LSHARP

How long you get attention lol

I'm the only FTS eligible at a mostly active command so I'd be going through alone for about a month if I make it.

That would be interesting if they made that change.

29 June is my guess for FTS results

This auto reply is your receipt that the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) selection board team has received your correspondence. Below is some helpful information to assist you during the selection board process, we wish you the best of luck! 1. Processing Selection Board Packages: The time and date board packages are received in the Customer Service Center Inbox is the time and date used for deadline verification (Central Time). Selection Board Packages are processed on a first-in, first-out basis and normally have a turnaround time of THREE to FIVE business days. The status of your Package is viewable within the Selection Board Database. 2. To determine the status of your Selection Board Packages: a. Go to www. public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/Pages/default.aspx b. In the far right column, click on "Selection Board Status" c. Follow the instructions on the screen to log into the Selection Board Status Database d. In the "Service Request List", click on the request number of the Service Request 3. Future Selection Board Packages: The CSCSELBOARD@NAVY.MIL mailbox account is capable of receiving ‘ENCRYPTED’ correspondence IAW DoD policy. If your package has been submitted ‘Unencrypted’, there is NO NEED to resubmit. If you experience any issues or have questions about submitting your Promotion Board correspondence please contact the NPC Customer Service Center at 1-866-U ASK NPC, DSN 882-5672 or e-mail uasknpc@navy.mil Email right after I sent in my letter #3 says If your package has been submitted ‘Unencrypted’, there is NO NEED to resubmit. so all hope is not lost.

I believe the board will still receive your letter even if it's not encrypted. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

I've been told the most recent, if you went from P to EP they'll see that. I doubt they throw you to the side because your oldest eval is a P.

What's the difference in your opinion?

I'm thinking the 18th or the 19th Board convenes on the 22nd.

My first command isn't in my PSR but it is in my history of assignments. How much of an issue is this? I was active duty my first command before I converted to FTS.

That's what I thought originally. Physical fitness is not as big of a factor for promotion as some of the other branches. I just don't know if it's worth it to submit.

I was more looking toward the fact that I am not getting only a satisfactory I have been going above and beyond to maintain an excellent score since 2011. Navy eval only says PP everyone who hasn't failed has that. But if they look at it already then no need. Thanks.

I know I will get wide varying opinions. Should I include my PRIMS printout in my LTB? No less than Excellent PFA score since 2011. Looking for pros and cons. I am of opinion that it should in fact hold weight, I am not getting by on the bare minimum consistently.

Just found out I got my ticket punched. Now on to the board. Congrats to everyone who gets the good news lets ensure our records are on point.

What would be the best way to include in your LTB that you are in a NEC awarding class enroute to your gaining command¿

FTS is really tight with detailing I would love to go Expeditionary. There are usually only 2-3 options to choose from. The detailer already told me there's no instructor billets. I'm a lil nervous choosing this time. I want a competitive billet.

1st USS Donald Cook DDG 75- DLR Manager 2nd NOSC Fort Carson- Independent storekeeper 3rd VP-62-LPO 2813,2829,3001,9590,9595,95PT NECs I have held CFL, Department Career Counselor, CTT Lead, EAWS Coordinator, FCPOA VP, and President, Color Guard Lead, I am FTS

First look is this month Chief

Let's go getting ready for next year. LS here: 9 years in this in going to be my 2nd time up Sailorization throughout my Evals, SEJPME, PPME, surface and air warfare qualed, 2813,9590,3001,2829,95PT and will have my 9595 necs FCPOA VP and interim President for 5 months documented on Evals, volunteer service in Evals but no MOVSM, no degree, chaired numerous MAP, JSOQ, JSOY, EAWS boards, CTT lead, Department Career Counselor, Color Guard Lead, EAWS Coordinator, LPO. I am in my orders window what should be my focus when I check into my next command as far as collaterals, I plan on leaving here ranked EP.

What if they didn't tell you why you didn't make it but released a rack and stack of where you did fall out?

He said something to the effect of the board realizing that reporting seniors want ing to change their average so a cycle my have low trait averages but as long as you are consistently over the group average you get points.

I asked a Master Chief who has set boards what is weighed more ITA vs SGA or ITA vs RSCA he said SGA. Said RSCA wasn't a major factor.

I honestly believe it was a gross oversight at the command I didn't hold any of the typical collateral duties that would raise that block and completely over looked it on both Evals. Training on my part to go line by line every time. I just hope that this doesn't paint an inconsistent picture of me.

Just noticed an oversight on my part my first eval at my squadron I got a P the average was 3.55 and I got a 3.43 my EO block was a 4 the next eval I got a MP the average was 3.66 and I got a 3.86 but my EO block was a 3. My question is this a distractor or does it throw mixed signals to the board?

That math only works if they are looking at one record at a time. They review records in panels so I'm sure more time is dedicated to going through our records.