Tony

he swings by once in a while and adds his 2 cents

Great idea

Generally how it works: 7-17-2015 (Someone here knows the date; Yep, OSC(SW) knew it! ) - Board Adjourns ?-?-2015 - CNP Callout 7-27-2015 - Triad notification (http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=90350) 8-05-2015, 11:00AM - Release to Triad 8-06-2015, 11:00AM - Public release via Navadmin, and viewable to the rest of Sailors in Bol.

Yeah I was looking at your other post, pretty much on the nose...

wow

Navy News just edited to say 5 instead of 4. On a Wednesday New Chiefs' Names to be Release Next Week

How about you read the guidelines. And it's in the Navy news. http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=90350

Awesome! Thanks for the quick post! WASHINGTON (NNS) -- Names of Sailors selected to advance to chief petty officer by the fiscal year 2016 E-7 selection board are scheduled to be posted to commands' BUPERS Online (BOL) accounts Wednesday, Aug. 5, with public release via NAVADMIN Thursday, Aug. 6 at 11:00 a.m. eastern time. Approximately 4,100 quotas were announced in June with an overall advancement opportunity of 23.64 percent for this cycle, just a .45 point drop from last cycle and above the 10-year average of 21.94 percent. The selection board is not required to fill all quotas; only the best and most fully qualified candidates are selected for advancement to chief. Because the Navy advances to vacancies, opportunity varies by rating, though advancement planners work to smooth overall opportunity across cycles.

Now that is the Triad notice we were discussing a few pages back. So that was released July 27 and Triad will get their access August 4. About 8 days.

WASHINGTON (NNS) -- Names of Sailors selected to advance to chief petty officer by the fiscal year 2016 E-7 selection board are scheduled to be posted to commands' BUPERS Online (BOL) accounts Wednesday, Aug. 5, with public release via NAVADMIN Thursday, Aug. 6 at 11:00 a.m. eastern time. Approximately 4,100 quotas were announced in June with an overall advancement opportunity of 23.64 percent for this cycle, just a .45 point drop from last cycle and above the 10-year average of 21.94 percent. The selection board is not required to fill all quotas; only the best and most fully qualified candidates are selected for advancement to chief. Because the Navy advances to vacancies, opportunity varies by rating, though advancement planners work to smooth overall opportunity across cycles.

See, I told you you are in the wrong place...

Yes, really... You are...

Well you're in the wrong place then

UNCLASSIFIED// ROUTINE R 241631Z JUL 15 FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 172/15 MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/JUL// SUBJ/FY-16 SENIOR ENLISTED CONTINUATION BOARD - PERFORMANCE-BASED BOARD FOR CONTINUATION OF SENIOR ENLISTED (ACTIVE/RESERVE) PERSONNEL WITH GREATER THAN 19 YEARS OF SERVICE// REF/A/MSG/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/151951ZAPR15// AMPN/REF A IS NAVADMIN 088/15 FY-16 SENIOR ENLISTED CONTINUATION BOARD - PERFORMANCE-BASED BOARD FOR CONTINUATION OF SENIOR ENLISTED (ACTIVE/RESERVE) PERSONNEL WITH GREATER THAN 19 YEARS OF SERVICE.// RMKS/1. Reference (a) announced the convening of the Senior Enlisted Continuation Board (SECB) on 3 August 2015. The board convening date has been adjusted to 7 December 2015. 2. All eligibility requirements contained in reference (a) remain in effect. 3. The deadline for submitting letters to the board (LTB) has been adjusted to 16 November 2015. All LTBs currently received by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) Customer Service Center (CSC) will be presented to the board. Senior chief petty officer and chief petty officer September 2015 periodic evaluations are expected to be either in the members Official Military Personnel File or submitted by the member via a LTB. For LTB submission procedures and guidance visit http://www.npc.navy.mil/bupers- npc/boards/activedutyenlisted/ pages/generalinformation.aspx. 4. Point of contact for SECB execution and retirement programs is the NPC CSC at uasknpc(at)navy.mil or 1-866-U-ASK-NPC (1(866)827-5672). 5. This NAVADMIN will remain in effect until superseded or cancelled. 6. Released by Vice Admiral W. F. Moran, N1.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

Thank you and welcome to the forum.

Yep. too much stuff to take care of and the brain fries.

I'll fix it. Unfortunately, from the past, small cuss words here turn into some very nasty stuff that I don't want to remember. That's why I have this in place...

Welcome!

Somehow he wanted to hook up his shipmates without the recognition. We've also had the classified version released on the forum about three times. It's painful that the results are nowhere else but I have to delete the copy. I don't even save it. It's been sailors wanting to help their shipmates but don't realize they can't do that.

I remember one guy many years ago who made an account only to announce when the results would be released (e4 - e6). Somehow or another he new exactly 24 hrs in advance. Every single time he'd email and say "TONY I FORGOT MY PASSWORD, CAN YOU GET ME IN!!". And he would never tell me why either. So I'd get him set up and he'd announce - RESULTS IN 24 HRS!!! And he'd leave, never stick around...

TrueThat!!! I have an excuse dag nabb it!!

Actually Triad is brand new so there wasn't a reinstatement. It was message traffic release to the commands, then they loosened the strings and released it here and there, then they implemented the Triad release with the 24hr wait period. In that 2011 time frame and before, that's when this forum got the results sooner than possible.

Go figure, the poll I set up on that very topic. Yep, Alzheimer... Now if I remember correctly (and obviously not taking it as gospel) there was a few months gap before I did that poll. But I think (never mind)

Yeah, so we're looking at the 2014 time frame? (Hey, I guess that Alzheimer's is actually setting in... )

Agree with what you all are saying - now I'm confused BUT the e4 - e6 would explain alot about the multiple cycles of this happening. What I do remember the most were the complaints, and they were legit.