In Service Procurement Selection Board selectees' eligibility for the FY 23 Active Duty Enlisted Selection Boards. c. Per reference (a), ensure LDO selectees obtain a commissioning physical within 90 days preceding the appointment month. Notify the Nuclear LDO detailer (PERS 422B) upon completion. d. Hold execution of all permanent change of station orders in abeyance, if applicable and immediately notify PERS 40 of member's selection. e. Administer official physical fitness assessment (PFA) within 4 months of commissioning date. Selectees must hand carry test results to Officer Indoctrination School, Newport, RI. If selectee fails to achieve satisfactory medium, notify Nuclear LDO detailer (PERS 422B). Hold commissioning in abeyance until successful completion of PFA. f. Hold appointment in abeyance if it is determined that a selectee is no longer mentally, physically, morally or professional qualified or if they fail to meet current PFA requirements. Immediately forward documentation citing reason to PERS 803. 6. If a Nuclear LDO selectee's enlistment (including any extensions) expires after the date of appointment, they are not reenlistment eligible unless appointment is declined. 7. Each selectee should contact their Nuclear LDO officer detailer (PERS-422B) for submission requirements with regard to personal information and history cards, and inform PERS 806 of address changes to facilitate appointment delivery. 8. Points of Contact a. PERS 422B point of contact for Nuclear LDO In service Procurement Board, issues/questions is LT Karl Martin at (901) 874 3938/DSN 882. b. PERS 806 point of contact for issuance of oath and commissioning documents issues/questions is Mr. Lee Eclavea, at (901) 874 4374/DSN 882 or email at officer_appt.fct(at)navy.mil. c. MNCC point of contact for distribution of oath and commissioning documents is askmncc(at)navy.mil. d. TSC Great Lakes point of contact for oath of office distribution and conversion questions is M GRLK TSCEOPP(at)navy.mil. 9. Released by VADM John B. Nowell, Jr, N1.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

Here is FY-24 COMMAND MASTER CHIEF SCREEN BOARD RESULTS UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 171628Z MAR 22 MID600051619347U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 070/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/MAR// SUBJ/FY-23 ACTIVE-DUTY NAVY COMMAND MASTER CHIEF PETTY OFFICER ADVANCEMENT SELECTION BOARD RESULTS// REF/A/DOC/BUPERS/2NOV07// AMPN/REF A IS BUPERSINST 1430.16G, ADVANCEMENT MANUAL FOR ENLISTED PERSONNEL OF THE U.S. NAVY AND U.S. NAVY RESERVE.// GENTEXT/RMKS/1. Congratulations to the following personnel who have been selected for advancement to Command Master Chief Petty Officer by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Active-Duty Navy Command Master Chief Selection Board. Strong competition between qualified professionals is one of the strengths of our Navy and your selection speaks highly of your abilities. 2. This NAVADMIN is not authorization for advancement. Specific dates of advancement will be published by Commanding Officer, Naval Education and Training Professional Development Center Pensacola, FL. Personnel listed below may be frocked in line with reference (a) if qualified. 3. Members are directed to verify their select status via BUPERS Online. The selection list is in alphabetical order by rate within competitive category. Read each line from left to right, name, and numerical order of advancement. CMDCM - Command Master Chief Aleman Ronmel 014 Alvarado Dona 019 Augustin Jace 052 Avallone Mich 105 Byard Christo 028 Chadderton Ja 068 Cruz Benjamin 012 Dortrait Andr 097 Eickhoff Will 017 Ervin Cory Jo 059 Evangelista J 045 Flanders Mich 078 Foote Terranc 040 Harlow Mark D 004 Hernandez Jav 032 Hutto Phillip 073 James Paul 033 Jaramillotumb 029 Jones Jeffrey 018 Kemp John Roy 046 Khorshed Moha 077 Kumley Willia 003 Lee Jacquelin 024 Lewis Robert 016 Mills Isaiah 050 Montes Christ 020 Morales Sarah 061 Murodov Artem 056 Nanny Apryl 053 New Edmond Ch 109 Nurse Jerome 039 Oonyu Suxuan 083 Perry Regita 047 Pittenger Ben 055 Rajaballey Jo 008 Rayner Mark S 082 Richardson Ja 009 Roberts Anton 048 Robinson Rano 038 Rojas Cesar L 054 Settles Stace 002 Spruill Anton 013 Stauffer Davi 051 Strupczewski 044 Suhr Raymond 043 Torres Albert 030 Turiano Gomer 049 Vira Michael 001 Williams Avag 006 Williamsavery 063 Willie Nkomo 062 Wimberly Aaro 057 Wohl Blake Ro 102 Worth Andrew 042 4. Released By Vice Admiral John B. Nowell, Jr, N1.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 171644Z MAR 22 MID600051619420U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 071/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/MAR// SUBJ/FY-23 NAVY RESERVE COMMAND MASTER CHIEF PETTY OFFICER ADVANCEMENT SELECTION BOARD RESULTS// REF/A/DOC/BUPERS/19SEP2018// AMPN/REF A IS BUPERSINST 1430.16G, ADVANCEMENT MANUAL FOR ENLISTED PERSONNEL OF THE U.S. NAVY AND U.S. NAVY RESERVE.// GENTEXT/RMKS/1. Congratulations to the following personnel who have been selected for advancement to command master chief petty officer by the FY-23 Navy Reserve Command Master Chief Selection Board. Strong competition between qualified professionals is one of the strengths of our Navy and your selection speaks highly of your abilities. 2. This NAVADMIN is not authorization for advancement. Specific dates of advancement will be published by Commanding Officer, Naval Education and Training Professional Development Center Pensacola, FL. Personnel listed below may be frocked IAW ref (a) if qualified. 3. Members are directed to verify their select status via BUPERS Online. The selection list is in alphabetical order by rate within competitive category. Read each line from left to right, name, and numerical order of advancement. Categories of advancement are selected reservist and full time support. Selected Reservist CMDCM - Command Master Chief Harvie Michae 001 Full Time Support CMDCM - Command Master Chief Briody John P 002 Franklin Glen 001 Kelly Ervin J 003 Rudisill Troy 004 4. Released By Vice Admiral John B. Nowell Jr, N1.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

(Tribune News Service) — More than two dozen Navy SEALs and other service members, who said the Department of Defense has punished them for refusing the COVID-19 vaccination due to religious reasons, are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold a preliminary injunction issued in January that sided with the military members. "The Navy service members in this case seek to vindicate the very freedoms they have sacrificed so much to protect," wrote U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor, of Fort Worth, who issued the injunction, which has been upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.