Jump to content
Navy Forum for Enlisted, Reserves, Veterans, Chiefs & Spouses

FY 24 CPO (E7) Selection Board

Tony
 Share

Recommended Posts

Forever1st Newbie

Forever1st

Posted
Posted

I have no lessons. I am bitter. This is the end. Over 19 years of service (11 years SBE) to include 3 PCS afloat tours. I had command collaterals (MWR, 3MA, CFL, SSO/SECMAN), LPO Sea and shore. 2 degrees, MOVSM, 3x sailor of quarter only. both my parents died when I was deployed, wasn't allowed to go home for one of them. My 13 year old has significant health problems and feels neglect from his only parent being gone most his life while his successful WO father wants nothing to do with him and never met him nor talk to him. It upsets me to see year after year  unexperienced and/or terrible/mean people make chief. I am not perfect, but this definitely not a fair process. I have a theory that either I pissed off someone with power or only the cool kids and someone whos a spouse of a cool E7 and above get to advance, because you cannot honestly say that someone with less than 7 years who never PCS to a ship and doesn't have 3M quals is better qualified to be a chief. 

  • Like 1
scottastic86 Newbie

scottastic86

Posted
Posted

I think for me my lesson learned is that I truly underestimated not having documented FCPOA involvement.  I have one E-6 eval from about 6 years ago that has a bullet for FCPOA/CPO365 (when that was a thing).  I've followed as much of my LaDR as I can so aside from not having a breakout eval, I feel that might be the only other thing holding me back.  Here's hoping that being a cabinet member this year is the difference between an S and another N.

Master_Spook Apprentice

Master_Spook

Posted
Posted
On 9/19/2022 at 9:44 AM, scottastic86 said:

I think for me my lesson learned is that I truly underestimated not having documented FCPOA involvement.  I have one E-6 eval from about 6 years ago that has a bullet for FCPOA/CPO365 (when that was a thing).  I've followed as much of my LaDR as I can so aside from not having a breakout eval, I feel that might be the only other thing holding me back.  Here's hoping that being a cabinet member this year is the difference between an S and another N.

Are you breaking out in traffic?

Master_Spook Apprentice

Master_Spook

Posted
Posted

your evals would say "My #X of XX PO1s!" or "My #1 technician afloat!"...something that breaks you out from your peers.  Are you tracking to the right on your PSR? As in, you check aboard, P to MP or EP and stay there until next assignment.  Sustained superior performance is often overlooked when we rattle off our accomplishments but from a board perspective, it's the first thing we see. 

  • Spot On! 1
  • 4 weeks later...
The(SW/AW) Pusher Apprentice

The(SW/AW) Pusher

Posted
Posted
On 9/29/2022 at 12:33 AM, Master_Spook said:

your evals would say "My #X of XX PO1s!" or "My #1 technician afloat!"...something that breaks you out from your peers.  Are you tracking to the right on your PSR? As in, you check aboard, P to MP or EP and stay there until next assignment.  Sustained superior performance is often overlooked when we rattle off our accomplishments but from a board perspective, it's the first thing we see. 

👆🏾

  • Thank You 1
OG Ron C Rookie

OG Ron C

Posted
Posted

Yea I definitely agree that it sometimes doesn’t make sense that you can make all these things happen and don’t get pick up for chief time and time again. Also you get your record seen and no Master Chief can tell you anything except for keep doing what you do and your time will come. It gets frustrating but it is what it is.
I just wish that they would tell me what needs to be done, cause I just don’t see it.

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
OG Ron C Rookie

OG Ron C

Posted
Posted

Just got my eval back and I really was not understanding why they scored me so high. Last year just reporting to the command, so of course I got the P as usual. But this year I got the #2 EP which made my head scratch so much because how am I suppose to growth if it just that high. Most of my E-6 evil were MP because I was stuck in traffic and transfer EP then the P back to EP. I don’t know how the board would view it but only time will tell as this is my 6th time going up.

  • 2 weeks later...
DaddyGuns Rookie

DaddyGuns

Posted
Posted
On 12/6/2022 at 4:11 PM, OG Ron C said:

Just got my eval back and I really was not understanding why they scored me so high. Last year just reporting to the command, so of course I got the P as usual. But this year I got the #2 EP which made my head scratch so much because how am I suppose to growth if it just that high. Most of my E-6 evil were MP because I was stuck in traffic and transfer EP then the P back to EP. I don’t know how the board would view it but only time will tell as this is my 6th time going up.

If you’re past the growth portion and in that EP range then moving forward you have to show what you’ll see in the precepts and LADR a lot “SUSTAINED SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE”. The board will look at your PSR and they can see your transfers, how long you’ve been on board present command, changes in reporting Senior, and they will take all of that in account. Going from that “welcome aboard” P to an EP shows that’s growth that they wanna see establishing yourself in the command. Now you just need the write up to match. Biggest thing I always failed to remember is that you’re not just fighting everyone in your command, you’re fighting all the other first classes in your rate that will potentially be board eligible. Make sure your evals reflect the LADR and focus on those quals and considerations for E7. 

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
FisherHook Apprentice

FisherHook

Posted
Posted
On 9/28/2022 at 10:33 AM, Master_Spook said:

your evals would say "My #X of XX PO1s!" or "My #1 technician afloat!"...something that breaks you out from your peers.  Are you tracking to the right on your PSR? As in, you check aboard, P to MP or EP and stay there until next assignment.  Sustained superior performance is often overlooked when we rattle off our accomplishments but from a board perspective, it's the first thing we see. 

I like this information. I think what I was missing was a letter explaining why I am on this 3 yr rotation shore then sea, getting welcome aboard P, progress to EP, then get P again after rotating to new command. Some people say they should know ur mil to mil. apparently not. Also, my question is, what is the statistics have to do with this, showing race and how many male or female in each rate, etc.  They showed it last cycle when the results came out

  • Like 2
Stockage Newbie

Stockage

Posted
Posted

Did not make the SBE list for the first time. I am waiting to see how much I missed it by, but this is really disheartening. I have a question that I am trying to do some due diligence to see if I have a leg to stand on.

One of my Evals on my Worksheet has the RSCA set at 3.70 which is what the PSR is saying too. My ITA was 3.71. Meaning I get no extra points for that Eval. When I look at the Eval in BLK 43, the command input the RSCA as 3.63. That would give me more towards the FMS. 

Does anyone know why there would be a discrepancy between what Admin placed in BLK 43 vice what was put in my PSR? Also, is there a way to verify the RSCA of a Reporting Senior at the time my Eval was signed?

  • Like 1
Tony

Tony

Posted
  • Author
Posted

In the Chief's area I have NAVADMIN 080/23 which lists the AD and RC timelines that people keep asking for. Also posted are the precepts for future use which has some good gouge that I have not seen in (very) past Precepts.  👍

 

Tony

Tony

Posted
  • Author
Posted
48 minutes ago, ChristianSubmariner said:

What gouge specifically? 

I don't know when they started providing more info and again mind you that I haven't looked at the precepts in a long time but the below looks more detailed than from what I have seen in the past.

6. Area Tours
7. Record Review 
8. Adverse Information

Otherwise, again from way back, the biggest complaint was that the precepts were useless.

ChristianSubmariner Explorer

ChristianSubmariner

Posted
Posted
On 4/7/2023 at 10:56 PM, OG Ron C said:

Yes, I’m really excited for this year. REALLY HOPEFULLY THAT THIS IS MY YEAR!!! 6 Time LET’S GO!!

Good luck and hope you make it! If I make it great, if not still great, retire in a few years and ready for change. 

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 🧧 Activity Stream

    1. 0

      The US Navy is leaving the volatile Middle East without an aircraft carrier again, even as fighting continues

      The US Navy is again without an aircraft carrier in the Middle East; it's the second time in the past year that it has lacked this capability despite the fighting still going on in the region. A US official confirmed to Business Insider on Tuesday that the Navy's sole carrier in the Middle East, USS Abraham Lincoln, left the region over the weekend after several months of operations there.
      Tony in Conflict
    2. 0

      Navy Shutters Premier East Coast Substance Abuse Program Amid Staffing Shortages

      The Navy has suspended operation of its residential substance abuse treatment program at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Virginia, as a result of staffing shortages that affected the quality of care. The service closed the program, considered the Navy's top rehab center on the East Coast, in September, officials confirmed this month. All patients were sent to or are being referred to other Defense Department residential programs or the Tricare network, NMCP Public Affairs Officer Christina Johnson said.
      Tony in Mental Health
    3. 0

      FY-26 NAVY REAR ADMIRAL LINE AND STAFF CORPS SELECTIONS

      CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED// ROUTINE R 191408Z NOV 24 MID120001560579U FM SECNAV WASHINGTON DC TO ALNAV INFO SECNAV WASHINGTON DC CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS ALNAV 091/24 MSGID/GENADMIN/SECNAV WASHINGTON DC/-/NOV// SUBJ/FY-26 NAVY REAR ADMIRAL LINE AND STAFF CORPS SELECTIONS// RMKS/1. The President of the United States has approved the reports of the selection boards which recommend the following officers in the line and staff corps on the active-duty list for promotion to the permanent grade of Rear Admiral. 2. Frocking to Rear Admiral is not authorized except on an individual basis by the Secretary of Defense. Alexander, Christopher D. Andros, Bradley J. Bailey, Sean R. Bennett, Brian H. Cruz, Adan G. Dougherty, John E. IV Henderschedt, Thomas M. Kijek, Christopher A. McCoy, Max G. Jr Moninger, Thomas P. Muckian, Martin J. Newkirk, Gregory D. Rucker, Jonathan E. Schafer, Mark A. Tilbrook, Nicholas R. Williams, Douglas L. Wirth, Robert E. Wosje, Michael S. 3. These nominations will ensure the Navy is equipped with capable senior leaders to employ, generate, and design the Fleet for combat operations, recognizing that the continued preeminence of U.S. naval power is inextricably linked to the ability to successfully change by advancing our culture. To do so, officers with proven sustained superior performance in command leadership positions in difficult and challenging assignments, including those in the diplomatic/foreign service arena were chosen. 4. The Board sought innovative and bold leaders who are ready to sustain the Get Real, Get Better movement by role-modeling GRGB leadership behaviors and problem solving. These officers are their own toughest critic, think creatively, challenge assumptions, and take well-calculated risks to maximize effectiveness. The Board selected those officers with superior leadership skills that may be further developed in a variety of assignments across the Navy without regard to community, platform, or career paths to serve as the future leaders of the Navy. 5. The convening orders and precepts for both boards may be found on the MyNavy HR website at the following link: https://www.mynavyhr.navy.mil/Career-Management/Boards/Flag/Precepts/. 6. Released by Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the Navy.// BT #0001 NNNN CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED//
      Tony in Navy Officer
×
×
  • Create New...
Forum Home
www.NavyAdvancement.com
Boots | Navy Patches
Serving enlisted, veterans, spouses & family