Jump to content


Forum | Advancement | Career | Veteran | Bases | Enlisted Portal


Tony

FY18 Chief Selection Board

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

SeaBeeDoc

Hi everyone, once again I have received the golden ticket, I have made some changes this year that will hopefully help me get that nod. I have a new command collateral, I have completed my SJPME, and I got my MTS Certification. I have also  have scrubbed and identified areas in my OMPF that need to be corrected. I also have other leadership roles in several committees that I am involved in as well as 365. Although I feel like I was proactive last year, I discovered a few areas where I could improve. As far as the distractors, I believe I have addressed the ones that I can correct on my end.

 I have completed my package and have had several looks and received feedback, next week we are having a Chief's board rodeo with all the Master Chief's  to go over our packages  once I get everyone's feedback I will make adjustments as needed and plan to submit my package before the 29th as I will be out of pocket on convalescence leave in April. My package is due the first of May. I only have two items that might be the deciding factor as to whether I get selected, one is a 1of 1 MP which unfortunately will not drop off until next cycle and although my eval was good it really does not reflect a breakout  from lasts years eval. Regardless, I have drank the kool aide and have done all I can do so if it is meant to be it will be and if not I have no regrets because I know I have done my job well and will continue to do so.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TRON828

Fellow first, FYI.. NKO has January 2017 CPO exam stats on how many people made board in Navy.. 31 for AT FTS... Woo! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HAZEGREY1775
On 2/26/2017 at 5:25 PM, GMFCC said:

SSP is subjective. Everyone on this forum will give you a slightly different answer.

As for acting in the capacity of the Chief, I would recommend you withhold that opinion until you put on anchors. However inept you believe your Chief to be, I have no doubts that he is there in the mess making things happen. Your eyes will open to the responsibility you don't have that you think you do after you are pinned.

Have you told your CoC that you feel that way? Have you pulled your Chief aside and thrown him the bone that people view him negatively? Not engaging in dragging him in the dirt isn't admirable if you're in the crowd watching others do it. I'm sure the people saying they want you as a Chief are right, you're probably a good dude and a great OS, but if you're going to be in this mess, I'd learn to help a shipmate out.

I hope you make it, but the biggest thing I've learned in this mess, is that if you aren't humble, you will be humiliated. If one Chief looks bad, we all look bad.

Yes- Subjective for sure, however, a good rule of thumb to gauge off of is comparing your ITA vs. the RSCA. Usually equates to you being above his/her overall average of all E6's written in the capacity of a reporting senior. You would typically find that the upper MP's fall above the RSCA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
navyordie123

496 out of 822 are board eligible for AOC. that's 60.3%. Cant wait to see what those quotas look like. here is hoping for the best!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guyy804

Can someone help me with NCR FTS exam stats on how many made board? I would greatly appreciate it! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TRON828

Finished the SEJPME I on JKO..long course but passed on first try ;)..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ITJuan(IW/SW/AW) 009
22 minutes ago, @T1 Mo said:

Finished the SEJPME I on JKO..long course but passed on first try ;)..

Awesome job! I heard there is a recent one out. I finished mine last September. Not sure if it's the same one you did.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ITJuan(IW/SW/AW) 009

Good morning/afternoon y'all!

Question. Am I the only one using the "sample LTB" letter head that is displayed on the NPC site under active duty enlisted/general information?  I noticed it's slight different from the previous cycles letter head samples. I'm having my Chief's package reviewed and I was told to leave off  "#1. Please consider this package for the IT rating in my case."  I only had two CPO's look at my Chief's package so far and they both said to remove #1.

Should I leave it or remove it? I'm just following the "Sample LTB."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SeaBeeDoc
On ‎3‎/‎16‎/‎2017 at 3:26 PM, @T1 Mo said:

Fellow first, FYI.. NKO has January 2017 CPO exam stats on how many people made board in Navy.. 31 for AT FTS... Woo! 

84 out of  137 in the HM FTS community.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SeaBeeDoc
Quote

 

Package is going to finally be sent off tomorrow, as I will be out of pocket this next month. My OMPF had a lot of duplicates in FC 30, and I had a FC 38 that was incorrectly coded. Now my OMPF is squeaky clean all my awards except for a few that I recently received is in my OMPF as well.  The others are reflected in my LTR to the Board.

I only have two items that might be the deciding factor as to whether I get selected, one is a 1of 1 MP which unfortunately will not drop off until next cycle and although my eval was good it really does not reflect a breakout  from lasts years eval.  I honestly thought I had checked everything in my OMPF last cycle and was surprised by what I found that needed to be corrected, especially that FC 38 WOW, that could have been the deciding factor, who knows.  Lesson learned, you need to open each FC from 30-38. The Board members only have a few minutes to screen each record so you don't want them screening duplicates. 

I hope everyone the best in completing your packages, see ya in a few! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yamzi-USN
5 hours ago, SeaBeeDoc said:

I honestly thought I had checked everything in my OMPF last cycle and was surprised by what I found that needed to be corrected, especially that FC 38 WOW, that could have been the deciding factor, who knows.

FC 38 Adverse Information. Anyone can help me what are the samples of adverse information? I have blank on my OMPF. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SeaBeeDoc

To: "mill_ompf-chg@navy.mil"

Subject: Corrections in OMPF (UNCLASSIFIED)

Date: Monday, March 13, 2017 3:49:00 PM

The following documents are blank pages and need to be omitted from my OMPF.

NAVPERS 1070/610 Change of Rate, Document ID 11725493

The following are documents are duplicates that needs to omitted from my OMPF

DD 214, Document ID 225180, Field Code 33, pg. 2

The FC 38 it was a unauthorized absence when I open it , it was actually a History of Assignments.

This is how I submitted it. 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
navyordie123

is there anyone that is stationed in Lemoore on here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LSHARP

I know I will get wide varying opinions.  Should I include my PRIMS printout in my LTB? No less than Excellent PFA score since 2011. Looking for pros and cons. I am of opinion that it should in fact hold weight, I am not getting by on the bare minimum consistently. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ITJuan(IW/SW/AW) 009

Question to all of the CPO's, SCPO's, and MCPO's in this forum. Should I submit a most updated NAVPERS 1070/880 Awards Records as an enclosure in my LTB?  My NAVPERS 1070/880 Awards Record that's currently in my OMPF is when I reenlisted in 2013.  Since then, I've received awards and added awards that weren't in my 2013 NAVPERS 1070/880 Awards Record. Not sure if I should submit a most recent one. Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
navyordie123
6 hours ago, LSHARP said:

I know I will get wide varying opinions.  Should I include my PRIMS printout in my LTB? No less than Excellent PFA score since 2011. Looking for pros and cons. I am of opinion that it should in fact hold weight, I am not getting by on the bare minimum consistently. 

no you don't have to because your PRT score is on your eval and plus I believe that they look at your PRIMS data anyways.  anything that is on your eval or that is already in your record you should not have to submit because the board will see that already. now if you know if you have completed something recently and if you have doubts about it making it to you record on time, then definitely send it in. I hope that this helps you out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LSHARP
3 hours ago, navyordie123 said:

no you don't have to because your PRT score is on your eval and plus I believe that they look at your PRIMS data anyways.  anything that is on your eval or that is already in your record you should not have to submit because the board will see that already. now if you know if you have completed something recently and if you have doubts about it making it to you record on time, then definitely send it in. I hope that this helps you out.

I was more looking toward the fact that I am not getting only a satisfactory I have been going above and beyond to maintain an excellent score since 2011. Navy eval only says PP everyone who hasn't failed has that. But if they look at it already then no need. Thanks. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
navyordie123
16 minutes ago, LSHARP said:

I was more looking toward the fact that I am not getting only a satisfactory I have been going above and beyond to maintain an excellent score since 2011. Navy eval only says PP everyone who hasn't failed has that. 

are you a CFL? cause if you are that is on your eval and the board will know that you have been getting those scores but if you aren't then I would ask a Chief and see what the board looks at and if they don't look at that then definitely send it in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SUBLANT
3 hours ago, navyordie123 said:

..... plus I believe that they look at your PRIMS data anyways.  .......

 

27 minutes ago, LSHARP said:

........ But if they look at it already then no need. Thanks. 

The board does not see PRIMS data, Check out slide #7 of the ENLISTED SELECTION BOARD BRIEF at http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/boards/activedutyenlisted/Pages/GeneralInformation.aspx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LSHARP
10 minutes ago, SUBLANT said:

 

The board does not see PRIMS data, Check out slide #7 of the ENLISTED SELECTION BOARD BRIEF at http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/boards/activedutyenlisted/Pages/GeneralInformation.aspx

That's what I thought originally. Physical fitness is not as big of a factor for promotion as some of the other branches. I just don't know if it's worth it to submit. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
navyordie123
36 minutes ago, LSHARP said:

That's what I thought originally. Physical fitness is not as big of a factor for promotion as some of the other branches. I just don't know if it's worth it to submit. 

Sorry for any misinformation. I thought that they might look at it, that's why I had said what I did. Thanks for the information SUBLANT.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FCC_Thawk

Peeking my head in here for the first time in a while. If any FCPO's need help with their LTB, reach out to me. I'll do what I can. Best of luck come August!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7jake7

Hello everyone. My first post here. Does anyone have an LTB that contains explanations, not just the standard sample from NPC? I'm just trying to see the verbiage and the correct way to write it. Also, would it be necessary to point out how I overcame LIMDU and 3 PRT waivers? I got healthy, lost almost 40 lbs., got outstanding last cycle and became an ACFL/95PT. Not an easy task but I'm not sure if that matters to the board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yamzi-USN

Got a question regarding OMPF Field Codes. So if your other field codes on  your record are not up-to-date, do you need to include it on your LTB as well? I am not talking about Evals and Awards Field Code. I am talking about like, History of assignments, Page 4, School Transcript, Re-enlistment Agreement, Extension Agreement, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 5 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online



×