Tony

Dang it HMCIDC you beat me to the post , but will also give my two cents worth (and everyone here is welcome and encouraged to do that too) Doc, I can always empathize with someone who works hard or has a stressful position but someone abusing their position is a complete turn off for me going way back - especially when it involves the Navy and the impact on Sailors. One of my things that throws everything else out the window... And if she is a liaison she should not be involved in the vetting process. HMCIDC's post is better with the response but wanted to add my two cents that that is not acceptable in the Navy

He - got it... wow, I could see if it was a mistake and then she corrected the errors, but that is abuse of one's positions, no if, ands or buts. In those types of situations I always wonder "who is their supervisor?" As I mentioned the program fits the needs of the Navy and "best qualified" should not be determined by personal choice. Unbelievable... I agree with what you said and hope that this will be able to affect change and make the vetting more professional.

HMCIDC mentions something about the poor support on the first page and that he (or she?) was going to mention the poor support. I hope we get updated on that too. This program serves the needs of the Navy. It isn't as if you all are asking for a freebie or something.

anyone gonna' add their profile picture?

yes very sad...

this time it was someone from Russia - they use the server assets to do things over the internet.

yep, well 99% for you... and actually someone hacked into the older server rendering it useless. It was full speed ahead though to get things back running for you all. welcome back smf8

and imagine the time I spent hunting for a more secure yet cost effective server and then rebuilding the forum and website, working into the late hours of the night - all just for you...

http://www.navy.mil/ah_online/documents/CY220RC.pdf

http://www.navy.mil/ah_online/documents/CY220FTS.pdf