Chief Selection Board Forum | Results, Preparation, Records
This forum is for First Class Petty Officers, Active & Reserve, who are preparing for advancement to Chief. Information includes the selection board process, precepts, quotas, board results and more. Information on Senior and Master Chief are posted here as well.
382 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 4.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 4.1k views
-
- 7 replies
- 7.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 4.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 6.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 9.2k views
-
- Guest
-
- 1 reply
- 5.2k views
-
- Guest
-
- 0 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 11.7k views
-
- Guest
-
- 0 replies
- 7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 5k views
-
- 1 reply
- 13.1k views
-
- Guest
-
- 0 replies
- 4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 6.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 5.1k views
-
- 26 replies
- 15k views
-
- Guest
-
- 2.6k replies
- 776.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 5.7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 3.7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 11.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 5.9k views
-
- Guest
-
- 0 replies
- 2.9k views
-
Posts
-
CFL/ACFLs, CSV File Update: Due to recent PRIMS development, the use of the CSV file has slightly changed. When uploading CSV file(s) for PFA Cycle 2025, CFLs must now separate the CSV file(s) between with medical waiver data and without medical waiver data. For clarity, you cannot upload a single CSV file with mixed data. CFLs will need to upload two different CSV files. Additionally, PFA data which needs to be uploaded for previous PFA Cycles (2024 or earlier), can be submitted to askmncc.fct@navy.mil utilizing the CSV file(s) guidance above (separated by medical waiver and without medical waiver data). CFLs are reminded that all CSV files must be submitted along with the Letter of Correction (LOC) signed by the CO/OIC. It is very important to follow the CSV file directions exactly as indicated to avoid any upload failures. Updated/current guidance can be found under the PRIMS Training link, then CSV File Directions. -
-
The White House continues to largely dismiss a highly sensitive discussion by leading national security officials on the open-source encrypted Signal messaging app that leaked to a reporter. At a White House briefing Wednesday, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the media "continues to be focused on a sensationalized story from the failing Atlantic magazine that is falling apart by the hour." But the leak of operational details lands a little differently with military veterans and especially with active-duty troops, who can be discharged and prosecuted for much lower-level leaks. Security breaches like what happened in the Signal group chat are called "spillage" by the military.
-
WASHINGTON (AP) — The top Republican and Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee requested an investigation Thursday into how Trump national security officials used the Signal app to discuss military strikes and a federal judge said he would order the preservation of the messages, ensuring at least some scrutiny on an episode President Donald Trump has dismissed as frivolous. Sen. Roger Wicker, the Republican chair of the committee, and Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat, signed onto a letter to the acting inspector general at the Department of Defense for an inquiry into the potential “use of unclassified networks to discuss sensitive and classified information, as well as the sharing of such information with those who do not have proper clearance and need to know.”
-
My jaws dropped when I read stuff that would put me in the brig had I released any events even less than what they released. Here Are the Attack Plans That Trump’s Advisers Shared on Signal
-