Forum | Advancement | Career | Veteran | Bases | Enlisted Portal


Tony

FY18 Chief Selection Board

Rate this topic

391 posts in this topic

YAMZI-USN .. it's the last  pin you got.. mine is like this too. .:DSW.. I ask same thing .. it's fine..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulation's to everyone that made board! 4th times the charm here. Question, is there an app for this website by any chance? And a second question, I got a "continue to groom" 4 years ago so its still on the radar. Lets just say someone and I had some differences. Being told it's pretty much a hidden message, my last 4 evals have been considerably better. My last one I got #4 EP covering and Instructor of the year. It's an amazing evaluation. I've also put in for my MOVSM. Any idea that this will override that evaluation? I know that there is no crystal ball for the board but just trying to get some insight on possible chances. Thanks!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, first, congrats to all those that made board, I know for me the test seemed a bit harder than previous ones, that coupled with transferering in novemeber and not having an account until 3 days before the test, I was a little worried this year about making board. Luckily, I made it, 7 out of 7 now!  hopefully this year will be my year.

Ive talked to a LOT of senior leadership, many i know and many i dont, but have been sent to from other leadership, it seems the reoccuring cristisim has been not being in a big breakout group... my whole E-5 time i was 1 of 1, and a good portion of First Class i was 1 of 3... or 1 of 4... granted I did all the good things, but the down and dirty was that small a group, no one cares. however, finally, these last two years I was able to break out, taking 5 of 306 in 2015 and 3 of 352 in 2016. So hopefully this will be it... 

 

again, congrats to all those that made board, one step closer, and the long wait begins, make sure to review that record again and again, and have others as well, I know Ive looked time and time again and think im good, then I have others and there are little suggestions they have, so take them all in and decide what you think is best for your package and get er done!

Wish the best of luck to everyone, and those that didnt make board, it sucks, I know it does, but keep on pushing and make sure you crush that dang thing next year

 

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations to all those that made board this year! Now on to getting those records updated, and Letters to the Board written. The game is still far from over.

For those that did not. Hold your heads up. You now know where you need to focus more of your study time. Keep pushing, remember the exam is just one hurtle on the way to making Chief. What you do now can still effect your results when you do make board. Don't let up just because your ticket did not get punched this year.

By the way OneLastDance is still here with you. Just now as an OldSalt still trying to help out.;)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, OldSalt said:

By the way OneLastDance is still here with you. Just now as an OldSalt still trying to help out.;)

Thank you BBb)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

has anyone else noticed how they cut a lot of things out of the precept this year?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, SUBLANT said:

Yes. It was the same last year as well. No more bullet style requirements, now just long paragraphs about being culturally and professionally diversified. I kind of like the new one though. Because.....reasons. Haha

 

Yeah I do too but a little vague on what they will be looking for but it just means that we all have to be more well rounded which is not a bad thing.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎3‎/‎10‎/‎2017 at 3:49 AM, navyordie123 said:

it wouldn't hurt to have it in there. every little bit might help you and it will let the board know that you are keeping your record up to date.

I did the same as I had several duplicates and some blank pages as well and the worse one had me down as to having an unauthorized  absence when I opened it, it was a History of assignments ouch! Anyway on my LTB I annotated that the discrepancies were submitted to PERS and also printed the email with the date stamp as and enclosure to show that the discrepancies had actually been submitted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎3‎/‎9‎/‎2017 at 2:59 PM, ITJuan(IW/SW/AW) 009 said:

A huge congratulations to all of those who made SBE! Hopefully it's our year! 7th time is the charm...right? 

Question...I just took over Department LPO in January so it wasn't in my previous eval. With that said, should I mention that I am now Department LPO in my LTB or should I not??? <_<

I would see if you can get an appointment ltr, and add that to your package, anything that can show that you have a break out from last year can't hurt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, once again I have received the golden ticket, I have made some changes this year that will hopefully help me get that nod. I have a new command collateral, I have completed my SJPME, and I got my MTS Certification. I have also  have scrubbed and identified areas in my OMPF that need to be corrected. I also have other leadership roles in several committees that I am involved in as well as 365. Although I feel like I was proactive last year, I discovered a few areas where I could improve. As far as the distractors, I believe I have addressed the ones that I can correct on my end.

 I have completed my package and have had several looks and received feedback, next week we are having a Chief's board rodeo with all the Master Chief's  to go over our packages  once I get everyone's feedback I will make adjustments as needed and plan to submit my package before the 29th as I will be out of pocket on convalescence leave in April. My package is due the first of May. I only have two items that might be the deciding factor as to whether I get selected, one is a 1of 1 MP which unfortunately will not drop off until next cycle and although my eval was good it really does not reflect a breakout  from lasts years eval. Regardless, I have drank the kool aide and have done all I can do so if it is meant to be it will be and if not I have no regrets because I know I have done my job well and will continue to do so.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fellow first, FYI.. NKO has January 2017 CPO exam stats on how many people made board in Navy.. 31 for AT FTS... Woo! 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/26/2017 at 5:25 PM, GMFCC said:

SSP is subjective. Everyone on this forum will give you a slightly different answer.

As for acting in the capacity of the Chief, I would recommend you withhold that opinion until you put on anchors. However inept you believe your Chief to be, I have no doubts that he is there in the mess making things happen. Your eyes will open to the responsibility you don't have that you think you do after you are pinned.

Have you told your CoC that you feel that way? Have you pulled your Chief aside and thrown him the bone that people view him negatively? Not engaging in dragging him in the dirt isn't admirable if you're in the crowd watching others do it. I'm sure the people saying they want you as a Chief are right, you're probably a good dude and a great OS, but if you're going to be in this mess, I'd learn to help a shipmate out.

I hope you make it, but the biggest thing I've learned in this mess, is that if you aren't humble, you will be humiliated. If one Chief looks bad, we all look bad.

Yes- Subjective for sure, however, a good rule of thumb to gauge off of is comparing your ITA vs. the RSCA. Usually equates to you being above his/her overall average of all E6's written in the capacity of a reporting senior. You would typically find that the upper MP's fall above the RSCA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

496 out of 822 are board eligible for AOC. that's 60.3%. Cant wait to see what those quotas look like. here is hoping for the best!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone help me with NCR FTS exam stats on how many made board? I would greatly appreciate it! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finished the SEJPME I on JKO..long course but passed on first try ;)..

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, @T1 Mo said:

Finished the SEJPME I on JKO..long course but passed on first try ;)..

Awesome job! I heard there is a recent one out. I finished mine last September. Not sure if it's the same one you did.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning/afternoon y'all!

Question. Am I the only one using the "sample LTB" letter head that is displayed on the NPC site under active duty enlisted/general information?  I noticed it's slight different from the previous cycles letter head samples. I'm having my Chief's package reviewed and I was told to leave off  "#1. Please consider this package for the IT rating in my case."  I only had two CPO's look at my Chief's package so far and they both said to remove #1.

Should I leave it or remove it? I'm just following the "Sample LTB."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎3‎/‎16‎/‎2017 at 3:26 PM, @T1 Mo said:

Fellow first, FYI.. NKO has January 2017 CPO exam stats on how many people made board in Navy.. 31 for AT FTS... Woo! 

84 out of  137 in the HM FTS community.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

 

Package is going to finally be sent off tomorrow, as I will be out of pocket this next month. My OMPF had a lot of duplicates in FC 30, and I had a FC 38 that was incorrectly coded. Now my OMPF is squeaky clean all my awards except for a few that I recently received is in my OMPF as well.  The others are reflected in my LTR to the Board.

I only have two items that might be the deciding factor as to whether I get selected, one is a 1of 1 MP which unfortunately will not drop off until next cycle and although my eval was good it really does not reflect a breakout  from lasts years eval.  I honestly thought I had checked everything in my OMPF last cycle and was surprised by what I found that needed to be corrected, especially that FC 38 WOW, that could have been the deciding factor, who knows.  Lesson learned, you need to open each FC from 30-38. The Board members only have a few minutes to screen each record so you don't want them screening duplicates. 

I hope everyone the best in completing your packages, see ya in a few! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, SeaBeeDoc said:

I honestly thought I had checked everything in my OMPF last cycle and was surprised by what I found that needed to be corrected, especially that FC 38 WOW, that could have been the deciding factor, who knows.

FC 38 Adverse Information. Anyone can help me what are the samples of adverse information? I have blank on my OMPF. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To: "mill_ompf-chg@navy.mil"

Subject: Corrections in OMPF (UNCLASSIFIED)

Date: Monday, March 13, 2017 3:49:00 PM

The following documents are blank pages and need to be omitted from my OMPF.

NAVPERS 1070/610 Change of Rate, Document ID 11725493

The following are documents are duplicates that needs to omitted from my OMPF

DD 214, Document ID 225180, Field Code 33, pg. 2

The FC 38 it was a unauthorized absence when I open it , it was actually a History of Assignments.

This is how I submitted it. 

 

 

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is there anyone that is stationed in Lemoore on here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I will get wide varying opinions.  Should I include my PRIMS printout in my LTB? No less than Excellent PFA score since 2011. Looking for pros and cons. I am of opinion that it should in fact hold weight, I am not getting by on the bare minimum consistently. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question to all of the CPO's, SCPO's, and MCPO's in this forum. Should I submit a most updated NAVPERS 1070/880 Awards Records as an enclosure in my LTB?  My NAVPERS 1070/880 Awards Record that's currently in my OMPF is when I reenlisted in 2013.  Since then, I've received awards and added awards that weren't in my 2013 NAVPERS 1070/880 Awards Record. Not sure if I should submit a most recent one. Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, LSHARP said:

I know I will get wide varying opinions.  Should I include my PRIMS printout in my LTB? No less than Excellent PFA score since 2011. Looking for pros and cons. I am of opinion that it should in fact hold weight, I am not getting by on the bare minimum consistently. 

no you don't have to because your PRT score is on your eval and plus I believe that they look at your PRIMS data anyways.  anything that is on your eval or that is already in your record you should not have to submit because the board will see that already. now if you know if you have completed something recently and if you have doubts about it making it to you record on time, then definitely send it in. I hope that this helps you out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 31 Guests (See full list)

    • **PSjg78**
    • SeaBeeDoc


  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      ITJuan(IW/SW/AW) 009
      ITJuan(IW/SW/AW) 009
      7
    2. 2
      TRON828
      TRON828
      6
    3. 3
      FCC_Thawk
      FCC_Thawk
      6
    4. 4
      navyordie123
      navyordie123
      5
    5. 5
      DeepSea5342
      DeepSea5342
      4