Forum | Advancement | Career | Veteran | Bases | Enlisted Portal


Tony

FY18 Chief Selection Board

Rate this topic

241 posts in this topic

Quote

 

Package is going to finally be sent off tomorrow, as I will be out of pocket this next month. My OMPF had a lot of duplicates in FC 30, and I had a FC 38 that was incorrectly coded. Now my OMPF is squeaky clean all my awards except for a few that I recently received is in my OMPF as well.  The others are reflected in my LTR to the Board.

I only have two items that might be the deciding factor as to whether I get selected, one is a 1of 1 MP which unfortunately will not drop off until next cycle and although my eval was good it really does not reflect a breakout  from lasts years eval.  I honestly thought I had checked everything in my OMPF last cycle and was surprised by what I found that needed to be corrected, especially that FC 38 WOW, that could have been the deciding factor, who knows.  Lesson learned, you need to open each FC from 30-38. The Board members only have a few minutes to screen each record so you don't want them screening duplicates. 

I hope everyone the best in completing your packages, see ya in a few! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, SeaBeeDoc said:

I honestly thought I had checked everything in my OMPF last cycle and was surprised by what I found that needed to be corrected, especially that FC 38 WOW, that could have been the deciding factor, who knows.

FC 38 Adverse Information. Anyone can help me what are the samples of adverse information? I have blank on my OMPF. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To: "mill_ompf-chg@navy.mil"

Subject: Corrections in OMPF (UNCLASSIFIED)

Date: Monday, March 13, 2017 3:49:00 PM

The following documents are blank pages and need to be omitted from my OMPF.

NAVPERS 1070/610 Change of Rate, Document ID 11725493

The following are documents are duplicates that needs to omitted from my OMPF

DD 214, Document ID 225180, Field Code 33, pg. 2

The FC 38 it was a unauthorized absence when I open it , it was actually a History of Assignments.

This is how I submitted it. 

 

 

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is there anyone that is stationed in Lemoore on here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I will get wide varying opinions.  Should I include my PRIMS printout in my LTB? No less than Excellent PFA score since 2011. Looking for pros and cons. I am of opinion that it should in fact hold weight, I am not getting by on the bare minimum consistently. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question to all of the CPO's, SCPO's, and MCPO's in this forum. Should I submit a most updated NAVPERS 1070/880 Awards Records as an enclosure in my LTB?  My NAVPERS 1070/880 Awards Record that's currently in my OMPF is when I reenlisted in 2013.  Since then, I've received awards and added awards that weren't in my 2013 NAVPERS 1070/880 Awards Record. Not sure if I should submit a most recent one. Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, LSHARP said:

I know I will get wide varying opinions.  Should I include my PRIMS printout in my LTB? No less than Excellent PFA score since 2011. Looking for pros and cons. I am of opinion that it should in fact hold weight, I am not getting by on the bare minimum consistently. 

no you don't have to because your PRT score is on your eval and plus I believe that they look at your PRIMS data anyways.  anything that is on your eval or that is already in your record you should not have to submit because the board will see that already. now if you know if you have completed something recently and if you have doubts about it making it to you record on time, then definitely send it in. I hope that this helps you out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, navyordie123 said:

no you don't have to because your PRT score is on your eval and plus I believe that they look at your PRIMS data anyways.  anything that is on your eval or that is already in your record you should not have to submit because the board will see that already. now if you know if you have completed something recently and if you have doubts about it making it to you record on time, then definitely send it in. I hope that this helps you out.

I was more looking toward the fact that I am not getting only a satisfactory I have been going above and beyond to maintain an excellent score since 2011. Navy eval only says PP everyone who hasn't failed has that. But if they look at it already then no need. Thanks. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, LSHARP said:

I was more looking toward the fact that I am not getting only a satisfactory I have been going above and beyond to maintain an excellent score since 2011. Navy eval only says PP everyone who hasn't failed has that. 

are you a CFL? cause if you are that is on your eval and the board will know that you have been getting those scores but if you aren't then I would ask a Chief and see what the board looks at and if they don't look at that then definitely send it in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, navyordie123 said:

..... plus I believe that they look at your PRIMS data anyways.  .......

 

27 minutes ago, LSHARP said:

........ But if they look at it already then no need. Thanks. 

The board does not see PRIMS data, Check out slide #7 of the ENLISTED SELECTION BOARD BRIEF at http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/boards/activedutyenlisted/Pages/GeneralInformation.aspx

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, SUBLANT said:

 

The board does not see PRIMS data, Check out slide #7 of the ENLISTED SELECTION BOARD BRIEF at http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/boards/activedutyenlisted/Pages/GeneralInformation.aspx

That's what I thought originally. Physical fitness is not as big of a factor for promotion as some of the other branches. I just don't know if it's worth it to submit. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, LSHARP said:

That's what I thought originally. Physical fitness is not as big of a factor for promotion as some of the other branches. I just don't know if it's worth it to submit. 

Sorry for any misinformation. I thought that they might look at it, that's why I had said what I did. Thanks for the information SUBLANT.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Peeking my head in here for the first time in a while. If any FCPO's need help with their LTB, reach out to me. I'll do what I can. Best of luck come August!

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone. My first post here. Does anyone have an LTB that contains explanations, not just the standard sample from NPC? I'm just trying to see the verbiage and the correct way to write it. Also, would it be necessary to point out how I overcame LIMDU and 3 PRT waivers? I got healthy, lost almost 40 lbs., got outstanding last cycle and became an ACFL/95PT. Not an easy task but I'm not sure if that matters to the board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a question regarding OMPF Field Codes. So if your other field codes on  your record are not up-to-date, do you need to include it on your LTB as well? I am not talking about Evals and Awards Field Code. I am talking about like, History of assignments, Page 4, School Transcript, Re-enlistment Agreement, Extension Agreement, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My first command isn't in my PSR but it is in my history of assignments. How much of an issue is this? I was active duty my first command before I converted to FTS. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any word on when the Reserve Selection Board Eligibility will be announced?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Little birdie tells me they will be late as a nasty gram went out to reserve commands about not having tests in in time. That was as of last weekend at drill. I'm still waiting on my SSB results for CPO from last year. Board was in Feb 2017 and I'm the only person being looked at for a failure by NEOAS

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

little birdie lied. results are out at the triad level. found out I made board. waiting on quotas so I can get an answer for last years board. gotta steal a quota from this year. good luck to all of you on making board.  lets get our packages square and off by 1 May.  heard that date is staying and they are not pushing to the right at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/4/2017 at 0:28 AM, Yamzi-USN said:

Got a question regarding OMPF Field Codes. So if your other field codes on  your record are not up-to-date, do you need to include it on your LTB as well? I am not talking about Evals and Awards Field Code. I am talking about like, History of assignments, Page 4, School Transcript, Re-enlistment Agreement, Extension Agreement, etc.

If it is not documented in your OMPF, don't send it in. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there an official naval message on how to do your LTB? Some type of guidance? I know there is a sample LTB in NPC website but is it just that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 5 USMAP completion certificate on me. I decided to include a FLTMPS Qualification/Certification Data print out (1 page) which has all my USMAP completion listed on it for my LTB.  But one of the Chiefs told me that I should submit the actual certification instead. (all five certificates).

I feel like, why would I submit all 5 pages if I can just submit 1 page that shows all of my completed USMAP?  The document came from FLTMPS website so it should be an official document right? Any thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/30/2017 at 8:16 AM, ITJuan(IW/SW/AW) 009 said:

Question to all of the CPO's, SCPO's, and MCPO's in this forum. Should I submit a most updated NAVPERS 1070/880 Awards Records as an enclosure in my LTB?  My NAVPERS 1070/880 Awards Record that's currently in my OMPF is when I reenlisted in 2013.  Since then, I've received awards and added awards that weren't in my 2013 NAVPERS 1070/880 Awards Record. Not sure if I should submit a most recent one. Thank you.

If you think it is worth showing and you have numerous awards added, then yes. 2013 was a long time ago have you not PCSd or reenlistment since then?

i was in the same shoes and added mine to my LTB. Good luck 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/30/2017 at 3:20 AM, LSHARP said:

I know I will get wide varying opinions.  Should I include my PRIMS printout in my LTB? No less than Excellent PFA score since 2011. Looking for pros and cons. I am of opinion that it should in fact hold weight, I am not getting by on the bare minimum consistently. 

I would advice no. PFA is a post board scrub process.

it is similar to sending in your exam profile sheet. All the board wants to know if you passed/fail.

I agree how PFA should hold weight...more power to you and keep them scores high 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 25 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online