Tony

I closed the Mentor section for now due to lack of interest. Butt (and that's a big but ), if enough people are interested we can fire that one back up. Also, at a later time after I talk with trusted members, we can choose another time period where there may be more interest. Additionally we can try other things that may enhance your career. For example one night we had a roundtable, can't remember the topic though but it proved very popular. Just remember that the forum is here to help give you an edge in pursuing your career goals; that’s my main function here…

Cycle 222 Jan 14 CPO Selection Board Eligibility Results - Active Duty http://www.slideshare.net/NETPDTC/222-active-duty-selection-board-eligible-list

CTT1 H notified first though ...

ok, check NavyLawLN's post above!

no results at the moment?

as in, can someone take a peek now?

has someone checked?

no problem...

does anyone have a status on the results... who's checkin'?

welcome aboard

Well IBNFE6, When you send me that pm, I assume you are not willing to read the guidelines and expect me to take time out of my schedule (I have one too) to explain to you what is already in black and white. Is this because you think you are special? (Inquiring minds want to know.)

ok, I trust you.

It really is, and if you would have seen the email exchange between Pers - 8 and I, you would have thought is was a food fight...

Actually, when I was trying to get results like other medias I was corresponding with PERS 8 not NETC who does set the quotas or something like that but does not release the results. They are on that chart too though...

On a sidebar, I do not believe NETPDTC releases the results (or do they) and are speculating just as much as we are. They do have some good sources but so do we on this forum.

Now is a good time to remind some that they should read the guidelines

Having seen this post earlier, I felt obligated to throw my two cents worth particularly about luck and that Ltjg (almost LT) who in all actuality does deserve his or her selection. I definitely can say you have a genuine care for the Navy and am glad you are serving in the best Navy in the world: I do not agree though that you had your selection taken away from you, or that someone took your place. I believe it was a matter of you not meeting the criteria for OCS ; the same rules that all others have to follow. In the process of getting selected for OCS, through vetting, someone discovered something that honestly you should have found yourself – that you did not meet the criteria for a particular program because of your age. You state that someone was selected as an alternate so I assume this was caught later, but I believe this is something that could have been avoided from the onset. I felt compelled to post mainly because I do not think that anyone chosen for a particular program was chosen because of luck or fate, alternate or otherwise. They earned it, just as you and others have earned my respect for making Chief, because they were fully qualified.

As long as everything is civil and respectful, debates, arguments and even soapbox grandstanding is fine on the forum, thanks.

had to do some needed maintenance, no worries

i thought i saw a message someplace about the security enhancements or something like that. i'm getting old cuz' i read it because of my server issues but cant remember...

well I hope you stick around...

well I like your positive outlook on that. yes redtab got it...

I think I'm gonna' pas out

WOW!!!

Remember NvyG8tr, as with the MSC group, there is legitimate networking here with members willing to help