Tony

The Orders Project is a non-partisan program created by the National Institute of Military Justice® (NIMJ) to assist military personnel in understanding their options when faced with orders they believe may not be legal.

NAVADMIN 236/25

NAVADMIN 237/25

NAVADMIN 238/25

Clearly, Admiral Frank M. Bradley should have known better. One big lesson he has learned with politics is exactly how he got thrown under the bus. Hopefully he will share that with the public when he is put under oath with the pending House or Senate investigations, or both... Senator Kelly was right - Don't follow illegal orders (video.) It's against the law... The Defense Department's Law of War Manual uses shooting shipwrecked survivors as an example of an illegal order that service members are obligated to refuse. "For example, orders to fire upon the shipwrecked would be clearly illegal," the manual states. Don't Give Up the Ship... Chain of Command in Illegal Strike: President Trump Pete Hegseth Admiral Frank M. Bradley And please remember that congress never declared war or used the Authorizations for the Use of Military Force (AUMFs) Seal Team 6 Yes, the Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war, but the United States has not issued a formal declaration of war since World War II. Instead, Congress has frequently authorized military force through less formal means, such as Authorizations for the Use of Military Force (AUMFs), which has become the predominant method for permitting military action. Article here on portions of subject: White House defends Hegseth and second strike on boat near Venezuela A Navy admiral and not Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth directed a September strike on a suspected drug boat near Venezuela where the military was reportedly ordered to kill survivors, the White House said Monday.

"The White House throwing Adm. Bradley under the bus"... - Admiral Frank M. Bradley

Senator Kelly was right to make that video. Admiral Frank Bradley is being blame by the trump administration, and Hedgehog is being absolved... “Does the administration deny that that second strike happened,” a reporter asked, “or did it happen and the administration denies that Secretary Hegseth gave the order?” Admiral Frank M. Bradley

White House Press Secretary Karolying Leavitt has released the MRI results. US President Donald Trump had cardiovascular and abdominal checks when he had an MRI scan, the White House has confirmed. Press secretary Karolying Leavitt said the scan was "preventative" amid growing concerns for trump's health and cognitive abilities. My Opinion: Okay then, if there are concerns about trump's health and cognitive abilities, why did he have "cardiovascular and abdominal checks" according to Karolying Leavitt's MRI results? I did an AI search of what men 79 years old usually have an MRI scan done for and these are the results: A 79-year-old man might need an MRI to diagnose or monitor neurological issues like stroke, Alzheimer's, or Parkinson's, investigate symptoms like headaches or memory loss, and assess other age-related conditions like cancer, joint problems, or brain changes. MRIs can provide detailed images of soft tissues, helping doctors find issues that are not always apparent through routine exams. Neurological and Cognitive Health Stroke and brain changes: An MRI can identify signs of a past stroke or other brain changes. Dementia and Alzheimer's: It can help detect early signs of Alzheimer's and other dementias, which can be missed by standard exams. Parkinson's disease: It can aid in diagnosing conditions like Parkinson's, which involves problems with movement, stiffness, and balance. Tumors: An MRI is crucial for detecting brain tumors. Cancer and Other Diseases Cancer detection: A full-body MRI can help detect early signs of cancer in various organs. Prostate cancer: While screening decisions are complex for this age group, an MRI can provide detailed information about the prostate, especially if symptoms are present. Other Conditions Joint and bone issues: An MRI can help evaluate bone and joint problems, including those related to arthritis or other degenerative conditions. Muscle and tissue problems: The scan can identify issues with muscles and other soft tissues that may affect mobility and function. Hearing loss: An MRI can help determine if hearing loss in one ear is caused by a brain tumor

The Constellation | Navy HR Service | Dec 2025

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED/ ROUTINE R 011642Z DEC 25 MID120012254820U FM CHINFO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 239/25 MSGID/NAVADMIN/CHINFO WASHINGTON DC/NOV// SUBJ/MASS COMMUNICATION SPECIALIST PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION STANDARD PROGRAM// REF/A/DOC/CHINFOINST 1510.1 MASS COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION STANDARD (PQS) PROGRAM DATED 26 NOV 25 REF/B/DOC/ OPNAVINST 3500.24 (Series) PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION STANDARDS PROGRAM REF/C/DOC/NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING (NAVETRA) 43242-B POC/MCCM HOLLY GRAY/PROGRAM COORDINATOR/HOLLY.A.BOYNTONGRAY.MIL(AT)US.NAVY.MIL/ RMKS/1. To initialize procedures and identify regional qualifiers for the Mass Communication Specialist (MC) Personnel Qualification Standard (PQS) program, this instruction establishes guidance in accordance with references (a) through (c). These guiding instructions define the qualification standards, Navy-wide PQS policy, and education and training requirements necessary for MCs serving in Public Affairs (PA) or Visual Information (VI) assignments, and provide the governing framework for completing sections 301- 304 of the MC PQS. 2. This NAVADMIN applies to both Active and Reserve Public Affairs Officers (PAO). The program is mandatory for Active component and optional for the Reserve component. 3. All MCs are required to complete their pay grade-normed watch station at a minimum. Non-MCs, such as personnel assigned to PA or VI duties or developing their MC skills, may complete the PQS with approval from their chain of command. 4. Released by RDML J. A. Robinson III, Chief of Information.// BT #0001 NNNN CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED/

Who is telling the truth? (neither party...)

A three-judge panel on the appeals court, in a 32-page opinion, unanimously upheld an Aug. 21 ruling from a lower federal court that Habba was unlawfully appointed.

The press secretary, Karolying Leavitt, has said that the president received “advanced imaging” at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center “as part of his routine physical examination” and that the results showed Trump remains in “exceptional physical health.”

In my opinion, the reason trump said he wouldn't have wanted a second hit is that he wants to covering his butt for any possible investigation or litigation. He'd rather Pentagon pete walk the plank. He probably slept good that night... “I wouldn’t have wanted that, not a second strike,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned to Washington. “The first strike was very lethal; it was fine. And if there were two people around … but Pete said that didn’t happen. I have great confidence in him. “I’m going to find out about it, but Pete said he did not order the death of those two men.” Admiral Frank M. Bradley

Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., said Sunday he believes "it's very possible there was a war crime committed" in the administration's first strike against an alleged drug trafficking boat in the Caribbean Sea in September. "I think it's very possible there was a war crime committed. Of course, for it to be a war crime, you have to accept the Trump administration's whole construct here ... which is we're in armed conflict, at war with this particular -- with the drug gangs. Of course, they've never presented the public with the information they've got here," Van Hollen said on ABC News' "This Week." "If that theory is wrong, then it's plain murder." So if war crimes were committed, Admiral Frank M. "Mitch" Bradley and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth would most likely be the two upfront characters that would be tried, I believe by a military court. However, if it is not classified as war they would be tried for murder. Others most likely would be involved... According to recent news reports based on leaked information, U.S. Navy Admiral Frank M. "Mitch" Bradley ordered a second missile strike on two survivors of an alleged drug-trafficking boat in the Caribbean in September 2025. This was reportedly done to comply with a directive from Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to "kill everybody" on board the vessel.

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), a member of the Armed Services Committee, said Sunday that the body will put military officials “under oath” regarding reported follow-up strikes on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean. “We’re going to have an investigation,” Kelly told host Kristen Welker on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “We’re going to have a public hearing. We’re going to put these folks under oath. And we’re going to find out what happened. And then, there needs to be accountability.”

A biographer has revealed some of Donald Trump's disgusting bedroom habits that have caused chaos in the White House.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon’s investigation of Sen. Mark Kelly over a video that urges American troops to defy “illegal orders” has raised a slew of questions, and some criticism, from legal experts. Some say the Pentagon is misreading military law to go after Kelly as a retired Navy fighter pilot. Others say the Arizona Democrat cannot be prosecuted as a member of Congress. A group of former military prosecutors insists he did nothing wrong.

Shame on the U.S. Navy... During the 2 September operation, led by the elite counter-terrorist group Seal Team 6, a first missile strike left two survivors clinging on to the wreck, the Post reported. Adm Frank M “Mitch” Bradley, head of Special Operations Command, reportedly ordered a second strike to kill the two survivors to comply with Hegseth’s orders.

A live drone feed showed two survivors from the original crew of 11 clinging to the wreckage of their boat following the initial missile attack on Sept. 2, The Post reported on Friday afternoon. The Special Operations commander overseeing the operation then ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth’s directive, according to two people with direct knowledge of the operation, killing both survivors. Those people, along with five others in the original report, spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the matter’s sensitivity. Late Friday, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Mississippi), the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Sen. Jack Reed (D-Rhode Island), the committee’s ranking Democrat, issued a statement saying that the committee “is aware of recent news reports — and the Department of Defense’s initial response — regarding alleged follow-on strikes on suspected narcotics vessels.”

Shame on the U.S. Navy who executed those survivors... The U.S. Secretary of WAAH Pete Hedgehog could face a war crimes prosecution over a claim that he ordered a second strike to kill the survivors of a missile attack on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean. “Mark my words: It may take some time, but Americans will be prosecuted for this, either as a war crime or outright murder.”

"To all Airlines, Pilots, Drug Dealers, and Human Traffickers, please consider THE AIRSPACE ABOVE AND SURROUNDING VENEZUELA TO BE CLOSED IN ITS ENTIRETY," Trump said in a post. Trump's comments come about a week after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) warned airlines about flying over Venezuela. The FAA issued a notice urging airlines to "exercise caution" due to the "potentially hazardous situation" in the region.

This guy is so strange... While speaking to troops at Ford Campbell, Ky., on Nov. 26, Vance, 41, railed against the bird, asking the troops, “Who really likes — be honest with yourself — who really likes turkey?”

Shame on the U.S. Navy... When two survivors emerged from the wreckage, a Special Operations commander overseeing the attack ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth’s instructions to “kill everybody,” according to The Washington Post, citing officials with direct knowledge of the operation.

People briefed on the “double-tap” strike, said they were concerned that it could violate the law of armed conflict, which prohibits the execution of an enemy combatant who is “hors de combat,” or taken out of the fight due to injury or surrender. “They’re breaking the law either way,” said Sarah Harrison, a former associate general counsel at the Pentagon who now serves as a senior analyst at the Crisis Group think tank. “They’re killing civilians in the first place, and then if you assume they’re combatants, it’s also unlawful — under the law of armed conflict, if somebody is ‘hors de combat’ and no longer able to fight, then they have to be treated humanely.”