Tony

WASHINGTON — House lawmakers on Wednesday raised alarm over the string of suicides on the USS George Washington and the readiness of the Navy overall as the Pentagon’s top official acknowledged shortcomings with how sailors are housed on ships undergoing repairs.

Just in case you haven't seen this page -> AVO WO Procurement Program

Try this email, ldocwoocm.fct@navy.mil, which was found on the LDO/CWO Community Manager page. Might be worth a try.

When the U.S. Navy called for a new light attack aircraft to replace the Douglas A-4 Skyhawk in the early 1960s, the competition that followed was stiff. Top players including Douglas, North American, Vought, and Grumman were all in the running, with Grumman’s pint-sized A-6 Intruder derivative, in particular, being something of a historical aviation oddity.

Service members of all branches now have the option to keep their guns in their in-home storage without cutting into their household goods weight allowance during moves, the Defense Department announced. The Joint Travel Regulations were amended last week to allow empty gun safes up to 500 pounds in combined weight at no personal cost to military members going through a permanent change of station.

Navy separations due to continued refusal of the COVID-19 vaccine rose by nearly 70 sailors over the past week. Approved separations, which do not necessarily mean the sailor has yet left the service, are now at 884, according to the Navy’s weekly COVID-19 update. The Navy has the second highest number of separations, behind the Marine Corps, which has now separated 2,117 Marines, according to the service’s monthly COVID-19 update.

By Mass Communication Specialist (SW/AW/IW) Lawrence Davis, Navy Reserve Region Readiness and Mobilization Command Fort Worth Public Affairs Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth – Navy Reserve Region Readiness and Mobilization Command Fort Worth (REDCOM FW) Commander Capt. Mark Hofmann recently announced his region’s selections for the 2021 Large, Medium, and Small Navy Reserve Centers (NRC) of the Year. NRCs are considered large, medium, or small based upon the number of Reserve Sailors assigned to them. NRCs with up to 200 Reservists assigned to them are categorized as a small NRC. Medium NRCs are those with between 201 and 499 Reserve personnel, and large NRCs are responsible for 500 or more Reserve Sailors. Of REDCOM FW’s 19 NRCs, four are categorized as large, seven as medium, and eight as small. To deliver the news of their selection results, Capt. Hofmann and Command Master Chief Darrin Lowe visited each category’s winning NRC to present trophies and congratulate the commanding officers and their staffs. “There was solid competition in all three categories, but each had a clear winner” said Hofmann. “I would like to congratulate the 2021 REDCOM Fort Worth NRCs of the Year.” NRC St. Louis, Missouri emerged victorious with REDCOM FW’s selection as the region’s “Large NRC of the Year.” NRC Austin, Texas received the award for “Medium NRC of the Year.” And, NRC Springfield, Missouri won as the region’s “Small NRC of the Year.” REDCOM FW’s front office leadership team evaluated multiple categories of annual performance data for each NRC during the selection process. These areas included but were not limited to: operational execution; command climate; command assessment performance scores; funeral honors execution; and contingency response. “None of our NRCs of the Year won simply by earning high grades on a scorecard,” said Hofmann. “Yes, they are all top performers, but the difference is that these commands have achieved top performance through their culture.” “They have a culture of deeply engaged leaders,” Hofmann continued. “They have a culture of tapping into the technical expertise of every member of the team, regardless of paygrade or seniority; everyone pulls hard on the rope. And, they have a culture of welcoming challenge because these Sailors recognize challenge as an opportunity to show the world how well they’ve mastered their craft.” NRC St. Louis Commanding Officer Cmdr. Ryan Carmichael echoed the REDCOM FW commander’s sentiments in his remarks regarding his NRC’s selection for the award. “Excellence is a culture that requires constant effort by all hands,” said Carmichael. “Our selection provides both validation and motivation as we continue our journey towards excellence. Words cannot express how proud I am of our NRC St. Louis team and their accomplishments.” NRC Austin Commanding Officer Cmdr. Jonathan Thompson expressed gratitude for his NRC’s selection and attributed much of his command’s success to his team’s hard work and dedication. “I am absolutely thrilled and honored to have my command recognized this way,” said Thompson. “It’s a testament to my great staff, our triad, and Reserve team. We will display the trophy proudly and continue to strive for higher levels of achievement.” NRC Springfield Commanding Officer Cmdr. Jason Moody spoke about the importance of resisting complacency through a continuous cycle of honest self-assessment. “My team is incredibly talented and diligent in their pursuit of mission excellence,” said Moody. “I am completely humbled and honored that our command was selected as the 2021 Small NRC of the Year. I have always told my staff we are the best because they’ve proven that time and again. The challenge now is to maintain that success. We do that by not resting on our past success. We have to continually ask ourselves ‘how can best be better?’” Assistant Chief of Staff Mr. Christopher Bownds also congratulated each of the three NRCs on their accomplishments and encouraged all of REDCOM FW’s NRCs as they continue to raise the standard of excellence across the region. “You don’t get the NRC of the Year award by winning a sprint,” said Bownds. “You do it by winning a marathon, excelling every day and representing the best of REDCOM FW to the entire Reserve Force.” Navy Reserve Centers ensure Reserve Sailors are administratively, medically and operationally ready to deploy at a moment’s notice. NRC’s provide training, equipment, career management and family resources to help Reserve Sailors and their families meet the challenges and obligations of military service.

Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa published a letter to the Department of Veterans Affairs Friday demanding data to ensure servicemen are not being unfairly stripped of their Second Amendment rights. Grassley wrote the letter to request insight and data on veterans who are reported to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS).

After a stunning live-fire demonstration in the Gulf of Mexico, America’s new “QUICKSINK” bomb, a fast-moving Joint Capability Technology Demonstration, is ready to target China’s vast armada of aggressive civilian and lightly-armed military craft.

Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Adm. Mike Gilday released an update to the CNO Professional Reading Program, May 6.

THE PENTAGON – The mid-life repair and refueling of carrier USS George Washington (CVN-73) will extend into 2023 and last well over five and half years, according to Navy budget documents. The service now estimates the refueling and refurbishment will finish in March of 2023, almost 19 months later than the expected August 2021 initial delivery, the service said in its recently released Fiscal Year 2023 budget material.

THE PENTAGON — Amphibious assault ship USS Tripoli (LHA-7) departed Naval Station San Diego, Calif., on an independent deployment to the Western Pacific on Monday, USNI News has learned. The 45,000-ton big-deck amphibious ship left San Diego to gather F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters that will include further testing of the Marine’s “lightning carrier” concept, a defense official confirmed to USNI News. The lightning carrier can load up to 20 of the short take-off, vertically landing F-35s as an adjunct capability to a carrier strike group, USNI News understands. A U.S. 3rd Fleet spokesman confirmed to USNI News the big-deck left San Diego on Monday, but did not provide additional details on the deployment.

But the U.S. must probe even further to catch up with China’s access to the ocean’s deepest reaches

RTTUZYUW RHOIAAA0023 1171306-UUUU--RHSSSUU. ZNR UUUUU R 271306Z APR 22 FM COMNAVRESFOR NORFOLK VA TO NAVRESFOR CNO WASHINGTON DC COMNAVRESFORCOM NORFOLK VA COMNAVPERSCOM MILLINGTON TN COMNAVAIRFORES SAN DIEGO CA COMNAVIFORES FORT WORTH TX COMNAVRESFOR NORFOLK VA NAVREG MIDLANT RCC NORFOLK VA NAVREG MIDLANT RCC GREAT LAKES IL NAVREG SOUTHEAST RCC JACKSONVILLE FL NAVREG SOUTHEAST RCC FORT WORTH TX NAVREG SOUTHWEST RCC SAN DIEGO CA NAVREG NORTHWEST RCC EVERETT WA BT UNCLAS ALNAVRESFOR 017/22 MSGID/GENADMIN/COMNAVRESFOR NORFOLK VA/N095CC/APR// SUBJ/FISCAL YEAR 2021 RESERVE COMPONENT PERSONNEL PROGRAMS EXCELLENCE AWARD// REF/A/DOC/OPNAV/22FEB12// REF/B/DOC/COMNAVRESFOR NORFOLK VA/05NOV20// NARR/REF A IS OPNAVINST 1040.11D, NAVY ENLISTED RETENTION AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. REF B IS ALNAVRESFOR 023/20 RESERVE COMPONENT PERSONNEL PROGRAMS EXCELLENCE AWARD (RPPEA) BENCHMARKS.// POC/CEDAR/NCCM/COMNAVRESFOR/TEL:(703) 614-4419/ E-MAIL: KIMBERLY.A.CEDAR.MIL(AT)US.NAVY.MIL// RMKS/1. Congratulations to the following echelon 3, 4, and 5 commands for earning the Reserve Personnel Programs Excellence Award (RPPEA). Each command shown, met or exceeded the measures of effectiveness identified in reference (b): a. Ninety percent on the annual Career Information Program Review. b. Seventy-seven percent aggregate reenlistment rate for Zones A through C c. Ninety percent Transition Assistance Program Veteran's Opportunity to Work (VOW) compliance d. Zero unresolved Navy Wide Advancement Exam discrepancies e. Recipients: COMFLELOGSUPPWING COMMARSUPWING COMNAVAIRFORES COMNAVAIRFORES PAC REP COMNAVAIRFORES SEA COMP COMNAVIFORES FORT WORTH TX COMNAVRESFORCOM NORFOLK VA COMTACSUPWING FITRON COM ONE THREE FITRON COMP ONE ONE ONE FITRON COMP ONE TWO FLELOGSUPPRON FIVE FIVE FLELOGSUPPRON FIVE FOUR FLELOGSUPPRON FIVE NINE FLELOGSUPPRON FIVE ONE FLELOGSUPPRON FIVE SEVEN FLELOGSUPPRON SIX TWO FLTREADCEN MID-ATLANTIC DET NEW ORLEANS LA HELMARSTRIKERON SIX ZERO NAVAIRFAC WASH DC NAVAIRLOGOFF NAVIFORESREG MA NORFOLK VA NAVIFORESREG MA NORFOLK VA - JRIC MILLINGTON NAVIFORESREG MA NORFOLK VA - JRIC NORFOLK NAVIFORESREG NORTH GREAT LAKES IL - JRIC MINNEAPOLIS NAVIFORESREG SOUTH FORT WORTH TX NAVIFORESREG SOUTHEAST JACKSONVILLE FL NAVIFORESREG WASHINGTON DC NAVRESCEN ANCHORAGE AK NAVRESCEN AUGUSTA GA NAVRESCEN AVOCA PA NAVRESCEN BILLINGS MT NAVRESCEN BOISE ID NAVRESCEN CORPUS CHRISTI TX NAVRESCEN DECATUR IL NAVRESCEN DENVER CO NAVRESCEN FARGO ND NAVRESCEN FORT CARSON CO NAVRESCEN GREEN BAY WI NAVRESCEN HARLINGEN TX NAVRESCEN HELENA MT NAVRESCEN KANSAS CITY MO NAVRESCEN KNOXVILLE TN NAVRESCEN LAS VEGAS NV NAVRESCEN LITTLE ROCK AR NAVRESCEN MERIDIAN MS NAVRESCEN MINNEAPOLIS MN NAVRESCEN NEWPORT RI NAVRESCEN PEORIA IL NAVRESCEN SALT LAKE CITY UT NAVRESCEN SAN ANTONIO TX NAVRESCEN SAN DIEGO CA NAVRESCEN SHREVEPORT LA NAVRESCEN SPRINGFIELD MO NAVRESCEN SPRINGFIELD OR NAVRESCEN WEST PALM BEACH FL NAVRESCEN WHIDBEY ISLAND WA NAVRESPRODEVCEN NEW ORLEANS NAVRESPRODEVCEN NORFOLK PATRON SIX NINE PATRON SIX TWO REDCOM SOUTHEAST JACKSONVILLE FL REDCOM SOUTHWEST SAN DIEGO CA REDCOM MID ATLANTIC GREAT LAKES IL REDCOM MID ATLANTIC NORFOLK VA STRKFITRON ONE TWO TWO SAU STRKFITRON TWO ZERO FOUR 2. Awardees may fly the Retention Excellence Award pennant to signify receipt of the RPPEA and may paint their command anchor(s) gold until release of the following year's award announcement message. Commander, Navy Reserve Force (CNRF) will provide commendation certificates via Commander, Navy Reserve Forces Command (CNRFC) for all qualifying commands. 3. Reserve Component points of contact: a. Commander Navy Reserve Forces Command, Chief Cheyenne Derrick e-mail: cheyenne.a.derrick.mil(at)us.navy.mil, tel: (757) 322-2490 b. Naval Air Force Reserve, Master Chief Jason Martinez, e-mail: jason.s.martinez10.mil(at)us.navy.mil, tel: (619) 545-8743 c. Navy Reserve Readiness and Mobilization Command Everett, Chief Cierra Bass, e-mail: cierra.a.bass.mil(at)us.navy.mil, tel: (425) 304-3831 d. Navy Reserve Readiness and Mobilization Command San Diego, Chief Laniece Christopher, e-mail: Laniece.a.christopher.mil(at)us.navy.mil, tel: (619) 532-1879 e. Navy Reserve Readiness and Mobilization Command Great Lakes, Chief Brian Hickman, e-mail: brian.c.hickman.mil(at)us.navy.mil, tel: (847) 688-4916 x213 f. Navy Reserve Readiness and Mobilization Command Norfolk, Chief Doug Bass, e-mail: douglas.bass1(at)navy.mil, tel: (757) 341-5966 g. Navy Reserve Readiness and Mobilization Command Jacksonville, Chief Kenneth Swan, e-mail: kenneth.s.swan.mil(at)us.navy.mil tel: (904) 542-8557 h. Navy Reserve Readiness and Mobilization Command Fort Worth, Chief Erik Mendoza, e-mail: erik.mendoza.mil(at)us.navy.mil, tel:(817) 782-1909 i. Fleet Logistics Support Wing, Chief Antwann North, e-mail: antwann.l.north.mil(at)us.navy.mil, tel: (817) 782-7882 j. Tactical Support Wing, Chief Christopher Sistrunk, e-mail: christopher.j.sistrunk.mil(at)us.navy.mil, tel: (817) 782-1527 k. Maritime Support Wing, Chief Jeremy Neal, e-mail: jeremy.s.neal.mil(at)us.navy.mil, tel: (619) 545-2488 4. Congratulations and well done! This award is intentionally competitive and a testimony to each command's commitment to the professional growth and development of our Sailors. Commands emphasizing teamwork and collaboration as reflected by their selection for the RPPEA deliver improved command cohesion, positive command climate and enhanced warfighting effectiveness. Your dedication and commitment to excellence is exemplary. 5. I look forward to seeing those commands that were not selected this year earn their place on the list of award winners next year. Get Busy. 6. Released by VADM J. B. Mustin, Commander, Navy Reserve Force.// BT #0023 NNNN

The commanding officer of the USS George Washington told his crew Thursday that the Navy will begin to move sailors off of the aircraft carrier following a string of suicides and complaints from service members about conditions aboard the ship, whose projected departure from the shipyards has been pushed back once again.

As her one-year anniversary with the Navy approached last May, Hannah Crisostomo swallowed 196 pain relievers. Her organs shut down. Her brain swelled during multiple seizures and she stopped breathing. She was on life support for eight days, during which time doctors had warned her family that she may never regain normal brain functions. When Crisostomo woke up, she immediately wondered why she was still alive. Her thoughts grew more despairing during the next few weeks in the hospital and then in the Navy’s psychiatric ward.

YOKOSUKA NAVAL BASE, Japan – The U.S. Navy tried out a new drone system recently aboard one of its older destroyers, a project that, if successful, could provide low impact, unmanned air support for the warship. The Aerosonde Small Unmanned Aircraft System, property of defense contractor Textron, Inc., successfully completed its first flight on April 4 from the deck of the guided-missile destroyer USS Higgins, according to a company news release that day.

UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 291804Z APR 22 MID600051762833U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 109/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/APR// SUBJ/SECOND CALL FOR APPLICATIONS TO BECOME A CERTIFIED NAVY COACH// REF/A/NAVADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/281804ZSEP21// REF/B/DOC/DAFSLDP PWS/07132021/NOTAL// REF/C/DOC/SECNAV M-5216.5// NARR/REF A IS NAVADMIN 213/21, CALL FOR APPLICATIONS TO BECOME A CERTIFIED NAVY COACH. REF B IS THE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE SENIOR LEADER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT. REF C IS THE NAVY CORRESPONDENCE MANUAL.// RMKS/1. This NAVADMIN solicits applications for uniformed Navy personnel who are also from specific commands and communities to participate in a second call in line with reference (a) to participate in a Department of Defense (DoD) Inter-Service Internal Coaching Training Program in line with reference (b), henceforth known as the Coaching Culture Facilitator Course (CCFC). It is a rigorous 16-week virtual program (31 May 2022 through 13 September 2022) which will prepare participants to educate, promote and foster a coaching culture within their respective service. This CCFC serves as an internal coaching training program offered to create internal coaches across the DoD to enhance the performance of every Service Member and increase warfighter readiness and lethality. The CCFC provides a pathway to increase the number of trained coaches in each service branch. There are 12 Navy quotas in this second call. 2. Description of CCFC a. The CCFC is a 16-week virtual program of instruction which provides 80 hours of coach-specific training across a curriculum approved by the International Coaching Federation (ICF). The curriculum includes 30 hours of coach training for a Leadership Coach Certification from Flatter, Inc., 30 hours of additional coach training to meet the needed 60 hours required for application for an ICF coaching certification, 10 hours of mentor-coaching required for ICF certification and 10 hours of CCFC specific orientation and training. b. The CCFC instructional methodology is focused on providing experiential learning with opportunities for participants to coach other participants and leaders from the course. Classes are conducted during work hours on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays for a total of five hours of training per week for the duration of the course. Content includes lectures, the introduction of coaching tools and case studies. Participants must attend at least 80 percent of class hours live. Missed live classes can be taken asynchronously. 3. Applications must reflect a commitment to building and sustaining a Navy coaching culture. The selection process will focus on personal statements related to interest in becoming a Navy coach, how becoming a Navy coach will contribute to the short-term and long-term career goals of the applicant, the commitment on behalf of the applicant to changing the culture of the Navy through coaching and how the applicant has helped someone develop a plan for reaching a goal. 4. Military Applicant Eligibility Criteria a. Participation is open to all active and Training and Administration of Reserve (TAR) - formerly called full time support - unrestricted line, restricted line and staff corps officers in the permanent grades of O-3 through O-5 and chief warrant officers in the permanent grades of W-2 through W-4. Enlisted participation is open to all active and TAR Sailors in the permanent grades of E-6 through E-8 with a minimum of three years prior to end of active obligated service. b. All applicants, if selected, must also have a minimum of two years remaining on station or have the command provide a recommendation for an extension to meet time on station requirements. c. Applicants must be stationed at one of the following headquarters commands or in a community specified below with two years remaining on station to be eligible for this second CCFC cohort: U.S. Fleet Forces (USFF), U.S. Pacific Fleet (PACFLT), Commander, Naval Air Forces/Commander, Naval Air Forces Pacific (CNAF), Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic (COMNAVAIRLANT), Commander, Submarine Forces/Commander, Naval Submarine Force Atlantic (COMNAVSUBFOR/LANT), Commander, Submarine Forces, U.S. Pacific Fleet (COMNAVSUBPAC), Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet (COMNAVSURFOR), Commander, Naval Surface Force, Atlantic (COMNAVSURFLANT), Naval Special Warfare Command (SPECWAR), Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC), Military Sealift Command (MSC), Bureau Of Medicine And Surgery (BUMED), Commander, Navy Reserve Force (RESFOR), Naval Education And Training Command (NETC), Naval Service Training Command (NSTC), Recruit Training Command (RTC), Officer Training Command (OTC), Naval Leadership And Ethics Center (NLEC), Medical Service Corps Research Psychology Community (2300/SSP 1845), and the Human Resources Community (1200/1207). Applicants from outside these headquarters commands or communities will not be considered for this second CCFC cohort. d. Certified or credentialed coaches and those with an ICF Associate, Professional or Master Certified Coach credential are not eligible to apply for the CCFC. e. Certified or credentialed coaches are asked to contact us at MyNavyCoaching(at)navy.mil and LCDR Greg Hiatt, greg.a.hiatt.mil(at)us.navy.mil so that we may track all members with this valuable skillset. 5. Application requirements. Materials will be submitted via encrypted e-mail to LCDR Greg Hiatt, greg.a.hiatt.mil(at)us.navy.mil no later than 13 May 2022 by 2359 Eastern Standard Time (EST) and will consist of the following documents: a. Authorization, Agreement and Certification of Training (SF-182): Applicants are required to submit an SF-182 signed by their training officer and supervisor. Individual seat expenses will be covered by Navy Personnel Command. Travel is not required and no travel expenses will be reimbursed. An SF-182 template is available at: https://www.mynavyhr.navy.mil/Career-Management/Talent- Management/Coaching/ b. Letter of Intent: Applicants are required to submit a letter of intent with the following information: (1) Last Name, First Name, MI (2) Rank (3) Rate or Designator (4) Command (5) E-mail address (6) Phone Number (7) Position Title, if applicable (8) Location/Address (9) Supervisor Name, Title, Phone Number and e-mail (10) Date of last promotion (11) Projected Rotation Date and/or end of active obligated service (12) List and describe any prior coach training or experience to include relevant coaching certifications or credentials. (13) Name, signature and date for both applicant and supervisor. Digital signatures are acceptable. c. The letter of intent will include essay-style responses with a minimum of 250 words each to the following questions: (1) Why are you interested in becoming a Navy Coach? (2) How would becoming a Navy Coach contribute to your short-term and long-term career goals? (3) What is your commitment to changing the culture of the Navy through coaching? (4) Describe a prior work experience where you have helped someone develop a plan for reaching a goal. How did you help them and support their progress to achieve the goal? d. The letter of intent will also include affirmation of the following statements with signature of the applicant and supervisor: (1) I fully understand the requirements and time commitment of five hours per week for 16 weeks needed to engage in this training program. (2) I agree to provide 100 hours of coaching within two years after completing this training. (3) I agree to provide training to future Navy Coaching Program courses and MyNavy Coaching within the next two years after completing this training. (4) I agree to submit a new supervisor agreement form to the MyNavy Coaching initiative if my supervisor changes for any reason. e. Commanding officer endorsement letter: Refer to reference (c) for letter format. Applicants will be required to submit a signed endorsement letter from their commanding officer. 6. Submission Instructions: All documents (SF-182, letter of intent, and endorsement letter from the commanding officer) are required to be submitted via encrypted e-mail to LCDR Greg Hiatt, greg.a.hiatt.mil(at)us.navy.mil. The file name for the applicant package should be as follows: Last Name_First Name_CCFC2. If you do not receive a confirmation e-mail within five business days of submission, contact the point of contact to confirm receipt. 7. Role of Supervisors a. Coaching is a learning and development activity and therefore is intended to be accomplished during normal duty hours. Supervisors are expected to support the on-duty participation of Service Members as much as possible. Moreover, supporting Service Member participation in no way limits the supervisor to schedule work for the Service Member. All coaching engagements must have approval from immediate supervisors to minimize conflicts with organizational mission priorities. b. Applicants must be volunteers and possess self-awareness, good listening skills, respectfulness, trustworthiness and demonstrate sensitivity and discretion towards the issues of others in the organization. Applicants should also express encouragement and optimism in both easy and difficult situations and demonstrate accountability for self and others. c. Due to the limited number of seats, commands are limited to nominate no more than two personnel per command. 8. Selectees will be required to sign and submit the following three Administrative Remarks, NAVPERS 1070/613: a. CCFC Virtual Training Program Agreement, NAVPERS 1070/613 acknowledging the program requirements during work hours from 1000-1145 EST on Tuesdays and Thursdays and from 1000-1130 EST on Wednesdays for a total of five hours of training per week for a total of 16 weeks (from 31 May 2022 through 13 September 2022). b. Coaching Reciprocation Agreement, NAVPERS 1070/613 to acknowledge the applicant must provide 100 hours of coaching services to Department of the Navy employees over a period of two years. c. Continued Service Agreement, NAVPERS 1070/613 acknowledging the applicant will remain in employment of and serve in the Federal Government for a minimum of three years after completion of the CCFC. The three year obligated service date will commence on the first day following graduation from the training program. 9. Timeline a. Present - 13 May 2022: Application window open. b. 13 May 2022: Applications are due NLT 2359 EST. c. 20 May 2022: Applicants will be notified of selection status via e-mail. d. 21 - 26 May 2022: Selected applicants submit the three required documents in paragraph 8 via e-mail to the designated MyNavy Coaching POC. e. 31 May 2022: Second CCFC cohort begins. 10. Additional frequently asked questions regarding the CCFC and MyNavy Coaching are available at: https://www.mynavyhr.navy.mil/Career-Management/Talent- Management/Coaching/FAQ/. 11. Points of Contact a. MyNavy Coaching Team, (901) 874-2547/DSN 882 or via e-mail: MyNavyCoaching(at)navy.mil. b. LCDR Greg Hiatt, MyNavy Coaching Operations Officer, PERS- 00TMTF, (901) 874-2547/DSN 882 or via e-mail: greg.a.hiatt.mil(at)us.navy.mil. 12. This NAVADMIN will remain in effect until superseded or canceled, whichever occurs first. 13. Released by Vice Admiral John B. Nowell, Jr, N1.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 291703Z APR 22 MID600051762538U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS// TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS// BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 110/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS// SUBJ/2022 BOB FELLER ACT OF VALOR AWARDS // MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/DNS/MAY// RMKS/1. This NAVADMIN solicits nominations for the ninth annual Bob Feller Act of Valor Award for a Chief Petty Officer (CPO) and for the Junior Sailor Peer-to-Peer Mentorship Chapter Award for both afloat and ashore commands. 2. Background. The Bob Feller Act of Valor Foundation established a prestigious award in 2013, named in honor of Major League Baseball (MLB) pitcher, National Baseball Hall of Fame (NBHOF) inductee, and Navy veteran Bob Feller. Mr. Feller enlisted in the Navy shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor while he was with the Cleveland Indians. He served onboard USS Alabama (BB 60) as a Gun Captain, and during his time onboard the ship fought in both World War II theaters, earning eight battle stars. Mr. Feller was released from active-duty having earned the rank of Chief Petty Officer (CPO). 3. Award. This unique award is intended to recognize a representative from three critical areas of Mr. Feller's life: his MLB career, his service in the Navy as a CPO, and his enshrinement in the NBHOF. Accordingly, the award will be presented to one active MLB player, one CPO, and one member of the NBHOF. The Bob Feller Act of Valor Foundation will also recognize a group of Sailors, 18-25 years-old, who have most effectively worked together as a team (in either a personal or professional capacity) to promote peer-to-peer mentorship and a reduction in Sailor destructive decision making and behavior in both afloat and ashore categories. The awards will be presented at the Navy Memorial in Washington, D.C. on 16 November 2022, COVID-19 restrictions permitting. 4. Eligibility and selection criteria. Nominees for the CPO award must be a CPO (E7), active or reserve, and must be outstanding military professionals and leaders in their communities. The following selection criteria for Navy nominees have been prescribed by the Bob Feller Act of Valor Foundation and are based upon the principles by which Mr. Feller lived his life. Nominees must: a. Be outstanding leaders in the performance of all professional responsibilities and serve as an example to peers and subordinates as inspirational leaders. Only those with three years of consistent outstanding documented performance (include three years of evaluations in the nomination package) as a CPO should be considered. Nominees must display good character and humility in their achievements. b. Demonstrate community leadership through volunteer service, holding leadership positions within the organizations they serve. Display a genuine desire to be better today than they were yesterday, and better tomorrow than they are today. Provide an outstanding example of character and dedication to service for all to emulate. c. Put the needs of others before the needs or wants of themselves. This may be documented through evaluations and awards. Both should show they led in the Navy or in their community to benefit the professional and personal development of others. Accomplishments or achievements must be above and beyond the scope of their primary responsibilities. d. Show unyielding support of the United States of America and fellow service men and women by having participated in patriotic events that celebrate all who serve our great nation. These events should be documented individually in the nomination to show the depth of participation in various events over the past three years. e. Above all else, prove to be beyond reproach in the manner in which they conduct themselves, treat others, and live by the Navy core values of Honor, Courage, and Commitment. 5. Nominations for the Junior Sailor Peer-to-Peer Mentorship Chapter Awards (afloat and ashore) can be any group of Sailors 18-25 years-old, who have worked effectively as a team to enhance their command's mission and community's success in a manner consistent with the high ideals and personal example of Bob Feller. Nominated teams of Sailors must consist of junior Sailors who have worked together to promote peer-to-peer mentorship and a reduction in Sailor destructive decision making and behavior. Nominations must reflect accomplishments achieved during the 2022 Fiscal Year. Nomination packages must reflect: a. How the leadership of nominated junior Sailors has provided an example that others desire to emulate and develops a desire for other Sailors to participate in peer-to-peer mentoring. Provide the total number of 18-25 year-old Sailors onboard, the total number of Sailors involved in the peer- to-peer mentoring program, along with the names, rates, and ranks of the Sailors being recognized. Provide the name of the group or team of Sailors (e.g., unit Junior Petty Officer Association, unit chapter of Coalition of Sailors Against Destructive Decisions, unit chapter of Sailors Against Sexual Harassment and/or Assault, or other similar groups) through which the nominated Sailors worked and describe the group's composition, function, and mission. b. Community leadership through volunteer service and a genuine desire to be better today than they were yesterday, and better tomorrow than they are today. Outstanding examples of character and dedication to service for all to emulate may be documented in submitted letters of appreciation and documented proof of community service hours in the nomination package. c. That the group put the needs of others before the needs or wants of themselves. This may be substantiated through awards or evaluations that show actions were performed that are above and beyond their primary scope of responsibilities in the Navy or in their community to benefit the professional and personal development of others. Provide examples of special programs that were promoted with a description of the event and the level of participation and impact hat enabled the greater success of others. d. Unyielding support of the United States of America and fellow service men and women by having participated in patriotic events that celebrate all who serve our great nation. These events should be documented individually in the nomination to show the depth of participation in various events. e. That the group is, above all else, beyond reproach in the manner in which they conduct themselves, treat others, and live the Navy core values of Honor, Courage, and Commitment. 6. Travel and lodging. Travel to and from as well as lodging at the award site will be the responsibility of the award winner's command. For group recognition awards, consideration should be given to remote participation and/or acceptance by a representative on behalf of the award winning group in order to minimize travel costs. 7. Nominations. Fleet, Force Master Chiefs and Echelon 2 Command Master Chiefs may each nominate one CPO and up to two (one ashore and one afloat) Junior Sailor peer-to-peer mentoring groups from their area of responsibility. Nominations must be submitted on official letterhead and specify confidence in the nominee's professionalism as a representative of the Navy, and validity of the nominee's embodiment of the award criteria specified in paragraphs 4 and 5. 8. Nomination packages. Nomination packages must contain four elements: a. Commanding Officer (CO) endorsement. Each nominee's CO must endorse the nomination and express a commitment to facilitate the nominee's attendance at the award ceremony, if selected. b. Narrative description. Substantiate the nominee's or group's embodiment of the award criteria specified above. This may include quantitative and qualitative data. Anecdotal evidence, such as newspaper articles, letters of commendation and appreciation, and other recognition may be included. c. Nominee biography and photo or photo of the group's participants. Group pictures should include as many participating members as possible. If chosen asthe award recipient, the nominee's biography along with a high- resolution photo will be used in printed and online material to publicize and document the award ceremony. The biography should include hometown information as well as professional highlights and qualifications. The biography and photo should be similar to those commonly associated with Navy leader biographies and official portrait photos. d. Evaluations. CPO nomination packages should include the nominee's evaluations from the past three years. 9. Submission procedures. Nominations must be received by 1 July 2022. Nominations may be submitted electronically (preferred) to the point of contact or hard copy to the following address: Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy Attn: Bob Feller Act of Valor Award 2000 Navy Pentagon (4E392) Washington, D.C. 20350-2000 10. Selection process. The Office of the Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy will consolidate all nominations, organize a ranking board, and provide a summary to the Bob Feller Act of Valor Foundation. The Bob Feller Act of Valor Foundation will make the final selection of the winner. The winner will be notified via their nominating Master Chief. The Office of the Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy will notify those not selected. 11. Point of contact is YNC(EXW) Jayna P. Sampson at (703) 614-4854 or via e-mail at Jayna.sampson2(AT)navy.mil. 12. For more information about the Bob Feller Act of Valor Foundation visit https://actofvaloraward.org/. This NAVADMIN should not be interpreted to imply or extend a Department of Defense endorsement to any non-federal entity. 13. Released by Mr. Andrew S. Haeuptle, Director, Navy Staff.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 281601Z APR 22 MID600051755555U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 108/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS// SUBJ/CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS DELEGATION OF AWARDING AUTHORITY FOR MILITARY AWARDS// REF/A/DOC/VCNO/14JUL2003// REF/B/MSG/CNO/281411ZMAY2008// REF/C/MSG/CNO/211502ZFEB2013// REF/D/MSG/CNO/2822172FEB2018// REF/E/DOC/CNO/22FEB2018// REF/F/DOC/SECNAV/28MARCH2019// REF/G/DOC/SECNAV/29MAY2019// REF/H/DOC/SECNAV/16AUG2019 NARR/ REF A IS VCNO LETTER TO CFFC, AUTHORIZING SUBDELEGATION OF THE LM TO O- 8 TYPE COMMANDERS FOR O-6 NAVY PERSONNEL IN THEIR CHAIN OF CMMAND AND OTHER O-6 U.S. ARMED FORCES PERSONNEL ATTACHED TO THEIR ORGANIZATION (WITH PARENT SERVICE CONCURRENCE. REF B IS CNO MSG, POLICY ON CONVERSION OF THE COMBAT INFANTRYMAN BADGE AND COMBAT MEDICAL BADGE TO THE COMBAT RIBBON. REF C IS CNO MSG, CHANGES TO COMBAT ACTION RIBBON ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA. REF D IS CNO MSG, GUIDANCE FOR PROCESSING NEW "V", "C", "R" DEVICES AUTHORIZED FOR WEAR ON CERTAIN MILITARY MEDALS AND RIBBONS. REF E IS CNO LETTER TO COMUSNAVEUR COMUSNAVAF,COMUSNAVCENT, CFFC, COMPACFLT, COMUSNAVSO AND COMNAVSPECWARCOM, DELEGATION OF WARTIME AWARD AUTHORITY. REF F IS SECNAV'S MEMO AUTHORIZING THE COMBAT ACTION RIBBON, STRIKE/FLIGHT AIR MEDAL, AND THE "V", "C", AND "R" DEVICES FOR CERTAIN SPECIAL WARFARE OVERSEAS CONTINGENY OPERATIONS. REF G. REF G IS SECNAVINST 1650.1.J, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY MILITARY AWARDS POLICY. REF H IS SECNAV M.1650.1, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS AWARDS MANUAL. RMKS/1. References (a) through (e) are hereby cancelled. 2. The purpose of this NAVADMIN is to publish the updated Chief of Naval Operations' (CNO) delegation of awarding authority for military awards in accordance references (f) and (g). 3. Delegation of military awarding authority (non-combat). The authority to approve non-combat awards is delegated by CNO to subordinate commanders subject to the following limitations. a. Admirals (O-10): Legion of Merit (LOM) and below with the exception of the Navy and Marine Corps Medal (NM) for grades O-9 and below for all Navy and Marine Corps personnel in their chain of command. b. Vice Admiral (O-9) Commanders: LOM and below with the exception of the NM for grades O-6 and below for all Navy and Marine Corps personnel in their chain of command. c. Rear Admiral (O-8) and Rear Admiral (O-7) in command: Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) and below for grades O-6 and below for all Navy and other U.S. Armed Forces service personnel in their chain of command. Commanders may issue written temporary authorization to an acting commander for greater than 30 days pursuant to the following: (1) If the acting commander is an O-8 or O-7 in command, he or she may be granted authority to award the MSM and below. (2) If the acting commander is an O-6, he or she may be granted authority to award the Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal (NC) and below. d. Rear Admiral (O-7): NC and below for grade O-6 and below for all Navy and other U.S. Armed Forces service personnel in their chain of command. Commanders may issue written temporary authorization to an acting commander for greater than 30 days pursuant to the following: (1)If the acting commander is an O-6, he or she may be granted authority to award the NC and below, for grade O-5 and below. e. Captain (O-6) in command: NC and below for grade O-5 and below for all Navy and other U.S. Armed Forces service personnel in their chain of command. (1)If the acting commander is an O-5, he or she may be granted authority to award the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal (NAM). f. Commander (O-5) and Lieutenant Commander (O-4) in command: NAM for all Navy and other U.S. Armed Forces service personnel in their chain of command. 4. Delegation of military awarding authority (valor and combat awards). The authority to approve valor and combat awards is delegated by CNO to subordinate commanders subject to the following limitations. a. Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command; Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet; Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Europe, U.S. Naval Forces Africa (COMUSNAVEUR USNAVAF), and Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (COMUSNAVCENT) are delegated authority to approve the V, C, and R devices for O-6 and below Navy and Marine Corps personnel under their command for all authorized operations in support of the Global War on Terrorism. Specific authority is granted to approve: Legion of Merit with C or R device (L1, L2) Bronze Star Medal with V device (BV) Purple Heart Medal (only for combat related incidents for actions that occurred within the most recent three years) Meritorious Service Medal with R device (M2) Air Medal with V or C device and on Strike/Flight basis (AH, A1, AS) Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal with V, C, or R device (CV, C1, C2) Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal with C or R device (N1, N2) Combat Action Ribbon (CAR) (only for actions that occurred within the most recent three years) b. COMUSNAVEUR USNAVAF and COMUSNAVCENT may sub-delegate authority to approve the Strike/Flight Air Medal to their subordinate task force commanders who are of Flag and General rank. Sub-delegation is not authorized for the Air Medal when awarded for single mission meritorious achievement (AF) or heroic achievement (AH), nor for award of the Air Medal with the C device (A1). c. Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Southern Command is delegated authority to approve for O-6 and below Navy and Marine Corps personnel under your command all awards listed in subparagraph 4.a with the exception of the Legion of Merit. Commander, Naval Special Warfare Command (COMNAVSPECWARCOM) is delegated authority to approve for O-6 and below Navy and Marine Corps personnel under your command all awards listed in subparagraph 4.a with the exception of the Legion of Merit and the Strike/Flight Air Medal. d. In addition to the delegation cited above, COMUSNAVEUR USNAVAF, COMUSNAVCENT, and COMNAVSPECWARCOM are authorized to approve combat awards commensurate with their authority to qualifying Navy and Marine Corps personnel participating in special operations conducted within the U.S. Central Command and U.S. Africa Command area of responsibility for those operations that do not fall under Operations INHERENT RESOLVE (OIR), FREEDOM'S SENTINEL (OFS), and ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF). This authorization is effective from 23 December 2016 to a date to be determined. (1) This is not a blanket approval of these awards to all participants in these operations. For each individual case, awarding authorities must verify that all criteria for these awards, as contained in references (f) and (g) are met. All operations covered under this authority constitute a single designated operation for purposes of this limitation, i.e. only one CAR may be awarded under this authority. An individual may qualify for a subsequent award of the CAR for active participation in combat within a different designated operation. (2) Delegated authorities are responsible for keeping record of all operations for which combat awards have been authorized. A quarterly report that contains the name of the operation, commencement and termination date will be submitted to the Chief of Naval Operations (DNS-13) for record keeping purposes only. These operations will not be included in the SECNAV M-1650. 5. Awarding Authority Policy: a. Awarding authorities will ensure eligibility requirements and award adjudication are compliant by following the guidelines in references (g) and (h). b. Awarding authority extends only to award nominations that are compliant with statutory and regulatory policy, including time limits. c. Officers exercising delegated awarding authority are not authorized to permit awards to be signed by another individual "By direction" of the awarding authority. d. Except as noted in subparagraph 4.b., no further sub-delegation is authorized. e. CNO may revoke awarding authority from Navy Commanders at any time for non-compliance with awards regulations. 6. This delegation of award approval authority remains effective until rescinded by future correspondence. 7. Released by Andrew S. Haeuptle, Director, Navy Staff.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

The Navy’s Legalman community is seeking motivated E-3 and E-4 Sailors who want to establish a rate or expand their career opportunities through both direct conversion or Professional Apprenticeship Career Track (PACT). This is an outstanding opportunity for Sailors who have good judgement, resourceful in high pressure situations, and excels in a culture of learning.

San Diego, CA (Tribune News Service) -- Unit commanders in the Navy and Marine Corps will no longer have investigative authority over sexual harassment allegations, according to a department-wide message sent Friday by Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro. Effective immediately, the message says, commanding officers must escalate complaints to the next higher-level commander, who will then appoint an investigating officer. That investigator should be from outside the command and “shall not be familiar with the subject or the complainant,” the message says.

UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 261449Z APR 22 MID600051742962U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 107/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/APR// SUBJ/FY-23 NAVY RESERVE E8 AND E9 ADVANCEMENT SELECTION BOARDS RESULTS// REF/A/DOC/BUPERS/19SEP2018// REF A IS BUPERSINST 1430.16G, ADVANCEMENT MANUAL FOR ENLISTED PERSONNEL OF THE U.S. NAVY AND U.S. NAVY RESERVE.// RMKS/1. Congratulations to the following personnel who have been selected for advancement to senior and master chief petty officer by the FY-23 Navy Reserve E8 and E9 Selection Boards. Strong competition between qualified professionals is one of the strengths of our Navy and your selection speaks highly of your abilities. 2. This NAVADMIN is not authorization for advancement. Specific dates of advancement will be published by Commanding Officer, Naval Education and Training Professional Development Center Pensacola, FL. Personnel listed below may be frocked IAW ref (a) if qualified. 3. Members are directed to verify their select status via BUPERS On-Line. The selection list is in alphabetical order by rate within competitive category. Read each line from left to right, name, and numerical order of advancement. Categories of advancement are selected reservist and full time support. Selected Reservist Master Chief ABCM - Master Chief Aviation Boatswains Mate Sweeney Migue 001 AWCM - Master Chief Naval Aircrewman Kern Zachary 002 Valdes Desmon 001 CBCM - Seabee Master Chief Danzy Danny S 002 Davis William 008 Denner Stuart 007 Halleck Thoma 003 Norris Cheryl 001 Sheriff Jason 004 Thompson John 005 Wilmarth Ryan 006 CTTCM - Master Chief Cryptologic Technician Technical Schleef Seth 001 ENCM - Master Chief Engineman Prust Reed Ja 001 GSCM - Master Chief Gas Turbine System Technician Scheck Lucas 001 HMCM - Master Chief Hospital Corpsman Baerwaldt Ros 004 Batayola Mano 001 Kinney Adam F 002 Mills Jeremia 006 Ologun Wale J 007 Parmenter Pau 005 Sadoghianzade 003 ISCM - Master Chief Intelligence Specialist Baluski Sara 002 Naranjo Shann 001 ITCM - Master Chief Information Systems Technician Broderick Joh 002 Burch Whitney 003 Walsh Steven 004 Witherington 001 ITSCM - Master Chief Information Systems Technician Submarines (Communications) Elmore Christ 002 Machado Diego 001 LNCM - Master Chief Legalman Earl Bradley 001 LSCM - Master Chief Logistics Specialist Bailen John E 003 Deffler Krist 001 Taylor Fides 002 MMCM - Master Chief Machinists Mate Crowson James 001 MNCM - Master Chief Mineman Hindley Sean 002 Mathura Richa 001 OSCM - Master Chief Operations Specialist Chapin Joseph 001 SOCM - Master Chief Special Warfare Operator Agopsowicz Ja 001 TMCM - Master Chief Torpedomans Mate Freeman Mathe 001 YNCM - Master Chief Yeoman Phillips Nige 001 Selected Reservist Senior Chief ABFCS - Senior Chief Aviation Boatswains Mate Fuel Handling Colonrivera J 001 Mariano Hecto 002 AGCS - Senior Chief Aerographers Mate Jones Michell 001 AMCS - Senior Chief Aviation Structural Mechanic Alba Caitlin 001 ATCS - Senior Chief Aviation Electronics Technician Costello Chri 003 Cronkhite Jon 002 Lee Raymond C 001 AWFCS - Senior Chief Naval Aircrewmen Mechanical Maldonado Jos 002 Rogers Amanda 003 Stone Melissa 001 AWOCS - Senior Chief Naval Aircrewmen Operator Hooks Grant R 001 Morse Solomon 002 AWSCS - Senior Chief Naval Aircrewman Helicopter Webb Zachery 001 BMCS - Senior Chief Boatswains Mate Arriba Mario 003 Bianchini Gre 006 Campbell Luca 011 Carlin Elizab 012 Danciu Radu A 014 Dequena Kenne 002 Garrick Natha 018 Gonsalves Eon 010 Lively Grant 017 Loa Ernesto 013 Marx Sarah An 008 Maynard Peter 004 Nguyen Daniel 016 Phillips Fred 001 Ramirez Marie 015 Rownd John El 005 Rudolph Wendy 007 Sisk Anita An 009 CECS - Senior Chief Construction Electrician Steinke Jason 001 CMCS - Senior Chief Construction Mechanic Bartholomew J 001 Devries Staci 004 Martin Jonath 003 Warnke Tyler 002 CTNCS - Senior Chief Cryptologic Technician Networks Hillegas Bria 001 CTRCS - Senior Chief Cryptologic Technician Collection Jaspers Ryan 001 CTTCS - Senior Chief Cryptologic Technician Technical Fahrer Kevin 001 Hartman Petri 002 Vansyckel Chr 003 CUCS - Senior Chief Constructionman Campbell Clin 001 Emry Mckenna 008 Nausley Grego 010 Nemet Michael 011 Ryan Terence 002 Shore Jerry 004 Speicher Jeff 003 Stowers Chad 006 Taylor David 005 Whitehead Cha 009 Yaccarino Dan 007 EMCS - Senior Chief Electricians Mate Darlin Keith 005 Doyle William 002 Park Ji Ho 001 Pizarro Micha 004 Sorensen Doug 003 ENCS - Senior Chief Engineman Sacco Steven 001 EOCS - Senior Chief Equipment Operator Fritz Douglas 001 Simmons Casey 002 EODCS - Senior Chief Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technician Krohe Brian G 001 ETCS - Senior Chief Electronic Technician Butler Timoth 006 Dehaven Brand 008 Fike John Cal 005 Frazier Lavau 002 Silbaugh Pame 003 Tiner Jeffrey 004 Washington Te 007 Wilt Dwight J 001 ETVCS - Senior Chief Electronics Technician, Submarine, Navigation Curiel Joh C 001 GMCS - Senior Chief Gunners Mate King Morgan M 001 Smith Amber L 003 Wallis Josh J 002 Ward Brett Ro 004 GSCS - Senior Chief Gas Turbine System Technician Siever Nichol 001 HMCS - Senior Chief Hospital Corpsman Allen Bryan J 010 Barthold Davi 001 Columbo Josep 005 Conklin Tad E 004 Delapuente Al 015 Espinoza Emil 007 Jimenez Eliza 014 Juarez David 008 Leach Bradley 013 Macpartland R 003 Ronchetto Jen 012 Rush Donna Le 011 Schneider Jer 009 Strotz Adam C 006 Tompkins Lind 002 HTCS - Senior Chief Hospital Corpsman Braden Christ 001 Downs Michael 003 Kessie Travis 002 Weatherford L 004 ISCS - Senior Chief Intelligence Specialist Condori Paul 001 Cunningham Sh 004 Morotti Micke 003 Warren Christ 002 ITCS - Senior Chief Information Systems Technician Armstead Ambr 008 Bair Micheal 007 Griffin Vanes 006 Macdonald Gor 003 Pang Christop 005 Teson Joseph 004 Umali Eric Ja 001 Worrells Jere 002 ITSCS - Senior Chief Information Systems Technician Submarines (Communications) Bryant Samuel 004 Leaf Joshua D 001 Timm Patrick 002 Wolff Brandon 003 LNCS - Senior Chief Legalman Crespo Meliss 003 Murray Marsha 001 Perez Elvira 002 LSCS - Senior Chief Logistics Specialist Amartey Arnol 005 Andreou Charl 004 Bonhomme Leon 003 Burke Karen E 002 Chalmers Kevi 008 Daubenmeyer J 010 Galvanescobed 012 Hobson Charle 011 Lauderdale Al 006 McCartan Lori 001 Render Dana M 007 Wisdom Jeffre 009 MACS - Senior Chief Master At Arms Albee Trent A. 014 Badgett Randy 006 Cruz Mary Sus 011 Dolan Heather 007 Flynn Noel Ch 013 Geidel Sarah 001 Hunt Joshua P 015 Knight Shawn 009 Lovett Randal 004 Lubawski Thom 010 Maguire Chris 002 Monson Justin 016 Palmer Harris 008 Payams Albert 017 Rasmussen Bre 005 Richter Willi 012 Soldatke Sara 003 MCCS - Senior Chief Mast Communications Specialist Danals Gina K 001 MMCS - Senior Chief Machinists Mate Buenaflor Orl 001 Hilts Thorne 002 NDCS - Senior Chief Navy Diver Moehring Timo 003 Simpson Josep 001 Stimel Christ 002 OSCS - Senior Chief Operations Specialist Anderson Step 001 Meyers Joseph 002 Wise Jennifer 003 PRCS - Senior Chief Aircrew Survival Equipmentman Jacome Diego 001 RPCS - Senior Chief Religious Program Specialist Brown Nina 001 STSCS - Senior Chief Sonar Technician Submarine Looney Joshua 002 Nix Thomas Le 001 UTCS - Senior Chief Utilitiesman Castro Christ 001 YNCS - Senior Chief Yeoman Beglau Gregg 007 Croston Darle 003 Ferebee Barba 005 Mcfarlane Rob 006 Raboy Fae Isi 004 Ramirez Jose 002 Ross Antonio 008 Thurston Robi 001 Training and Administration of the Reserves Master Chief AFCM - Master Chief Aircraft Maintenanceman Carson Fernan 003 Hawver Ray Al 002 Turner Stephe 001 AVCM - Master Chief Avionics Maintenance Technician Coffelt Chris 001 Zimmerman Jos 002 AWFCM - Master Chief Naval Aircrewman Mechanical Boubion Micha 001 Gray Shawn Mi 002 AZCM - Master Chief Aviation Maintenance Administrationman Chapman Takis 001 BMCM - Master Chief Boatswains Mate Jenkins Gary 001 DCCM - Master Chief Damage Controlman Lapera Alexis 001 HMCM - Master Chief Hospital Corpsman Mathis Michae 001 LSCM - Master Chief Logistics Specialist Henry Omni Mi 001 Pritchett Jos 001 YNCM - Master Chief Yeoman Brockett Sher 002 Hernandez Pau 001 Ribeiro David 003 Training and Administration of the Reserves Senior Chief ADCS - Senior Chief Aviation Machinists Mate Cummings Gera 001 Derbyshire Ro 002 AECS - Senior Chief Aviation Electricians Mate Cassa Michael 001 Dellinger Tin 002 AMCS - Senior Chief Aviation Structural Mechanic Beauprez Trav 005 Dyer Christop 004 Gray William 007 Harris John S 006 Johnson Ryan 002 Mcfarland Jam 003 Wirth Kelsey 008 Yurasko Rober 001 AOCS - Senior Chief Aviation Ordnanceman Debrie Bryan 002 Jones Melody 003 Wesley Ledarr 001 ATCS - Senior Chief Aviation Electronics Technician Bond Stephen 003 Hurst Adrian 004 Payne Matthew 001 Summy Zachary 002 AWFCS - Senior Chief Naval Aircrewmen Mechanical Brewer Jeremy 005 Carter Tracy 004 Collins Jonat 001 Strunks Paul 003 Truax Jessica 002 BMCS - Senior Chief Boatswains Mate Aguilar Lesli 003 Bruce Robert 005 Burkes Jarvis 001 Ortiz Brandon 002 Vietmeier Gar 004 DCCS - Senior Chief Damage Controlman Brooks Andrew 001 EMCS - Senior Chief Electricians Mate Byers Thomas 002 Riofriocabrer 004 Taylor Jesse 003 Torres Joseph 001 ETCS - Senior Chief Electronic Technician Petrycki Will 002 Potter Michae 003 Zimmermann Pa 001 HMCS - Senior Chief Hospital Corpsman Dayrit David 003 Hursh Steven 002 Soto Monica L 001 ITCS - Senior Chief Information Systems Technician Fertig Jonath 008 Hall Apryl Sh 003 LSCS - Senior Chief Logistics Specialist Boltz Dennis 001 Jit Alvinesh 005 Perdue Rodney 003 Ponce Adam Mi 004 Stanton Yinet 002 NCCS - Senior Chief Navy Counselor (Recruiter) Dickey Savana 004 Frick Josh M 001 Hammonds Josh 005 Kinder Michae 009 Moore Lamar R 007 Moses Andrew 003 Nowell Leroy 008 Trombley Todd 006 Weaver Deneet 002 NCCS - Senior Chief Navy Counselor (Counselor) Herrera Milto 005 PSCS - Senior Chief Personnel Specialist Dixon Robyn 003 Ford Cadace 004 Malone Alisci 002 Zendejas Isma 001 YNCS - Senior Chief Yeoman Ashley Marque 006 Boyd Melissa 003 Clarke Sherwi 005 Jenkins Melis 004 Lang Kelda Ho 002 Smith Ebony A 001 4. Released by Vice Admiral John B. Nowell, Jr, N1.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

April 26 (Reuters) - Balfour Beatty Communities, one of the U.S. military's largest private landlords, continues placing the health of service members and their families at risk even after pleading guilty last year to defrauding the U.S. government and being levied a $65 million fine, a Senate investigation being released Tuesday found.

Navy separations due to COVID-19 vaccine refusal dropped over the past week, the result of the injunction preventing the sea service from separating those who applied for religious waivers. The Navy reports approved separations each week in the service’s COVID-19 update. Due to a class-action lawsuit against the Navy and Department of Defense officials, the service cannot separate anyone who submitted a religious exemption request, which halted some of the approved separations, Lt. Travis Callaghan said in an email.