LS_Chief
-
Posts
65 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Posts posted by LS_Chief
-
-
Just now, Ord3i said:
FLTMPS
Forgot one! lol
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, SubLS said:
Where would this information update at?
CMS, PSR, NSIPS, EST
-
Does anybody else try and be slick and see if any of the sites with the 'prospective rate' date updates early? lol
-
53 minutes ago, Submarinecook1stclass said:
Just want the wait to be over either way. But hopefully in my favor this year!!
Me and you both!!!
-
1 hour ago, PO1_LS said:
Are there any LSs here that maybe wouldn’t mind giving me input on how important USMAPS certifications and DAU courses like ACQ 101 and LOG 101-103 level certs actually matter. 6 of my enclosures were just those inputs. I was told as long as they aren't normal job functions of GCPC required DAU then they should hold weight as steps towards rate mastery. I appreciate the help
The sad thing is I think it depends who is reviewing your package. I have been told getting certs in an area you don't actively work or never actually worked is not rate mastery as you have knowledge you are not using. I have also heard the opposite saying it shows initiative and dedication to you career field.
How have you shown rate mastery and technical knowledge in the jobs you hold? Do your subordinates have cert and hold jobs that you are not qualified in?
-
4 minutes ago, Ord3i said:
I agree with the change BIGTIME!! Collateral duties became an unruly monster in the selection process. The less points they are valued the better.
Could not agree more!!! While collaterals are important we should never get our selves in to a spot where they consume us. We as First Class's are suppose to be SME's in our rates, and should be able to maintain our technical knowledge throughout our Navy career.
-
2
-
-
25 minutes ago, DocEddy8404 said:
I assume you already know what you’re doing well. A few things that stuck out to me was you had 3 evals that are under RSCA. The most recent being a 1 of 1 (7) months under RSCA and a 13 month under RSCA. Not a big deal since the subsequent evals are EP and over RSCA; however, I have seen some PSRs where the member has never been under RSCA even for very short reporting periods.
Thanks for the feed back!
-
Im going to share my ESR and PSR with you all because I would like some feed back. I already shared my last write up a few pages back. This is my first time up and would like some thoughts and or to know if anything stands out good or bad.
-
If I had to rate my self it would be to hard. I was on a ship for my first 5.1 years then recruiting and now I'm at a joint command. I am following my ladr and career path however, I have not had the ability to get a few of the Quals expected based off my command history. but I do get all Quals available to me.
-
26 minutes ago, MILSPOUSE01 said:
I agree, even though I'm the spouse, I'm on pins and needles for my husband. This is his 5th time up for Chief so I'm praying this is his year. Good luck to ALL of you and Thank you for your service.
Get your hubby to join up!!!
-
1
-
-
So when I check the 'advancement selection board' it just shows the N I got from my LDO application. is that normal? or should it be a chief board and the selection status blank.?
-
Happy 'Board Adjourn" day all my fellow hopeful First's!!! May your wait fly by.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, AME1 said:
I haven't payed close attention to it, but I think for the most part they fill all available quotas. I think it's honestly hard to pick which rate didn't fill all quotas. For instance the AME rate is making 12 Chiefs out of I think I saw 86 board eligible firsts. Other rates have hundreds of candidates to choose from. It also depends on the board, and if they feel they do or don't have enough qualified candidates to fill the quotas. To many variables to consider, but that's just my opinion on that topic. Good question though, and might spark some good conversation.
Just trying to entice all these ' lurkers to join in the convo.
-
Delete if not allowed... I'd like to start a discussion topic. Which rates do you all think did not select to quota? Have you all noticed a pattern in this specific incident?
-
I'm starting to understand how that coastie felt when he wanted to be let in to that sub.
-
2
-
-
21 minutes ago, SOUTHCTRCS said:
It absolutely is looked at positively. I personally picked up Senior with 3x evals that were chalked full of Joint leadership. I would even say if you get lucky enough to have someone on your board that has worked in the Joint environment, they will be able to explain to the rest of the board that often times leadership in the Joint world is more difficult than simply leading Sailors. Leadership is leadership. Even in volunteer activities, if you run/lead volunteer activities vice just participate, that carries weight. Highlighting leading peers is always a big one as well. Doesn't matter if they are Navy or not.
Thank you for that Senior.
-
3 minutes ago, Ord3i said:
mine now says "no selection boards to display"
Samzies.
-
1
-
-
I was prob looking in to it to much.
-
1
-
-
Sorry about that my computer would not let me delete those Quote Boxes.
So my question is this. I am at a joint command. I am ranked against other PO1's however, The people that work for me are GS and other branches. Will that be looked at just as positive as leading sailors? here is my write up this last time around.
-
1 minute ago, PO Theo said:
Of course. This is the same with SOQ and SOY grading too, though.
It would be nice to know what the standard across the board is but I don't think we will ever know even if we all make chief lol.
-
4 minutes ago, PO Theo said:
I think EOTW was asking more about the actual scoring process. As in, how many points are awarded for each section. I have seen a grading sheet floating around in the past, but I don't know if they still use that or not.
Yes I have heard of this 'scoring sheet' but from the several board members I have had the pleasure of speaking of the only consistent answer I get is there is no consistency. you could have the 10 different graders grade the same package and get 10 different answers.
-
36 minutes ago, EOTW said:
I know at this point it doesnt matter our fates are sealed but does anyone have any idea how the board grades packages. I've always wondered how scoring is done.
From my understanding they go off of you LADR, Precepts, and Convening order. 2-3 graders will go over your record and give it a raw score. You will then be briefed to a panel of voters who will vote based off of a confidence factor. Say 20 get briefed at a time they will pick a cut off for those tentively selected, and those they are dropping from consideration. The ones in the middle get crunched and are voted for again until quotas are filled.
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, Stazz said:
On leave and had a vivid dream that the board results were released way early and my name was on the list. Had to check this page so I didn't risk sounding like an idiot by calling into work. Is it August yet?
I've been there before lol.
-
I wouldn't worry to much about it. Everybody I know that's board eligible seems to have it. Doubt it means anything one way or the other.
FY20 Chief Selection Board
in Chief Selection Board Forum | Results, Preparation, Records
Posted
Does anybody no anyone who made chief with just JPME and not PPME?