Tony

Cycle 110 E-4 to E-6 SELRES Results

ROUTINE R 011634Z JUN 22 MID200001761825U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 127/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/JUN// SUBJ/DETAILING MARKETPLACE ASSIGNMENT POLICY PHASE I UPDATE// REF/A/MSG/CNO WASHINGTON DC/091538ZDEC21// REF/B/MSG/CNO WASHINGTON DC/230112ZAUG08// REF/C/MSG/CNO WASHINGTON DC/022009ZDEC19// NARR/REF A IS NAVADMIN 280/21, DETAILING MARKETPLACE ASSIGNMENT POLICY (DMAP). REF B IS NAVADMIN 234/08, SEA SHORE FLOW ENLISTED CAREER PATHS. REF C IS NAVADMIN 274/19, SEA SHORE FLOW ENLISTED CAREER PATHS UPDATE. RMKS/1. This NAVADMIN provides additional details and guidance regarding Detailing Marketplace Assignment Policy (DMAP) to ensure more Sailors and commands can benefit. a. In addition to afloat commands benefitting from experienced and motivated Sailors staying at sea, DMAP plank owners selected in the recent inaugural MyNavy Assignment (MNA) cycle will: (1) Receive an increase in pay through advancement from E4 to E5, if not already E5. (2) Collect a monthly monetary incentive, Detailing Marketplace Incentive Pay (DMIP), in addition to collecting sea pay and sea pay premium. (3) Remain in the same homeport on the ship or squadron where they trained as an Apprentice Sailor if selected for Command Advance to Position (CA2P). (4) Earn an advantage in MNA for a follow-on shore tour assignment after completing their journeyman (E5) sea tour. b. Sailors within the DMAP Phase I ratings (ABF, ABH, CS and GSM) should anticipate maximum flexibility in determining who meets the requirements of reference (a) and minimum friction in accepting a DMAP plus- three sea tour. The MyNavy HR team will interpret every requirement within all DMAP policy guidance to ensure the greatest possible participation. 2. Projected Rotation Date (PRD) Adjustments. Effective immediately, Enlisted Distribution Division (PERS-40) will adjust PRDs to a 48-month tour for all E5 and E5 eligible Sailors within the DMAP Phase I ratings who are serving in their initial Continental United States (CONUS) sea tour. This replaces paragraph 4.f of reference (a) and alleviates the administrative burden on activities by no longer requiring submission of Electronic Personnel Action Request (NAVPERS 1306/7) for DMAP Sailors. 3. PRD Assignments for New Accession Sailors. Effective immediately, all CONUS sea duty accession orders for Sailors in the DMAP Phase I ratings will be written for an initial 48-month sea tour. Sailors who do not qualify for a journeyman (E5) sea tour after serving 3 years on their first sea tour will have their PRDs adjusted to align with their soft end of active obligated service. This replaces paragraph 4.b in reference (a) and aligns with the DMAP four- plus-three construct. 4. CA2P. To nominate a Sailor for CA2P, activities must submit a member realignment request (MRR) in MNA prior to or within the first 3 weeks of the next MNA cycle (i.e., prior to the end of the upcoming MNA scrub phase). PERS-40 will validate that the activity has a current or projected E5 funded billet vacancy and then Sailors will be ranked based on their most recent E5 examination final multiple score. If DMAP quotas are available (see paragraph 6), Sailors will: a. Be approved for CA2P. b. Be realigned to a valid E5 billet. c. Have their PRD extended for a 3 year journeyman (E5) tour or a 7 year total initial sea tour (whichever is later). d. Be frocked to E5 upon completion of agreement to obligate additional service as described above. e. Be advanced to E5 upon completion of required training and placement into a valid E5 billet. (1) Commands can frock Sailors to E5 as soon as CA2P approval is received and the Sailor has obligated service through their extended PRD, either through reenlistment or extension of enlistment. (2) Sailors will advance to E5 and begin receiving E5 pay upon filling the E5 billet and will receive DMIP for the last three years on sea duty. Transaction support centers will effect advancement to E5 upon receiving the required key supporting documents. (3) Instructions on how to submit an MRR, as well as a general list of eligibility requirements, can be found on the Detailing Marketplace webpage of the MyNavy HR website at: https://www.mynavyhr.navy.mil/Career-Management/Detailing/Enlisted/Detailing- Marketplace/. (4) The full MNA schedule is available on the detailing marketplace webpage listed above. The first 3 weeks of the upcoming MNA cycles (i.e., the scrub phase) are provided below: 6 - 24 June 2022 8 - 28 August 2022 3 - 21 October 2022 5 - 22 December 2022 (5) MNA does not allow activities to submit an MRR for Sailors who are within their order negotiation window (i.e., within 12 months of their PRD). When operational requirements or PRD adjustments described in paragraph 2 above prevent MRR submissions prior to the order negotiation window, activities can submit CA2P nominations via email to DMAP.fct(at)navy.mil. If the request is approved, actions will be executed in alignment with paragraph 4. 5. Sailors on Second Sea Tour. E5 eligible Sailors (i.e., E4 Sailors who have passed the most recent E5 Navy wide advancement exam) and E5 Sailors in a DMAP Phase I rating who are on their second sea tour are eligible for DMAP incentives in return for a 3 year extension to the prescribed sea tour length listed in references (b) and (c). This provides additional advancement opportunities to E5 eligible Sailors prior to hitting E4 high year tenure. It also provides additional geographic stability options for Sailors desiring to remain in their current homeport. This is an expansion of eligibility described in paragraphs 1 and 4 of reference (a). 6. DMAP Quotas. The number of DMAP quotas available (i.e., the number of Sailors that can be on a plus-three sea tour) for each Phase I rating depends on the number of sea and shore duty billets the rating needs to fill. DMAP intends to fill sea duty billets that would remain unmanned under sea shore flow (SSF). MyNavy HR intends to phase in the number of Sailors on a plus- three journeyman (E5) sea tour across several years to ensure a smooth transition from SSF to DMAP, provide opportunity fairness and avoid a large movement of Sailors from sea to shore at the end of their plus-three journeyman (E5) sea tour. 7. Additional Considerations. DMAP represents a major paradigm shift in how the Navy mans the Fleet. As such, MyNavy HR intends to collect data and feedback to help inform future adjustments to DMAP. Sailor and command flexibility and feedback remain key enablers to ensuring success. To that end, the following considerations are provided: a. Tour Extensions. The transition from SSF to DMAP may require PERS-40 to extend Sailors in their current shore duty assignment to ensure proper manning of critical shore activities and to maximize the alignment between Sailor and billet rating and paygrade. b. C-School Quota Management. DMAP Sailors approved for CA2P or A2P who require training prior to filling a journeyman (E5) sea duty billet will be given priority placement in the appropriate C- school to the maximum extent practicable. c. Pulse Surveys. MyNavy HR intends to send pulse surveys to DMAP Phase I Sailors who negotiated for orders after each MNA cycle. This gives Sailors the opportunity to provide direct feedback that will be used in future policy development. d. Command Triad Feedback. Command triads are encouraged to provide feedback, lessons learned and suggested improvements through their immediate superior in command and type commanders. 8. Points of Contact a. For specific rate/rating/Navy enlisted classification questions and concerns, Sailors should contact their respective community manager or detailer. b. For general career information, including questions about DMIP, Advance to Position and CA2P, contact MyNavy Career Center contact center at 833-330-MNCC (6622) or askmncc(at)navy.mil. c. For DMAP questions, contact the MyNavy HR DMAP team at DMAP.fct(at)navy.mil. 9. This message will remain in effect until superseded or canceled. 10. Released by Vice Admiral John B. Nowell, Jr, N1.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

ROUTINE R 311653Z MAY 22 MID200001758886U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 125/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/MAY// SUBJ/FY-24 ACTIVE-DUTY LIMITED DUTY OFFICER AND CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER IN-SERVICE PROCUREMENT BOARD// REF/A/DOC/OPNAV/14DEC09// REF/B/MSG/CNO WASHINGTON DC/101548ZJUN19// REF/C/MSG/CNO WASHINGTON DC/251736ZJAN18// REF/D/DOC/OPNAV/17JAN19// REF/E/MSG/CNO WASHINGTON DC/041710ZJUN18// REF/F/DOC/BUPERS/19SEP18// NARR/REF A IS OPNAVINST 1420.1B, ENLISTED TO OFFICER COMMISSIONING PROGRAMS APPLICATION ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL. REF B IS NAVADMIN 128/19, OFF-RAMP GUIDANCE FOR ACTIVE COMPONENT SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS DESIGNATOR 6290 LIMITED DUTY OFFICERS. REF C IS NAVADMIN 014/18, UPDATED OFF-RAMP GUIDANCE FOR ACTIVE AND RESERVE COMPONENT INFORMATION WARFARE AND SUPPLY CORPS LIMITED DUTY OFFICERS. REF D IS OPNAVINST 1210.5B, LATERAL TRANSFER AND REDESIGNATION OF ACTIVE COMPONENT OFFICERS IN THE NAVY. REF E IS NAVADMIN 140/18, MODIFICATION OF THE NAVY CYBER WARRANT OFFICER PROGRAM. REF F IS BUPERSINST 1430.16G, ADVANCEMENT MANUAL FOR ENLISTED PERSONNEL OF THE U.S. NAVY AND U.S. NAVY RESERVE.// RMKS/1. This NAVADMIN announces solicitation of applications from highly qualified and motivated E-6 through E-9 Active-Duty (AD) and Training and Administration of the Reserves (TAR) personnel for the Fiscal Year 2024 (FY) 2024 Limited Duty Officer (LDO) and Chief Warrant Officer (CWO) programs, and E-5 and above for the FY-24 AD Warrant Officer (WO1) program. Where conflicts with reference (a) exist, this NAVADMIN takes precedence. 2. For the most current information concerning open designator codes, visit https://www.mnp.navy.mil/group/career-planning/commissioning-programs, click the *Limited Duty Officer & Chief Warrant Officer In-Service Procurement Board* link and scroll down to the *Active-Duty LDO/CWO In-Service Procurement Board click here* link, then select Applicant Information link, then select current LDO and CWO designators link. 3. Eligibility. All applicants for the LDO, CWO and WO1 programs must have a security clearance prior to commissioning, must be able to complete operational duty screening and must be worldwide assignable. Updated policy guidance to reference (a): a. All time-in-service (TIS) and time-in-grade (TIG) requirements for the FY-24 Active-Duty LDO and CWO In-Service Procurement Board (ISPB) will be computed to 1 October 2023. b. TIS and TIG requirements are: (1) LDO: 8-14 years TIS and 1 year TIG for E-6 and above. TIS waivers will be considered up to 180 days beyond 14 years for LDO applicants. No further exceptions will be entertained. (2) Applicants for LDO off-ramp designators (629X and 651X) may apply with up to 15 years of service and must understand designator specific off- ramp requirements and procedures defined in references (b) through (d). TIS waivers will not be considered or exceptions granted for off-ramp designators. (3) Nuclear Power LDO (620X) applicants may apply with up to 16 years of service. TIS waivers will not be considered or exceptions granted. (4) CWO3: 14 to 22 years TIS and one day TIG as an E-9 as of 2 January 2023. TIS waivers will be considered up to 180 days beyond 22 years for CWO3 applicants. No further exceptions will be entertained. (5) CWO2: 14 to 20 years TIS for E-6 selected for E-7, E-7 and E-8 (includes frocked E-9s). TIS waivers will be considered up to 180 days beyond 20 years for CWO applicants. No further exceptions will be entertained. (6) Due to the FY-23 Enlisted Selection Board schedule for Active E- 7, First Class Petty Officers awaiting Chief Petty Officer (CPO) results to apply for CWO are encouraged to apply and submit their application by the 1 October 2022 deadline with the following guidelines: (a) Commands are directed to proceed with the application process for these applicants as outlined in this NAVADMIN. (b) First Class Petty Officers awaiting CPO selection results must add the following statement at the top of the Commanding Officers endorsement: *Member is awaiting CPO results.* PERS-803 will set aside these applications until CPO results are announced. (c) First Class Petty Officer evaluations due 15 November 2022 will be submitted as an addendum per guidelines of this NAVADMIN. If selected for CPO and the pinning date is after receiving a 15 November 2022 periodic First Class evaluation, the close-out eval is not required to be submitted as an addendum. Submit the close-out evaluation as an addendum if a periodic First Class evaluation was not received. Once all of the CPO results are announced, PERS-803 will integrate or remove those records/applications accordingly. (7) WO1 (784X only): 6 to 14 years TIS for E-5 and above. TIS waivers will not be considered or exceptions granted. Cyber Warrant Officer WO1 (784X) applicants refer to eligibility requirements listed in reference (e). c. To support career progression models and maximize the return on investment for the Navy, TIS waivers must be submitted to ldocwoocm.fct(at)navy.mil before 15 July 2022 for adjudication. Approved waivers must be submitted with the application. d. Intelligence CWO (783X) applicants will be considered for selection into one of three Core Competency Areas (CCA): CI/HUMINT, GEOINT/Targeting or OPINTEL. In order to apply, applicants must request a primary CCA and those holding qualifying Navy Enlisted Classification (NEC) in more than one field may request a secondary CCA (i.e., 783X CI/HUMINT / 783X OPINTEL). e. First Class Petty Officers serving in congressionally designated combat zones and approved contingency operations areas that meet the conditions of reference (f) are also eligible for LDO if all other eligibility requirements are met. f. Due to ongoing rating mergers or realignments, eligible Sailors are encouraged to apply for the designator for which they have extensive documented technical expertise and leadership experience in their enlisted service records, regardless of current rating. However, special attention should be given to the guidance in chapter 7, subparagraph 9c of reference (a) and discrete requirements. g. Applicants for designators outlined in reference (a) that have color perception requirements shall have test results documented as a telephone consult in Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application within the past 12 months, and provide hard copy or have test results documented on standard form- 600 and submitted with application. h. Applicants must maintain eligibility throughout the selection and promotion process. Applicants who are deemed ineligible after submitting an application must be declared ineligible by their current Commanding Officer/Officer in Charge (CO/OIC). A sample removal of recommendation format is located at https://www.mnp.navy.mil/group/career-planning/commissioning-programs. Click through the following path of *Limited Duty Officer & Chief Warrant Officer In-Service Procurement Board* link, then *Active-Duty LDO/CWO In-Service Procurement Board click here* link, then select Applicant Information, then select LDO and CWO In- Service Procurement Board to download the form (See Sample Letter of Abeyance or Removal of Recommendation). Nuclear Power LDO (620X) applicants who are deemed ineligible must be declared ineligible by their current CO via letter to the Nuclear Propulsion Program Manager (OPNAV N133). 4. Appraisal Boards. (Not required for Nuclear Power LDO 620X) Active duty interview appraisal boards will be coordinated and approved by the CO/OIC and consist of three AD Naval Officers (LDOs or CWOs preferred). The names of the approved appraisal board members must be included in the CO/OIC endorsement. Every effort (including teleconference media) should be made to ensure the senior board member is from the LDO or CWO designator family for which the applicant is applying. a. LDO applicants - it is highly recommended that the senior member of the interview panel for applicants applying for LDO be an in-designator commander (CDR) or above. If not available, a LDO CDR or above in another designator can serve in this capacity with at least one board member from the designator family. Officers who were CDR or Captain (CAPT) LDOs that converted to another designator via the Without Board Action (WOBA) process can serve as the senior member. In communities where there are no longer senior LDOs within the community, a CDR or CAPT from the parent community can act as the senior board member, (e.g., a Supply Corps (3100) CDR or CAPT for Supply (651X)) applicants. b. CWO applicants - it is highly recommended that the senior member of the interview panel for applicants applying for CWO be an in-designator CWO5. If not available, a LCDR (LDO preferred) or above can serve in this capacity with at least one board member from the in-designator or designator family (CWO preferred). c. Minimum ranks requirements for board members are Lieutenant or CWO3. d. Only three interview appraisals may be submitted for each applicant. e. Board member preparation for applicant appraisal is an important part of the board process. Review of the application, review of discrete requirements for the applicant designator, having well thought out questions on technical expertise, leadership and knowledge of the designator for which the candidate is applying, to include future career path if selected, are all great examples of board member preparation. f. The technical ability and potential blocks on the interview appraisal sheet must be marked for LDO and CWO candidates. g. Each appraisal shall contain the names of all three panel members. Only the current version of the interviewer appraisal sheet will be accepted. Interviewer appraisal sheet is located at https://www.mnp.navy.mil/group/career-planning/commissioning-programs. Click through the following path of *Limited Duty Officer & Chief Warrant Officer In-Service Procurement Board* link, then *Active-Duty LDO/CWO In-Service Procurement Board click here* link, then select Applicant Information, then select LDO and CWO In- Service Procurement Board to download the form. 5. Application Submission. Communication to the board (application, addendums, etc.) should originate from the applicant via their CO. However, it is acceptable for the command to submit an applicant’s package on his or her behalf, provided that the package has been endorsed by the CO and the applicant has been provided a copy of their entire package prior to submission. Information received that is not under the cover letter of the applicant (e.g., third party correspondence) and endorsed by the command, or not received by the MyNavy Career Center (MNCC) by the established deadline(s) will not be presented to the board. a. All applications must include a command endorsed LDO/CWO eligibility checklist. b. Each applicant and CO/OIC must ensure applications/addendums are complete and accurate. Incomplete applications could result in non-selection. Applications must be signed by the CO/OIC of the applicant or the *Acting* CO/OIC. Addendums can be signed *By direction* if the CO or OIC is unavailable. c. All applicants must possess a security clearance prior to commission. Refer to reference (a), (chapters 2 and 7) for security clearance information, program overview and eligibility criteria. d. CO/OIC endorsements must contain the following statement: *Applicant meets all requirements outlined in OPNAVINST 1420.1B, NAVADMIN XXX/22, the physical fitness standards of OPNAVINST 6110.1J, and is worldwide assignable.* The endorsement must clearly identify the command, it must identify the members of the interview panel, must be signed by the CO/OIC and include the CO/OICs command point of contact information. A CO/OIC ranking is no longer required, or desired. e. Applicants must ensure a copy of their most recent periodic evaluation is included in the application or provided via addendum for board review and continuity if it is not already in Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). f. Applicants are not required to include an obligatory service statement to remain on active duty. g. Applicants currently serving in an Individual Augmentation Manpower Management, Global Support Assignment or Overseas Contingency Operations Support Assignment may have their application endorsed by the field commander. Field commanders must obtain parent command endorsement prior to submission. A sample format is located at https://www.mnp.navy.mil/group/career-planning/commissioning-programs. Click through the following path of *Limited Duty Officer & Chief Warrant Officer In-Service Procurement Board* link, then *Active-Duty LDO/CWO In-Service Procurement Board click here* link, then select Applicant Information, then select LDO and CWO In-Service Procurement Board to download the form (See Sample Addendum Letter). h. Applicants must submit sequentially numbered enclosures to the application/addendum, annotated on the bottom right corner of each page with the last name and full social security number of the applicant in the top right corner. Addendums must include a command endorsement. The FY-24 AD LDO and CWO ISPB board number is 24181. The FY-24 Active-Duty Nuclear LDO ISPB board number is 24182. i. Applications must be received by MNCC no later than 1 October 2022. Submit applications via e-mail to cscselboard(at)navy.mil. E-mails must be encrypted using a military e-mail account to protect personally identifiable information (PII). Applicants who are unable to submit applications as outlined above due to current operational locations may mail their application via USPS to the address listed below. When mailing PII, individuals must use DD Form 2923 Privacy Act Data Cover Sheet and double wrap the package. DD Form 2923 may be accessed by using the following Web address: https://www.disa.mil/-/media/files/DISA/about/Privacy-Office/dd2923.pdf. The inner package must be labeled with the privacy warning *CUI - PRIVACY SENSITIVE Any misuse or unauthorized disclosure may result in both civil and criminal penalties* and use a tracking feature. Correspondence mailed via USPS must use the following address: Navy Personnel Command Customer Service Center (BUPERS-074) President, FY-24 Active Duty LDO/CWO In-service Procurement Board FY-24181 5720 Integrity Drive Millington TN 38055 (j) Department of Defense Secure Access File Exchange (DoD SAFE) and Electronic Submission of Selection Board (ESSBD) via BUPERS Online are not supported or authorized means to submit applications or addendums. k. Mailed applications must be postmarked no later than 1 October 2022. Addendums to applications must be received no later than 15 December 2022. 6. Nuclear Power LDO (620X) applications must be sent to the pers- 422b_desk.fct(at)navy.mil inbox. Applications should be scanned and submitted via encrypted email. Applicants who are unable to submit applications as outlined due to operational commitments must contact the selection board sponsor at nukeldo(at)navy.mil for alternate delivery methods. Nuclear Power LDO (620X) applicants will submit in addition to their application: a. Information applicants consider pertinent to their application not contained in their OMPF. b. Nuclear Power LDO (620X) E-6 applicants must submit a copy of their E-7 examination profile sheet as enclosure (2) to their application. c. Engineering Watch Supervisor or Propulsion Plant Watch Supervisor qualification as documented by NEC N33Z is required to apply for Nuclear Power LDO (620X). d. Sailors selected for Nuclear Power LDO (620X) will require a separate technical interview at Naval Reactors to receive a commission. Sailors who do not successfully complete a final technical interview will maintain their enlisted status and will not be commissioned. Additionally, these Sailors are ineligible to submit future applications to the Nuclear Power LDO (620X) program. Technical interviews will be scheduled by Nuclear placement and Assignments (PERS-422) and selectees notified via separate correspondence. 7. Application/Addendum Due Dates. All non-nuclear power applications must be received by MNCC no later than 1 October 2022. Routine addendums to applications, including evaluations and awards, must be received no later than 15 December 2022. Submit applications via e-mail to cscselboard(at)navy.mil. The time and date (Central Standard Time) received by MNCC inbox is the time and date used for deadline verification. Applications and addendums received after the designated due dates will not be presented to the board. Nuclear Power LDO (620X) applications must be received by pers-422b_desk.fct(at)navy.mil no later than 1 October 2022. All Nuclear Power LDO addendums to applications, including 15 September 2022 CPO and 15 November 2022 First Class evaluations, if not already included in the OMPF, must be received (or postmarked) no later than 15 December 2022. The time and date (central standard time) received in the pers-422b_desk.fct(at)navy.mil inbox is the time and date used for deadline verification. 8. Board Convene Dates. The FY-24 Active-Duty LDO and CWO ISPB and FY-24 Active-Duty Nuclear Power LDO ISPB will convene at dates to be determined in January 2023 and February 2023. For the most current board dates, visit MNP at https://www.mnp.navy.mil/group/advancement-and-promotion/active- duty-enlisted and select *Selection Board Schedule* then *FY-24 board schedule* when available. 9. For additional information, current application and eligibility checklist, visit the Administrative Boards Branch (PERS-803) website at https://www.mnp.navy.mil/group/career-planning/commissioning- programs. Click through the following path of *Limited Duty Officer & Chief Warrant Officer In-Service Procurement Board* link, then *Active-Duty LDO/CWO In-Service Procurement Board click here*, then select Applicant Information, then select LDO and CWO In-Service Procurement Board. This site also contains guidance such as how to monitor receipt of application or addendum, status after PERS-803 review and how to reconcile application errors via addendum if items or corrections are required for completeness or eligibility. 10. Points of contact: a. For application/addendum and eligibility questions contact the ISP Board Sponsor at (901) 874-3170/DSN 882, or via e-mail at npc_ldo-cwo_selbd.fct(at)navy.mil. b. For general LDO/CWO career path and policy questions contact the LDO/CWO Officer Community Managers at (901) 874-2464/DSN 882, or via email at ldocwoocm.fct(at)navy.mil. c. For nuclear-trained Sailor application and eligibility questions, contact the LDO/CWO Nuclear Officer Detailer, at (901) 874-3938/DSN 882, or via e-mail at nukeldo(at)navy.mil. 11. This NAVADMIN will remain in effect until superseded or 30 September 2023, whichever comes first. 12. Released by Vice Admiral John B. Nowell, Jr, N1.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED//

A Florida Veterans Affairs hospital refused treatment for a veteran dying of heart failure because first responders could not prove his military service, a clear violation of federal law, according to a new report released by a department watchdog Tuesday. The incident, which occurred at the Malcom Randall VA Medical Center in Gainesville in summer 2020, was not the first failure by emergency medical staff there to provide care to individuals facing critical medical crises. Staff from the VA Inspector General’s Office said without policy and staffing changes, it may not be the last.

NEWPORT, R.I. (NNS) – Commander, Naval Legal Service Command (NLSC), Rear Adm. David G. Wilson, relieved Capt. Amy Larson as the commanding officer and LtCol Bret Swaim as the executive officer of Naval Justice School (NJS) on May 31 due to a loss of confidence in their ability to command. Capt. Mark Klein, deputy commander of NLSC, is assigned as the interim commanding officer, as well as the Judge Advocate General’s special assistant for training. Cmdr. Abigail Myers, NJS operations officer, is assigned as the acting executive officer while NLSC works with the Marine Corps to identify a permanent relief. Larson and Swaim were relieved following an assessment of the current NJS climate. Neither officer was involved in misconduct. Their relief will not impact the NJS mission or execution of its training schedule. Larson has served as NJS commanding officer, and also as the Judge Advocate General’s special assistant for training, since Sept. 10, 2021. Swaim has served in various roles at NJS since the summer of 2020. Larson has been temporarily reassigned to NLSC headquarters. Swaim’s new assignment has not yet been named.

The Navy unveiled promotion quotas for E-4, E-5, and E-6 sailors in the Selected Reserve — which give these sailors a greater chance of being promoted than last year. Seamen looking to move up to petty officer third class are guaranteed they will get one of the 886 E-4 spots if they pass their advancement exam and meet other requirements. There is a 100% advancement opportunity, the same as last year.

Navy Mandates CWP Black Rank Tab Wear -- Here are the details

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 271536Z MAY 22 MID200001752845U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 124/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/MAY// SUBJ/NAVY UNIFORM AND GROOMING POLICY UPDATE// REF/A/DOC/COMNAVPERSCOM/23AUG21// AMPN/REF A IS NAVPERS 15665J, U.S. NAVY UNIFORM REGULATIONS.// RMKS/1. This NAVADMIN announces an update to several uniform and grooming policies. Navy uniform policy updates directly support Sailor 2025 objectives to attract and retain the very best Sailors by finding greater flexibility in our policies and practices, including uniforms. 2. Navy Uniform Regulations apply to all Sailors equally, regardless of their rank, grade, ethnicity, position held or community assigned. Any difference between male and female grooming policies recognizes the differences between the genders. Navy uniform policy updates are the result of Fleet feedback, uniform working group discussions, command sponsored requests and direction from Navy leadership. 3. The following uniform and grooming policy changes are effective as stated: a. Female Hosiery. Effective immediately, wearing hosiery with slacks or skirts is optional vice mandatory for female Sailors when wearing pumps or flats footwear. When hosiery is not worn, shoe liners or no-show socks are required to be worn for hygienic purposes and to avoid abrasions or blisters caused by direct contact and rubbing between the foot and shoe. b. Female Officer/Chief Petty Officer (CPO) Summer White Uniform. Effective immediately, the female officer/CPO summer white uniform belted slacks are re-designated as a basic component of both summer white and service dress white uniforms. This policy change facilitates use of the same slacks for either uniform. c. Female Officer/CPO Service Dress White Uniform. Effective immediately, the beltless dress white slacks worn with the female officer/CPO Service Dress white uniform is re-designated as an optional vice mandatory component for purchase and wear. d. Rank Insignia Worn on Rank Tabs. Effective 1 October 2022, all Navy Service Members will wear the black cold weather parka (CWP) rank insignia on all uniform components with rank tabs. Uniform components requiring the black rank insignia in addition to the CWP include the Navy working uniform (NWU) type II and III shirts and parkas, black fleece liner and brown fleece liner. Matching pattern NWU type II/III rank insignia will only be worn on the NWU type II/III during tactical training and operations as designated by the applicable commanding officer. e. Retired Male Sailor Uniform Grooming Standards. Effective immediately, retired male Sailors are authorized to have facial hair (beard) when wearing Navy uniforms during authorized ceremonial events. Facial hair must be neatly groomed and be in keeping with a professional appearance. f. NWU Type III Maternity Top. Redesign of the NWU type III maternity top is in progress to include the ability to add shoulder patches to align with the design of standard NWU shirt. The availability of the redesigned maternity top will be announced in a future NAVADMIN. 4. Navy Uniform Regulations are continuously reviewed for policy applicability, accuracy, clarity and comprehension. Feedback and recommendations regarding uniform policy, uniform components and uniform availability are welcomed and can be provided via MyNavy portal at https://www.mnp.navy.mil/, select *Professional Resources*, *U.S. Navy Uniforms* and *Ask The Chiefs.* Feedback can also be provided via the MyNavy UNIFORMS App. 5. Questions regarding this NAVADMIN should be addressed to Mr. Robert B. Carroll, Navy Uniform Matters and Emerging Issues Branch (OPNAV N13X), robert.b.carroll3.civ(at)us.navy.mil, ETCM(SW/AW/EXW) Richard Baumert, Deputy Branch Head, richard.a.baumert2.mil(at)us.navy.mil, or ETC(SW) Ryan P. Cameron, ryan.p.cameron.mil(at)us.navy.mil. 6. Retain this NAVADMIN until policy changes are incorporated in Navy Uniform Regulations, superseded or canceled, whichever occurs first. 7. Released by Vice Admiral John B. Nowell, Jr, N1.// BT #0001 NNNN CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 271442Z MAY 22 MID200001752642U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 123/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/MAY// SUBJ/ENLISTED SUPERVISOR RETENTION PAY POLICY UPDATES// REF/A/LTR/OPNAV/18MAY22/NOTAL// REF/B/LTR/OPNAV/11AUG16/NOTAL// REF/C/MSG/CNO WASHINGTON DC/261832ZMAR20// REF/D/DOC/U.S.C./7SEP62// REF/E/DOC/SECDEF/DODI 1304.31/5NOV20// REF/F/MSG/CNO WASHINGTON DC/032039ZJUN21// REF/G/DOC/DOD/1AUG20// NARR/REF A IS THE CNO (N13) MEMORANDUM, ENLISTED SUPERVISOR RETENTION PAY POLICY MEMORANDUM. REF B IS THE CNO (N13) MEMORANDUM, ENLISTED SUPERVISOR RETENTION PAY POLICY MEMORANDUM. REF C IS NAVADMIN 091/20, ENLISTED SUPERVISOR RETENTION PAY UPDATE. REF D IS TITLE 37 U.S. CODE, PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES. REF E IS DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INSTRUCTION 1304.31, ENLISTED BONUS PROGRAM. REF F IS NAVADMIN 116/21, FY-23 ACTIVE-DUTY LIMITED DUTY OFFICER AND CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER IN-SERVICE PROCUREMENT BOARD. REF G IS THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FMR VOL 7A, MILITARY PAY POLICY - ACTIVE DUTY AND RESERVE PAY.// RMKS/1. This NAVADMIN announces the updated nuclear Enlisted Supervisor Retention Pay (ESRP) policy memorandum, reference (a). This ESRP policy memorandum and NAVADMIN supersede reference (b) and reference (c), respectively, effective 1 August 2022. The ESRP Program provides a retention incentive to senior Navy nuclear- trained enlisted Sailors with highly specialized skills. A detailed program description is outlined in reference (a) and can be found at https://www.mynavyhr.navy.mil/Career-Management/Community- Management/Enlisted/Nuclear/Enlisted-Programs/. The legal authority for ESRP is contained in section 331 of reference (d) and reference (e). Current ESRP requirements limit the program as follows: a. The minimum reenlistment length is 3 years. b. The maximum bonus amount for each year of additional obligated service (AOS) is limited to 30,000 dollars as stated in section 331 of reference (d). The implication of this limit is that to earn a 100,000- dollar bonus the minimum AOS required is 40 months. c. The maximum reenlistment lifetime bonus amount is 360,000 dollars. d. All ESRP payments must be received prior to completion of 28 years of service (YOS). The implication of this limit is that any ESRP installment that would be due after 28 YOS will be paid in the final installment prior to completion of 28 YOS. 2. Notable changes in reference (a) are as follows: a. Zone 2 eligibility is now defined as greater than or equal to 14 years but less than completion of 17 years. b. Zone 3 eligibility is now defined as greater than or equal to 17 years but less than completion of 23 years. c. Provides guidance for ESRP requests to be submitted through the Navy Standard Integrated Personnel System (NSIPS). d. Updates compensation for any term of reenlistment is limited to 30,000 per year of AOS (2,500/month of AOS). e. Updates a service member cannot exceed combined SRB and ESRP payments totaling 360,000 dollars in a career. f. Updates that anniversary payments may not be made after completion of 28 YOS. g. Provides clarity that each reenlistment must obligate service into the next zone. 3. ESRP Award Multiples. Award levels remain the same as previously released in reference (c) and are listed below: a. ESRP Zone 1 and Zone 2 award level (AOS computation stops at completion of 16 YOS for Zone 1 and 18 YOS for Zone 2): Rating PNEC Zone 1 Zone 2 ETNSS N13S 9.5 4.5 EMNSS N14S 8.0 4.5 MMNSS N15S 7.5 4.5 ELTSS N16S 7.5 4.5 ETNSW N23S 7.5 4.5 EMNSW N24S 8.0 4.5 MMNSW N25S 7.5 4.5 ELTSW N26S 6.0 4.5 b. ESRP Zone 3 award level (AOS computation stops at completion of 23 YOS): AOS AOS AOS Rating PNEC 1-24mos 25-36mos 37+mos ETNSS N13S 0.5 1.5 2.5 EMNSS N14S 0.5 1.5 2.5 MMNSS N15S 0.5 1.5 2.5 ELTSS N16S 0.5 1.5 2.5 ETNSW N23S 0.5 1.5 2.5 EMNSW N24S 0.5 1.5 2.5 MMNSW N25S 0.5 1.5 2.5 ELTSW N26S 0.5 1.5 2.5 4. Eligibility. Only Sailors assigned with an active supervisor Navy enlisted classification (NEC) listed in paragraph 3 are eligible to reenlist for ESRP. In addition, Service Members must hold a current security clearance or be in an open status for a new investigation. ESRP requests and anniversary payments for personnel with special category NECs (N59X/N89X) will be held in abeyance pending final resolution. Overall, ESRP eligibility requirements are defined in reference (a). To encourage career progression and provide incentive for continued superior at-sea service, the following supplementary eligibility requirements remain in place for each ESRP zone: a. ESRP Zone 1. In addition to the requirements of reference (a), be assigned an active nuclear supervisor NEC (see paragraph 3). b. ESRP Zone 2. In addition to the requirements of reference (a), be a frocked E-7 or in the paygrade of E-7, E-8 or E-9 on the date of the ESRP Zone 2 reenlistment. c. ESRP Zone 3. In addition to the requirements of reference (a): (1) Be a frocked E-8 or in the paygrade of E-8 or E-9 on the date of the ESRP Zone 3 reenlistment and (2) Have successfully previously served as, be currently serving as (on orders) or have been issued and accepted orders as a submarine engineering department master chief, nuclear aircraft carrier (CVN) major division leading chief petty officer, CVN reactor training division officer or CVN reactor department master chief. 5. Application Process. To ensure the approval message is released in a timely manner, ESRP reenlistment requests should be submitted 35 to 120 days in advance of the desired reenlistment date. Exceptions to this policy can be approved by the ESRP program manager on an individual basis. a. ESRP eligible service members must be recommended for reenlistment by their commanding officer. The command may use the checklist (enclosure (l) of reference (a)) to assist in submitting the ESRP request within the NSIPS. b. NSIPS is programmed to accept ESRP reenlistment requests and is the only method of submission. If the command is unable to submit ESRP reenlistment requests due to operational commitments, then the commands immediate superior in command may submit the request via NSIPS. Due to the transition from Officer Personnel Information System Force Management to NSIPS, the ESRP Program Manager can no longer submit a request for a Sailor or command. Entering an ESRP request in NSIPS is similar to that of submitting a SRB request. Other specifics for submitting ESRP requests in NSIPS are stated in reference (a). 6. Officer Programs. ESRP entitlement for Sailors who reenlist after applying for an officer program will be held pending selection results. For limited duty officer, the application deadline is considered the suspense date as published in reference (f) and future announcement messages. For all other commissioning programs, the date on which Nuclear Community Manager (OPNAV N133) approves the conditional release to apply for that program is the date after which additional ESRP entitlements will be held. 7. Recoupment. Repayment policy is governed by section 373 of reference (d), chapter 2 of reference (g) and reference (a), which collectively determines when repayment of the unearned portion of a bonus is required or not required, but left to Secretarial discretion or is prohibited. Section 373 of reference (d), requires repayment with certain exceptions. As a general rule, repayment of any unearned portion of a bonus will be sought. Examples of situations requiring repayment are provided in reference (a). 8. Service Record Entry. An Administrative Remarks (NAVPERS 1070/613) entry acknowledging recoupment policy via NSIPS is required in the record of the Service Member prior to execution of an ESRP reenlistment (examples are provided in enclosure (2) of reference (a)). 9. The point of contact is the ESRP Program Manager located at OPNAV N133 at (703) 604-5502/DSN 664 or via e-mail at nxag_n133d3(at)navy.mil or bullnuke(at)navy.mil. 10. Released by Vice Admiral John B. Nowell, Jr, N1. BT #0001 NNNN CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

The Navy has officially changed the status of 13 Sailors lost when the USS Indianapolis (CA 35) was sunk in 1945 from “Unaccounted for” to “Buried at Sea,” Navy Casualty announced May 27. The change in status is the result of extensive research between Naval History and Heritage Command (NHHC), Navy Casualty Office, the USS Indianapolis Survivors Association, the USS Indianapolis Legacy Organization, and the Chief Rick Stone and Family Charitable Foundation. The announcement helps bring closure to the families of these Sailors who lost their lives at the end of a secret mission which helped end World War II.

SELRES Cycle 110 Quotas SELRES E4 SELRES E5 SELRES E6

The Navy exceeded 1,000 separations due to sailors’ continued refusal to get vaccinated against COVID-19. The service has now approved 1,074 separations for sailors who will not get vaccinated against COVID-19 and do not have a waiver, according to the sea service’s weekly update. The Navy cannot currently separate anyone who applied for a religious exemption due to a ruling in a federal lawsuit.

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 241934Z MAY 22 MID200001745462U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO CNO WASHINGTON DC NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 120/22 MSGID/NAVADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N4/MAY// SUBJ/PROCEDURES FOR NOTIFYING CIVILIAN LAW ENFORCEMENT OF ISSUANCE OF A MILITARY PROTECTIVE ORDER// REF/A/MSG/CNO WASHINGTON DC/R 081428Z NOV 19// REF/B/DOC/10 U.S.C.// REF/C/DOC/32 C.F.R.// REF/D/DOC/DOD/28MAR13// REF/E/DOC/SECNAV/10AUG18// REF/F/DOC/OPNAV/13AUG15// REF/G/DOC/DOD/15DEC21// REF/H/DOC/OPNAV/20MAY20// REF/I/DOC/SECNAV/23SEP19// REF/J/DOC/DOD/12FEB2020// REF/K/DOC/GAO-21-289/31MAY21// NARR/REF A IS NAVADMIN 252/19, PROCEDURES FOR NOTIFYING CIVILIAN LAW ENFORCEMENT OF ISSUANCE OF A MILITARY PROTECTIVE ORDER. REF B IS TITLE 10, U.S.C. SECTION 1567A, MANDATORY NOTIFICATION OF ISSUANCE OF MILITARY PROTECTIVE ORDER TO CIVILIAN LAW ENFORCEMENT. REF C IS TITLE 32 C.F.R. PART 105.9, COMMANDER AND MANAGEMENT SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROCEDURES. REF D IS DODI 6495.02, VOL. 1, SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE: PROGRAM PROCEDURES. REF E IS SECNAVINST 1752.4C, SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROGRAM PROCEDURES. REF F IS OPNAVINST 1752.1C, SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROGRAM. REF G IS DODI 6400.06, DOD COORDINATED COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC ABUSE INVOLVING DOD MILITARY AND CERTAIN AFFILIATED PERSONNEL. REF H IS OPNAVINST 1752.2C, FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM. REF I IS SECNAV M-5210.1, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. REF J IS UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE MEMO, PLACING MILITARY PROTECTIVE ORDERS IN THE NATIONAL CRIME INFORMATION CENTER PROTECTIVE ORDER FILE. REF K IS GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 21-289, DOMESTIC ABUSE: ACTIONS NEEDED TO IMPROVE DOD'S PREVENTION, RESPONSE AND OVERSIGHT.// POC/CWO5 MUEHLHAUSER, THOMAS D/CNO WASHINGTON DC/OPNAV N4I62/ TEL: (703) 695-5526/EMAIL: THOMAS.D.MUEHLHAUSER.MIL@US.NAVY.MIL// RMKS/1. This NAVADMIN cancels reference (a) and directs compliance with references (b) through (k). Reference (j) places military protective orders (MPO) in the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database. References (b) through (i) remain current and in effect. Per reference (j), all commanding officers (CO) will place all active MPOs in NCIC Protection Order File (POF) for the duration of the order, regardless of whether any individual involved in the MPO resides on a military installation. MPOs will be submitted via the Consolidated Law Enforcement Operations Center (CLEOC) in accordance with paragraph 3 of this message, for inclusion into NCIC, as required. MPOs issued by a CO remain in effect until the military commander terminates the order or issues a replacement order and will remain in NCIC for the duration of the order. Per references (d), (e), (f), and (h), all issued and modified MPOs will be documented with Department of Defense Form 2873 (DD Form 2873), February 2020, or subsequent version. Cancelled MPOs will be removed from NCIC upon receipt of Department of Defense Form 2873-1 (DD Form 2873-1), January 2020, or subsequent version. Commands will retain MPO records within local files in accordance with reference (i). 2. Authorities a. Per references (f) through (h), COs have authority to issue an MPO when necessary to safeguard victims, quell disturbances, and maintain good order and discipline, which may provide victims time to pursue a protection order through a civilian court (should they choose to do so) or support an existing civilian protection order (CPO). b. COs should consult with the first Staff Judge Advocate in their chain of command to determine how to best address CPO/MPO violations. 3. Responsibilities a. Commander, Navy Installations Command (CNIC) must: (1) Provide installation commanders with a process to submit all issued, modified, and terminated MPOs to Navy Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) via CLEOC. (2) In support of applicable Navy COs without access to CLEOC, provide a process to submit MPOs to the Installation Security Department. Installation Security Departments will submit MPOs to NCIS via CLEOC. b. COs: (1) COs with assigned Navy Security Forces Command Master-At-Arms, Independent Duty Master-At-Arms, or Security Officers (649x/749x) Performing law enforcement duties shall utilize CLEOC Protective Order Module to ensure all issued, modified, and terminated MPOs are submitted to NCIS. (2) COs of shore based tenant activities located on a Navy installation will immediately submit issued MPOs to the applicable host installation CO for entry into CLEOC. (3) COs of shore based activities not located on a Navy installation will immediately forward MPOs directly to their assigned NCIS Field Office or the nearest Navy installation CO for entry into CLEOC and ultimately into the NCIC POF. (4) COs of afloat units, in port, are required to immediately submit MPOs via CLEOC. If an afloat unit is underway, deployed, or not otherwise able to access CLEOC, MPOs will be submitted as soon as network connectivity is resumed. For emergent situations, MPOs shall be forwarded to the applicable Navy installation CO or NCIS Field Office for entry into CLEOC. (5) COs must provide notice to any Service member subject to a MPO or CPO that failure to comply with MPO or CPO terms may result in Administrative or other disciplinary action, to include potential criminal prosecution in accordance with the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). (6) COs must monitor CPOs and MPOs issued to personnel within their command per reference (k). In the event of a transfer of a Service member with an existing CPO or MPO, COs must contact the gaining command within seven calendar days of the pending transfer and recommend the gaining command CO issue a new MPO upon arrival to the gaining unit. (7) COs must report any modifications or cancellation of the MPO via CLEOC Protective Order Module. (8) Per references (d) through (f) and (h), COs should consult a judge advocate prior to issuing or terminating a MPO. c. Commander, Naval Legal Service Command (CNLSC): (1) CNLSC will ensure Region Legal Service Offices provide judge advocate support to commanders without their own servicing staff judge advocate throughout the MPO issuance and termination process. (2) CNLSC will ensure a module on the issuance of MPOs is included in the training curriculum for prospective commanding officers and executive officers, and for judge advocates and legal officers. d. Service members must comply with MPOs and CPOs. In addition to UCMJ Article 128b, MPO violations may also result in discipline for violation of UCMJ, Article 92. Further, CPO violations may also subject offenders to discipline for violations of UCMJ, Article 134 pursuant to the Assimilative State Crimes Act, 18. U.S.C. 134. 4. MPO Forms. The current and fillable version of DD Form 2873 and 2873-1 can be found at: https://www.esd.whs.mil/directives/forms/. On the effective date of this message, the current version of the MPO forms are DD Form 2873, February 2020, and DD Form 2873-1, January 2020. Previous versions of MPO DD Forms will not be accepted. 5. This NAVADMIN will remain in effect until superseded or cancelled. 6. Released by VADM R. L. Williamson, CNO N4.// BT #0001 NNNN CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

WASHINGTON — Officials for the Department of Veteran Affairs on Wednesday announced a $20 million challenge that invites the public to find ways to reduce the veteran suicide rate.

SELRES Cycle 110 E-4 to E-6 Petty Officer advancement results schedule May 27: Quotas release June 2: BOL TRIAD release June 3: All-Hands release Overall advancement opportunity for this cycle has increased from last year.

The grounding resulted from an accumulation of unit-level errors and omissions that fell far below U.S. Navy standards. PEARL HARBOR — The U.S. Navy has released the command investigation into the USS Connecticut (SSN 22) grounding that occurred on October 2, 2021. USS Connecticut grounded on an uncharted seamount while operating submerged in a poorly surveyed area in international waters in the Indo-Pacific region. The investigation determined the grounding was preventable. Specifically, the grounding resulted from an accumulation of unit-level errors and omissions in navigation planning; watch team execution; and risk management – all of which fell far below U.S. Navy standards. The investigation and endorsements describes what happened, promulgates lessons learned, memorializes completed corrective actions, documents accountability actions, and delineates pending actions that must be finalized with a sense of urgency. In addition to addressing the unit-level errors that caused the grounding, the investigation highlighted specific areas for improvement in the deployment training and certification process – and the Navy is urgently implementing these improvements across the Submarine Force. This investigation delineates 28 corrective actions, of which 14 actions are complete, 13 actions are in progress, and 1 action is enduring. In implementing these significant improvements, the Navy will become a more effective fighting force. Given the inherently dangerous nature of Naval operations, we cannot become a risk-averse or zero-defect organization, but prioritizing safety will engender a culture of greater attention to detail in operational tasks, enhanced procedural compliance, and a questioning attitude that constantly seeks improvement – which increases the readiness of our forces and the Navy’s lethality in combat.

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED ROUTINE R 241719Z MAY 22 MID200001745112U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 119/22 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/DNS/MAR// SUBJ/USS CONSTITUTION CHIEF PETTY OFFICER HERITAGE TRAINING 2022// POC/OPNAV COORDINATOR/ELIZABETH STAFFORD/SCPO/COORD/703-695-4948/ Elizabeth.m.stafford2.mil@us.navy.mil RMKS/1. This NAVADMIN announces the 2022 USS CONSTITUTION CPO Heritage Weeks Training. USS CONSTITUTION, located in Boston, Massachusetts, will host Fiscal Year 2023 CPO Selectees on 19-23 September (Week 1) and 26-30 September (Week 2) 2022. 2. CPO Selectees will work aboard "Old Ironsides" where they will be immersed in more than 220 years of naval heritage while learning about the art of sailing, construction of the ship, and handling of 19th century guns. The training will culminate in bringing USS CONSTITUTION alive and getting underway. 3. USS CONSTITUTION will host 120 CPO Selectees and 27 mentors each week. Mentors shall be seasoned Chief and Senior Chief Petty Officers. All nominations will be provided via each respective Fleet or Force Master Chief. Coordinators for the Fleet or Force Master Chiefs will provide all nominations to the OPNAV Coordinator listed in this message, with the following subject line "MENTOR NOMINATION (WEEK #)" or "SELECTEE NOMINATION (WEEK #)." Mentor nominations are due by close of business 15 June 2022. Reserve and Active CPO Selectee nominations are due one week following the release of the respective selection board results. All quotas and staffing are coordinated through the OPNAV coordinator and coordinators for the respective Fleet or Force Master Chiefs; individual Command Master Chiefs and CPOs shall not contact USS CONSTITUTION or OPNAV Coordinator for nominations or available billets. 4. Attendee costs for this OPNAV-authorized, mission essential training event are to be authorized from attendee unit training funds. Unit Commanding Officers shall determine whether CPO/CPO Selectees assigned to their unit should attend, taking into account the availability of unit training funds. 5. Logistical information such as travel recommendations and uniform requirements will be emailed to all participants once their attendance has been confirmed. 6. Released by Mr. Andrew S. Haeuptle, Director, Navy Staff.// BT #0001 NNNN UNCLASSIFIED

Does anyone have any intel on the quotas. I'm getting bombarded with that question.

In 2021, 157 sailors illegally fled the U.S. Navy, more than double the number who deserted in 2019. Although all but eight of them eventually returned to their units, a military legal expert says the dramatic increase in desertions may be a sign of a bigger issue.

7371 Aerial Vehicle Operator (AVO) Warrant Officer (WO) Program Update: The AVO Program Authorization (PA 106A) has been updated. Highlights of the new PA 106A are as follows: Packages due 29 July, board 22 August Enlisted applicants must have less than 12 years total service Must achieve a score of 96 or higher on ASTB SUPer test Education requirement is a minimum 2-year Associates Degree Age, must be at least 19 years old, not pass 32 years old at time of commissioning Age waivers are the only waivers that will be considered

Mustang Lariat - May 2022 Vol. 1

FY-23 Seaman to Admiral Applications — What's New this Year

VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. - Sailors assigned to Naval Technical Training Center Lackland took first place in the team rifle completion for small commands during the Pacific Fleet and All Navy (West) Rifle and Pistol Championships. The competition took place at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton in California from April 22 through May 1.

Eight Democrats on the House Armed Services Committee called on Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin to remove the revenue requirement at base commissaries, which would lower grocery prices and help military families better cope with fast-rising inflation. “Many of our military families are struggling to meet their basic needs due to rising prices,” the lawmakers wrote to Austin in letter dated May 11.

The Navy relieved the commanding officer of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 28 on May 10, the sea service announced Thursday.