Tony

no problem, oh you remember those days (we also did that roundtable ), yeah it takes more resources and time for internet security but hopefully what I have in place is good. So far this morning attempts were made from the U.S., China, Ukraine and Germany but the difference was they were all automatically blocked. Thanks and let the fun continue...

And so once again the day is saved, thanks to the Powerpuff Girls! (don't ask) (or at least ask YNC(SS) )

actually it was good timing, almost spit my drink out because I was adding some extra security stuff that is greek to me and I have tighten the hatches and I saw your post and it reminded me about why I was knocking my head against the wall just now.

lol, busted! thought I wouldn't see that heh?

Heads up that the guidelines are located here - > http://www.navyadvancement.com/forum-guidelines.php

as a sidebar, I accidentally deleted the MECP thread after removing a member for blatantly violating the guidelines (it's easier to do that booboo than you know). If anyone wishes to fire it back up that is cool.

scuttlebutt is always fine so no need to apologize, you came back and explained and that's good enough here...

thanks for joining

No problem, thank you for joining Dogg. I had to redo the forum people, all accounts were lost so you will have to create a new account if you want to join in the mix

Thank you kindly, this website is locked down tight security wise now but that other one got through because it came from behind an Navy NMCI which is a first on me - but will pursue.

People, that last poster was banned. I strongly recommend that if anyone sent information to that company that they make no further contact with them. Further bulletins possible.

thanks, HMCIDC

I've posted the Navy Core Values and Code of Ethics in the Navy Policy, Guidelines & Official Statements forum. Good read for those aspiring to become an officer in the United States Navy

Others have said she can be pleasant too. (yet others have said the opposite) Still, if she did something wrong /unethical, especially in her position, she should be held accountable. As I understand, the Master Chief of the USS Jason Dunham is pleasant and popular too but should be held accountable if proven guilty for the incident linked below. It's about abusing one's position that is the issue. Something that does not sit well with me especially when it impacts someone's career. Very much appreciate your post though... Female sailors forced to march with buckets of human waste, Navy says http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/12/20/21989350-female-sailors-forced-to-march-with-buckets-of-human-waste-navy-says

well, I think that would be the better option than having our shipmates going insane and calling Ms. Kemp asking "Are we there yet?"

That would be great thanks much!

no problem

Out of sympathy for you all waiting, I made a MSC - IPP page on NavyAdvancement.com. If you have any input please send it my way http://www.navyadvancement.com/enlisted-officer/medical-service-corps-ipp.php

If anything comes out of this please let us know. I'm curious to see if there is a positive outcome and hopeful that that type of behavior does not continue. Thanks for the posts.

Dang it HMCIDC you beat me to the post , but will also give my two cents worth (and everyone here is welcome and encouraged to do that too) Doc, I can always empathize with someone who works hard or has a stressful position but someone abusing their position is a complete turn off for me going way back - especially when it involves the Navy and the impact on Sailors. One of my things that throws everything else out the window... And if she is a liaison she should not be involved in the vetting process. HMCIDC's post is better with the response but wanted to add my two cents that that is not acceptable in the Navy

He - got it... wow, I could see if it was a mistake and then she corrected the errors, but that is abuse of one's positions, no if, ands or buts. In those types of situations I always wonder "who is their supervisor?" As I mentioned the program fits the needs of the Navy and "best qualified" should not be determined by personal choice. Unbelievable... I agree with what you said and hope that this will be able to affect change and make the vetting more professional.

HMCIDC mentions something about the poor support on the first page and that he (or she?) was going to mention the poor support. I hope we get updated on that too. This program serves the needs of the Navy. It isn't as if you all are asking for a freebie or something.

anyone gonna' add their profile picture?

yes very sad...