Jump to content

News, Scuttlebutt Forum | Navy Policy

This forum contains news of interest to Enlisted Sailors and their family about the United States Navy in general, scuttlebutt, current events, political, and news that may not fit in other categories but is related to, or may impact Navy personnel. News sources may come from the Navy or from the commercial media. Additionally included is a sub-forum related to official Navy policy.


Subforums

  1. Navy Policy, Guidelines and Official Statements

    This forum covers BUPERS & NPC news, and Navy ALNAVs & NAVADMINs messages regarding policies, guidelines and other official statements. This might be some good read for career minded Sailors & supervisors who should be aware of these Navy policies.

    56
    posts

401 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 606 views
    • 0 replies
    • 670 views
    • 0 replies
    • 464 views
    • 0 replies
    • 671 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 0 replies
    • 790 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 0 replies
    • 992 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 0 replies
    • 998 views
    • 0 replies
    • 955 views
    • 0 replies
    • 975 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 0 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 0 replies
    • 993 views
    • 0 replies
    • 2.4k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.8k views
  • Posts

    • The Constellation | Navy HR Service | Dec 2025
    • CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED/ ROUTINE R 011642Z DEC 25 MID120012254820U FM CHINFO WASHINGTON DC TO NAVADMIN BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 239/25 MSGID/NAVADMIN/CHINFO WASHINGTON DC/NOV// SUBJ/MASS COMMUNICATION SPECIALIST PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION STANDARD PROGRAM// REF/A/DOC/CHINFOINST 1510.1 MASS COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION STANDARD (PQS) PROGRAM DATED 26 NOV 25 REF/B/DOC/ OPNAVINST 3500.24 (Series) PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION STANDARDS PROGRAM REF/C/DOC/NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING (NAVETRA) 43242-B POC/MCCM HOLLY GRAY/PROGRAM COORDINATOR/HOLLY.A.BOYNTONGRAY.MIL(AT)US.NAVY.MIL/ RMKS/1. To initialize procedures and identify regional qualifiers for the Mass Communication Specialist (MC) Personnel Qualification Standard (PQS) program, this instruction establishes guidance in accordance with references (a) through (c). These guiding instructions define the qualification standards, Navy-wide PQS policy, and education and training requirements necessary for MCs serving in Public Affairs (PA) or Visual Information (VI) assignments, and provide the governing framework for completing sections 301- 304 of the MC PQS. 2. This NAVADMIN applies to both Active and Reserve Public Affairs Officers (PAO). The program is mandatory for Active component and optional for the Reserve component. 3. All MCs are required to complete their pay grade-normed watch station at a minimum. Non-MCs, such as personnel assigned to PA or VI duties or developing their MC skills, may complete the PQS with approval from their chain of command. 4. Released by RDML J. A. Robinson III, Chief of Information.// BT #0001 NNNN CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED/
    • Who is telling the truth? (neither party...)
    • In my opinion, the reason trump said he wouldn't have wanted a second hit is that he wants to covering his butt for any possible investigation or litigation. He'd rather Pentagon pete walk the plank. He probably slept good that night... 👀 “I wouldn’t have wanted that, not a second strike,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned to Washington. “The first strike was very lethal; it was fine. And if there were two people around … but Pete said that didn’t happen. I have great confidence in him. “I’m going to find out about it, but Pete said he did not order the death of those two men.”
    • Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., said Sunday he believes "it's very possible there was a war crime committed" in the administration's first strike against an alleged drug trafficking boat in the Caribbean Sea in September.  "I think it's very possible there was a war crime committed. Of course, for it to be a war crime, you have to accept the Trump administration's whole construct here ... which is we're in armed conflict, at war with this particular -- with the drug gangs. Of course, they've never presented the public with the information they've got here," Van Hollen said on ABC News' "This Week." "If that theory is wrong, then it's plain murder." So if war crimes were committed, Admiral Frank M. "Mitch" Bradley and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth would most likely be the two upfront characters that would be tried, I believe by a military court. However, if it is not classified as war they would be tried for murder. Others most likely would be involved... According to recent news reports based on leaked information, U.S. Navy Admiral Frank M. "Mitch" Bradley ordered a second missile strike on two survivors of an alleged drug-trafficking boat in the Caribbean in September 2025. This was reportedly done to comply with a directive from Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to "kill everybody" on board the vessel. 
×
×
  • Create New...
Forum Home
www.NavyAdvancement.com
Boots | Navy Patches
Serving enlisted, veterans, spouses & family