Jump to content
Navy Forum for Enlisted, Reserves, Veterans, Chiefs & Spouses

FY 15 Chief Selection Board

Guest jenkballs
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Tony

    475

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Guest SaseboIT
Guest SaseboIT

Thanks Tony!   Ok...I have posted this year's USS Constitution CPO Heritage Training message in the Career forum.   I myself would truly like to be involved in this kind of training!

Guest HTz
Guest HTz

when you think about a selection board you have to realize its mainly your record.  BOL, NSIPS, NDAWS is what should be perfect.  Evals should be the main focus with qualifications, and this should al

Guest
Guest

all the lurkers should apply for accounts. In the coming weeks and months there will be some very valuable information shared on this forum. The more contributers the better!!!

Guest Blondie

Guest Blondie

Posted
Posted

Tony what ever happened to RebTab

I vaguely recall him getting selected for some sort of commissioning program - he may be busy with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest ordie230

Guest ordie230

Posted
Posted

Quick question... I have a 1 of 1 transfer EP . The opening states" ranked # 1 of 100 PO1s" is that a good look or will they not pay any mind to that since its a 1 of 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Blondie

Guest Blondie

Posted
Posted

Quick question... I have a 1 of 1 transfer EP . The opening states" ranked # 1 of 100 PO1s" is that a good look or will they not pay any mind to that since its a 1 of 1.

A transfer eval may be 1 of 1 but I have seen many times where the block 43 says something along the lines of  "had he been ranked against his peers, he would have been my #1 of ## PO1s."  That actually looks pretty good IMO.  It's no different than when Sailors in very small peer groups have remarks that say "My #1 of 6 PO1s, but would have been my #1 regardless of the group size."  It's just your chain of command taking the extra effort to point out that they think you are doing very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest NukeET1FCFL

Guest NukeET1FCFL

Posted
Posted

I don't have all that either and I was selected this year. You never know when it's your time. Keep your head up. The only thing you control is you.

How do you know that you were selected already?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest ITC(IW/SW/AW)

Guest ITC(IW/SW/AW)

Posted
Posted

How do you know that you were selected already?

 

Probably FTS or Reservist. Their results were release a couple of weeks back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

How do you know that you were selected already?

FTS. Our results came out in June. I am waiting for the Active results to start Phase 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest CTN

Guest CTN

Posted
Posted

Happy Friday everyone and hope you all enjoy your weekend.  I know what ya mean NavMM84; I've had five different chiefs and one senior chief stop by my desk today telling me to be ready and other tid bits of information.  Along with the question "How long have you been in the Navy?"  My answer didn't pass, but I think I found the one they were looking for now =)  I just have to remind myself results are not out and it's not a sure thing so can't think like I made it.  Doesn't hurt to be prepared though I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Papitai

Guest Papitai

Posted
Posted

Wow....your record sounds a lot like mine from the surface.  LS/2000.  6 NAMS, SW/AW. Last 5 years from most current: MP above avg., EP transfer, MP above avg, P, EP Transfer (#1 of 26 call out), EP #5 of 27.  MOVSM, MTS, Bachelor of Science.  My MPs above average are all unranked but my write-ups are pretty strong.

I'm starting to believe the YG theory also... LS/1998. 1 JCOM, 1 COM, 8 NAMS, MOVSM, SOY, AW/SW... Last  Evals from most current: #1 EP of 24, #1 MP, P, Transfer EP, #3 EP, Non ranked MP. All my evals were above average except the "welcome aboard" P. Sooooooooo, I wonder.... :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest AME1

Guest AME1

Posted
Posted

For giggles I looked up my year group, and if that factors in then I don't see me getting selected as my year group overall is above the line.  Now if it goes by rank the the E6's in my year group are below the line.  I then showed the print out to some of the kids in the shop, and after they said they'd never seen it before held a little training about year groups and the old beast that was PTS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Blondie

Guest Blondie

Posted
Posted

Anyone want to stand my watch tonight? I'm mentally and physically exhausted.

Just getting off watch myself, sorry!  Try to have a good one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest AWFChief

Guest AWFChief

Posted
Posted

Quick question... I have a 1 of 1 transfer EP . The opening states" ranked # 1 of 100 PO1s" is that a good look or will they not pay any mind to that since its a 1 of 1.

 

I got one of those too.  From what i've been told that is a "soft ranking" and it's better than just a regular 1 of 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Philwishinson

Guest Philwishinson

Posted
Posted

Forum got me thinking about ygs as well. Hope that doesn't hold much weigh as my yg is way overmanned. Rate overall however is only 86%. Guess we'll see Tue, not that'll confirm the yg theory. IMHO, allowing yourself that scapegoat doesn't help you refocus for next year should the "N" show it's ugly head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest AWFChief

Guest AWFChief

Posted
Posted

Forum got me thinking about ygs as well. Hope that doesn't hold much weigh as my yg is way overmanned. Rate overall however is only 86%. Guess we'll see Tue, not that'll confirm the yg theory. IMHO, allowing yourself that scapegoat doesn't help you refocus for next year should the "N" show it's ugly head.

 

TIR or YG should not be a factor in your selection.  Year groups do play a role in the number of quotas though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

A transfer eval may be 1 of 1 but I have seen many times where the block 43 says something along the lines of  "had he been ranked against his peers, he would have been my #1 of ## PO1s."  That actually looks pretty good IMO.  It's no different than when Sailors in very small peer groups have remarks that say "My #1 of 6 PO1s, but would have been my #1 regardless of the group size."  It's just your chain of command taking the extra effort to point out that they think you are doing very well.

COs who do that want to send a message to selection boards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest NavyAT

Guest NavyAT

Posted
Posted

I wonder now about the whole YG thing.  My rate is at 96% right now. I am an AT YG05. There are no E7s in my YG or the YG before me. I dont know if that means i should have a good shot or if it means i dont have a shot at all. Thoughts?

:graphics-3d-smileys-313328:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

Forum got me thinking about ygs as well. Hope that doesn't hold much weigh as my yg is way overmanned. Rate overall however is only 86%. Guess we'll see Tue, not that'll confirm the yg theory. IMHO, allowing yourself that scapegoat doesn't help you refocus for next year should the "N" show it's ugly head.

YG has nothing to do with your selection folks. Your record gets you selected; not your YG. This is not Career Waypoint or PTS. If a panel goes through your record and thinks you have the potential to be a Chief, they will select you irrespective of your TIS or YG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest LCarp3

Guest LCarp3

Posted
Posted

I'm starting to believe the YG theory also... LS/1998. 1 JCOM, 1 COM, 8 NAMS, MOVSM, SOY, AW/SW... Last  Evals from most current: #1 EP of 24, #1 MP, P, Transfer EP, #3 EP, Non ranked MP. All my evals were above average except the "welcome aboard" P. Sooooooooo, I wonder.... :unsure:

There is certainly some logic to the year group theory.  If you take a look at NPC website under the community managers' tab, you will find concerned rating's enlisted career path.  It notes that the average LSC promotes at 14.4 years.  While my main holdup was an NJP (this being first year it is out of the critical 5 year window), this puts me right in zone.  As of today, I have been in the Navy 14 years, 2 months, and 1 day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest AWFChief

Guest AWFChief

Posted
Posted

There is certainly some logic to the year group theory.  If you take a look at NPC website under the community managers' tab, you will find concerned rating's enlisted career path.  It notes that the average LSC promotes at 14.4 years.  While my main holdup was an NJP (this being first year it is out of the critical 5 year window), this puts me right in zone.  As of today, I have been in the Navy 14 years, 2 months, and 1 day.

 

Like Dogg said, year groups are not factors for selection.  They are used for advancement quotas though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest LCarp3

Guest LCarp3

Posted
Posted

YG has nothing to do with your selection folks. Your record gets you selected; not your YG. This is not Career Waypoint or PTS. If a panel goes through your record and thinks you have the potential to be a Chief, they will select you irrespective of your TIS or YG.I

I do not doubt what you say at all.  I've only heard the term "year group" be thrown around the last 2 years or so.  But as I was looking at the LS Career Path.  Just looking at is from own career's perspective, I had to admit that there was some logic to the matter.  I do not believe the YG is a critical factor, but it is interesting and there is some logic behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

I do not doubt what you say at all.  I've only heard the term "year group" be thrown around the last 2 years or so.  But as I was looking at the LS Career Path.  Just looking at is from own career's perspective, I had to admit that there was some logic to the matter.  I do not believe the YG is a critical factor, but it is interesting and there is some logic behind it.

My YG is 105% and I was selected. I am sure like DOGG said it has nothing to do with it. Besides that YG has nothing to do with who is the best to select.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 🧧 Activity Stream

    1. 0

      DFAS Retiree Newsletter - June

      DFAS Retiree Newsletter - June
      Tony in Military Veteran & Retirees Discussion Forum
    2. 0

      Former VCNO Robert Burke Pleads Not Guilty to Bribery Charges

      WASHINGTON, D.C. – Former Vice Chief of Naval Operations Robert Burke pleaded not guilty to charges of bribery and conspiracy to commit bribery in federal court Monday morning. Burke, who is also charged with performing acts to affect a personal financial interest and concealing material facts, appeared before Judge Trevor McFadden with his two alleged co-conspirators in the District Court for the District of Columbia. Burke was previously held on a bond of $10,000 from his appearance in the Florida federal courts, but McFadden vacated the bond. Burke, Meghan Messenger and Yongchul “Charlie” Kim are all released on their own recognizance.
      Tony in News, Scuttlebutt Forum | Navy Policy
    3. 0

      FY-23 NAVY SAILORS OF THE YEAR (CORRECTED COPY)

      CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED// ROUTINE R 021727Z JUL 24 MID120001259578U FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS// TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS// CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// BT UNCLAS NAVADMIN 130/24 PASS TO OFFICE CODES: INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS// MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/-/JUNE/ SUBJ/FY-23 NAVY SAILORS OF THE YEAR (CORRECTED COPY)// REF/A/DOC/OPNAV/02FEB2015// RMKS/1. I am pleased to announce the selection of the Fiscal Year 2023 Navy Sailors of the Year: Commander, Submarine Force, Atlantic: MMA1(SS) Ortiz, Nicholas A., USS DELAWARE (SSN 791) Commander, Submarine Force U.S. Pacific Fleet: ETV1(SS) Smith, Bryan J., USS SCRANTON (SSN 756) Commander, Naval Surface Force, Atlantic: RS1(SW) Pointer, Tyesha L., USS MESA VERDE (LPD 19) Commander, Naval Surface Force U.S. Pacific Fleet: HM1(SW/FMF) Moore, Joshua P., USS JOHN P. MURTHA (LPD 26) Commander, Naval Air Force, Atlantic: AT1(AW) Mull, Asa R., Patrol and Reconnaissance Squadron SIXTEEN Commander, Naval Air Force U.S. Pacific Fleet: AO1(AW/SW) Robinson, Brittney A., USS RONALD REAGAN (CVN 76) Commander, Naval Information Forces: CTR1(IW/SW/AW) Jorge, Kayla A., Naval Information Warfare Training Group, San Diego Commander, Navy Expeditionary Combat Command: UT1(SCW/EXW/DV) Kearns, Travis R., Underwater Construction Team TWO Commander, Navy Reserve Force: FC1(SW) Clements, John A., Commander Naval Surface Group Southeast Detachment Bravo Commander, Navy Installations Command: MA1 Hasbrouck, Natalie M., Naval Support Activity Bahrain Bureau of Medicine and Surgery: HM1(SW) Munoz, Peter J., Naval Medical Forces Pacific Naval Special Warfare Command: HM1(EXW/DWS/PJ) Drzemiecki, Jonathan A., Logistics and Support Unit EIGHT Commander, Naval Education and Training Command: BM1(SW/AW) Tifft, Brandon P., Mariner Skills Training Center Pacific Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command (Sea): HM1(FMF/SW/AW) Freeman, Sara A., 2nd Marine Logistics Group Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command (Shore): HT1(SW) Hodge, Tom K., PCU JOHN BASILONE (DDG 122) Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet (Sea): HM1(FMF) Che, Nde M., 1st Marine Division Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet (Shore): MMA1(SS) Nemeth, Jack J., Submarine Readiness Squadron 33 Navy Shore: HT1(SW) Schleuning, Jennifer A., Southeast Regional Maintenance Center 2. The competition was robust and reflected the highest caliber of Sailors serving throughout the world. Each of these Sailors represented their commands and the entire enlisted community with distinction. 3. These outstanding Sailors will be advanced to Chief Petty Officer the week of 27 September 2024. 4. NPC will ensure these Sailors are removed from the E-7 selection board eligibility lists. 5. Released by VADM E. H. Black III, Performing the Duties of Director, Navy Staff.// BT #0001 NNNN CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED//
      Tony in Navy Enlisted Career Forum | Rating & Management
×
×
  • Create New...
Forum Home
www.NavyAdvancement.com
Boots | Navy Patches
Serving enlisted, veterans, spouses & family