FY17 Chief Selection Board

[Tony]

Just now, navyordie123 said:

Ok, that sounds right so I'll go with the 3rd for triad release

All righty then, the count is on - any other picks folks?

[Guest AZ4Ever]

I'm going with the 4th for triad release.

[Tony]

18 minutes ago, AZ4Ever said:

I'm going with the 4th for triad release.

Okie doke, countdown has been updated

[Guest navyordie123]

Well here we go people, countdown started til it's game time. I hope everyone gets playing time. Good luck to all!!!!

[Tony]

I'm changing the code to include Washington D.C. timezone, is that correct?

[Tony]

1 minute ago, ET1IWSW said:

Is it DC or Millington?

not sure, hoping someone has the gouge. I can easily change it but I don't know - thought it was dc.

[Tony]

14 minutes ago, CPO_Pride247 said:

The times that are given are usually given in eastern time zone. That is why the last few times it has been released at 1100 eastern. Yes Millington is central time, but the results are given for eastern. For example from the SELRES and FTS:

E7 FTS and SELRES board results release schedule - Command Triad Notified via BOL Wed, 29 Jun 1100EST, public release via NAVADMIN 30 Jun

Okay, we are good to go then, thanks.

[Tony]

good to go, the countdown has been updated. The countdown is for the date only but you can throw in the hour too if you are feeling salty enough. 

[Guest]

On 7/3/2016 at 7:04 AM, ~Squidly said:

Been doing some math, let's just say I was inspired. 

I averaged the time from board adjournment to release of results for the last decade, well 11 years actually (had to go back one extra year to toss out the Millington flooding fiasco). 16.37 days.

Next I used the same 10 years to count the number of days in what we now call phase II, averaged them, and rounded to the nearest whole week. 6 weeks.

So, August 3rd lines up perfectly on the graph for release AND also hits a bullseye for the 6 week phase II.

August 3rd is my vote as well. 

[Guest LAVESE]

My vote Aug 3rd

[Tony]

Okay, countdown has been updated, 2 more votes for aug 3.

[Guest OrdieDevilDolphin]

1 hour ago, Tony said:

Okay, countdown has been updated, 2 more votes for aug 3.

Same AUG 3

[Guest EM_UNO]

Aug 3rd is my vote also!

[Guest Boyblue74]

I vote 03 Aug as well, folks!

[Guest Admin_warrior]

August 3rd I vote for too! 

[Guest navyordie123]

So I don't know how anyone else feels but always around this time of year, of course the anxiousness sets it but also a feeling of lets just get the results out of the way so we can move on and get ready for next year. I'm really hoping that I pick up but probably just like most it's a feeling of being unsure and wondering what's gonna happen.

[Tony]

Ok updated. 11 votes for Aug 3 and 1 vote for Aug 4.

[Guest FCC_Thawk]

My vote is for August 3 triad, August 4 public release. 

[Tony]

Just now, FC1THawk said:

My vote is for August 3 triad, August 4 public release. 

ok got it

[Guest CTT1(IW/SW/AW)]

hello everybody, long time lurker figured I'd ask a question here and hope to get some opinions. Has anybody ever seen an eval that is MP above summary group average but is an adverse eval because the sailors last eval was #4 EP. Same senior reporter and no justification in write up. I'm curious if this is going to be a five year killer. Thanks for the opinions.

[Guest navyordie123]

Maybe the majority will be right and it will be the 3rd cause the sooner the better. 

[Guest FCC_Thawk]

58 minutes ago, CTT1(IW/SW/AW) said:

hello everybody, long time lurker figured I'd ask a question here and hope to get some opinions. Has anybody ever seen an eval that is MP above summary group average but is an adverse eval because the sailors last eval was #4 EP. Same senior reporter and no justification in write up. I'm curious if this is going to be a five year killer. Thanks for the opinions.

I have seen it and from what I've been told it is a detractor. The precepts outlines this situation. 

[Guest CTT1(IW/SW/AW)]

9 minutes ago, FC1THawk said:

I have seen it and from what I've been told it is a detractor. The precepts outlines this situation. 

Oh it's definitely a detractor, but being above summary group average and reporting senior average makes it a very weird circumstance.

[Guest FCC_Thawk]

And nothing is stated in the eval? Very strange to say the least. 

[Guest]

5 hours ago, CTT1(IW/SW/AW) said:

hello everybody, long time lurker figured I'd ask a question here and hope to get some opinions. Has anybody ever seen an eval that is MP above summary group average but is an adverse eval because the sailors last eval was #4 EP. Same senior reporter and no justification in write up. I'm curious if this is going to be a five year killer. Thanks for the opinions.

There are a lot of moving pieces there.  How many in your summary group (last year & this year)? How far above average, are we talking .1 or a .9? What was the reason given by your reporting senior in adverse notification memo?  What is the difference between last year's trait average and this year? ... plus a hundred other questions. 

And ultimately, what happened? WHY did you drop from EP to MP? Miss a qualification deadline, get sent home from an IA, miss a bunch of car/rent payments, PRT failure, etc? THIS, will be your indicator for how long it could possibly hurt you, and what you can do to overcome it.

Without the entire story, all you'll get is an intelligent guess.

3 hours ago, CS_UNO said:

My question is it mandatory to run or will cardio options be available for LLD selectees?

I'm assuming the final official PRT has to be done by the run.

That's why you do a PARFQ before phase II, so that you won't be left behind during PT team building if you're TLD. It's in everyone's best interest to not break someone else even more. I'm sure some of the CPOs will chime in and confirm this.

@Tony this should be a sticky, or added as an FAQ on that awesome cheat-sheet you've been putting together. It gets brought up multiple times each year.